Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:59:56.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The regulation of public morality and eugenics: a productive alliance between the Catholic Church and Italian Fascism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2020

Lucia Pozzi Open the ORCID record for Lucia Pozzi [Opens in a new window]
Lucia Pozzi*
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Queensland, Australia
*
*Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Historical research acknowledges only cursorily the Catholic contribution to eugenics. Yet there is a substantial link between Catholic discourses on morality and the emergence of Italian eugenics. In this essay I argue that sexual normalisation was a key source of consensus. Masculine and patriarchal values strengthened the strategic collaboration between Fascist demographic policies, the Italian interpretation of eugenics, and Catholic doctrine. I draw on archival and printed material to show that the control of public morality and the support for reproduction met both Catholic and Fascist interests. In particular, I focus on the alliance between the State and the Catholic Church working against ‘the contraceptive mentality’. Mussolini wanted to stimulate religious sentiment as a basis for the fight against depopulation. The Catholic Church desired a set of laws against immorality, birth control and abortion. In this way, Fascism and the Catholic Church found a solid cultural agreement around restoring traditional mores, patriarchal values, and gender hierarchy.

Sebbene sia noto il contributo cattolico all'eugenetica, la storiografia non si è mai concentrata sul legame sostanziale che corre tra i discorsi cattolici sulla moralità e l'emergere dell'eugenetica italiana. Questo saggio individua nella normalizzazione sessuale, vale a dire nei valori maschili e patriarcali, una fonte di consenso essenziale. Questi valori consolidarono la collaborazione strategica tra le politiche demografiche fasciste, l'interpretazione italiana dell'eugenetica e la dottrina cattolica. Ho utilizzato materiale d'archivio inedito e fonti a stampa per mostrare come il controllo della moralità pubblica e il sostegno alla riproduzione incontrarono il favore di cattolici e fascisti. In particolare, in questo saggio mi sono concentrata sull'alleanza tra lo Stato e la chiesa cattolica alleati contro ‘la mentalità contraccettiva’. Mussolini voleva alimentare il sentimento religioso come base per la lotta allo spopolamento. La chiesa cattolica desiderava una serie di leggi contro l'immoralità, il controllo delle nascite e l'aborto. In questo modo, il fascismo e la chiesa cattolica trovarono un solido accordo culturale fondato sul ripristino dei costumi tradizionali, dei valori patriarcali e della gerarchia di genere.

Keywords

eugenicsVaticanFascismmoralitybirth controlanti-feminism
Type
Research Articles
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , August 2020 , pp. 317 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Association for the Study of Modern Italy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M.B., ed. 1990. The Wellborn Science Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alfieri, E. 1930. ‘La protezione della maternità di fronte al problema demografico’. Maternità e infanzia 3: 281.Google Scholar
American birth control conference, 1921. Birth Control: what it is, how it works, what it will do: the proceedings of the first American birth control conference held at the Hotel Plaza. New York, November 11, 12, 1921. New York: The Birth Control Review.Google Scholar
Azara, L. 2010. Santa Sede e Società delle nazioni. In Pius XI Keywords. International Conference Milan 2009, edited by Guasco, A. and Perin, R., 407–418. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Benadusi, L. 2012. The Enemy of the New Man. Homosexuality in Fascist Italy. Translated by Dingee, S. and Pudney, J.. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Betta, E. 2012. ‘Note sulla storia dell'articolo 553 del codice penale’. In Forme del politico tra Ottocento e Novecento. Studi di storia per Raffaele Romanelli, edited by Betta, E., Caglioti, D.L., and Papadia, E., 131–152. Rome: Viella.Google Scholar
Bompiani, E. 1931. Eugenica e stirpe, Rome: Luigi Pozzi editore.Google Scholar
Bresci, A. 1993. ‘L'opera Nazionale Maternità e Infanzia Nel Ventennio Fascista’. Italia Contemporanea, September: 421–41.Google Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A.M. 1935. ‘Eugenics in the Light of Population Trends’. Eugenics Review 27 (10): 11–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Cassata, F. 2006. Il fascismo razionale. Corrado Gini fra scienza e politica. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Cassata, F. 2011. Building the New Man: Eugenics, Racial Science and Genetics in Twentieth-Century Italy. Translated by O'Loughlin, Erin. New York: Central European University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattani, G. 1929. Igiene del matrimonio. Milan: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Chamedes, G. 2013. ‘The Vatican and the Reshaping of the European International Order after the First World War’. The Historical Journal 56, (4): 955–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesler, E. 2007. Woman of Valor: Margaret Sanger and the Birth Control Movement in America. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
La Civiltà Cattolica 1927. ‘La teoria della popolazione’ 1, 5 February: 216.Google Scholar
Connelly, M.J. 2009. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Grazia, V. 1993. How Fascism Ruled Women: Italy, 1922–1945. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Debenham, C. 2018. Marie Stopes’ Sexual Revolution and the Birth Control Movement. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-71664-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detragiache, D. 1980. ‘Un aspect de la politique démographique de l'Italie fasciste: la repression de l'avortement’. Mélanges de l'Ecole française de Rome – Moyen âge, temps modernes 92 (2): 691–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Francesco, S. 1929. Igiene della maternità. Consigli di igiene per la vita sessuale femminile e per il neonato. Milan: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Durand, J-D. 2006. Les Semaines Sociales de France 1904–2004. Lyon: Parole et Silence.Google Scholar
Gemelli, A. 1924, ‘L'eugenetica e la morale cattolica. A proposito del I Congresso Italiano di Eugenetica Sociale’. Vita e Pensiero 10 (6): 731–50.Google Scholar
Gemelli, A. 1928. ‘Il problema delle famiglie numerose’. Vita e Pensiero 14 (3): 131–138.Google Scholar
Gemelli, A. 1933, ‘La “sterilizzazione coattiva e preventive” nell'insegnamento degli studiosi italiani’. Economia Italiana 11–12: 117–28.Google Scholar
Grossman, A. 1995. Reforming Sex: The German Movement for Birth Control and Abortion Reform, 1920–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, D. 2011. Sexuality in Europe: A Twentieth-Century History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/sexuality-in-europe/53DFF64C06CB4F81E528E68209723BD7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ipsen, C. 1992. Dictating Demography. The Problem of Population in Fascist Italy. Berkeley University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jütte, R. 2008. Contraception: A History. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Kevles, D.J. 1995. In the Name of Eugenics. Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Korherr, R. 1928. Regresso delle nascite. Morte dei popoli. Translated by Mussolini, Benito. Rome: Libreria del Littorio.Google Scholar
Lécrivain, P. 1990. ‘Les semaines sociales de France’. In Le mouvement social catholique en France au XXe siècle, edited by Maugenest, D., 151–65. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Mantovani, C. 2004. Rigenerare la società: l'eugenetica in Italia dalle origini ottocentesche agli anni Trenta. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
Mclaren, A. 1990. A History of Contraception. From Antiquity to Present Day. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mosse, G.L. 1985. Nationalism and Sexuality: Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality in Modern Europe. 1st ed. New York: Fertig.Google Scholar
Pestalozza, E. 1931a. ‘Dopo l'enciclica sul matrimonio cristiano. La parola della scienza’. L'Osservatore Romano, 22 January.Google Scholar
Pestalozza, E. 1931b. ‘L'integrità e la sanità della stirpe nel Nuovo Codice Penale’. La Clinica Ostetrica, 9 (1): 1–5.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. F. 2010. Fascism and Catholicism, edited by Bosworth, R. J. B.. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199594788.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199594788-e-10Google Scholar
Pozzi, L. 2012. ‘The Problem of Birth Control in the United States under the Papacy of Pius XI’. In Pius XI and America. Proceedings of the Brown University Conference (Providence, October 2010), edited by Melloni, A., Kertzer, D., and Gallagher, C., 209–232. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Pozzi, L. 2013. ‘La Casti connubii, il magistero e la legge naturale: note sulla storia della genesi del documento pontificio’. Cristianesimo nella storia, 3: 799–822.Google Scholar
Pozzi, L. 2014. ‘La Chiesa cattolica e la sessualità coniugale: l'enciclica “Casti connubii”’. Contemporanea: rivista di storia dell'800 e del' 900 (3): 387–412.Google Scholar
Pozzi, L. 2017. ‘The Encyclical Casti connubii (1930): The Origin of the XX Century Discourse of the Catholic Church on Family and Sexuality’. In La Sainte Famille. Sexualité, filiation et parentalité dans l’Église catholique, edited by Sägesser, C. and Vanderpelen-Diagre, C., 41–53. Bruxelles: Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Quaderno dei medici. 1933. ‘Il 2. Convegno dei medici cattolici (Firenze, 16–18 ottobre 1932)’, Primo supplemento Studium. Rivista universitaria, mensile della Federazione Universitaria Cattolica Italiana 3 (1933).Google Scholar
Quine, M.S. 2010. ‘The First-Wave Eugenic Revolution in Southern Europe: Science sans frontières’. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, edited by Bashford, A. and Levine, P.. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195373141.013.0023Google Scholar
Quine, M.S. 2012. ‘Racial “Sterility” and “Hyperfecundity” in Fascist Italy. Biological Politics of Sex and Reproduction’. Fascism, 2 (1): 92–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraceno, C. 1994. ‘Redefining Maternity and Paternity: Gender, Pronatalism, and Social Policies in Fascist Italy’. In Maternity and Gender Policies. Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States, 1880s–1950s, edited by Bock, G. and Thane, P., 196–212. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Susmel, E. and D., eds. 1964. Opera Omnia di Benito Mussolini. Florence: La Fenice.Google Scholar
Unterburger, K., and Wolf, H. 2006. Die Lage der Kirche in Deutschland: Der Schlußbericht des Nuntius vom 18. November 1929. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
Verucci, G. 1988. La Chiesa Nella Società Contemporanea: Dal Primo Dopoguerra al Concilio Vaticano II. Rome: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
Vittoria, A. 1995. ‘I diari di Luigi Federzoni. Appunti per una biografia’. Studi storici (3): 729–60.Google Scholar
Wanrooij, B.P.F. 1990. Storia del pudore. La questione sessuale in Italia 1860–1940. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Zocchi, P. 2007. ‘La clinica ostetrico-ginecologica di Milano da Luigi Mangiagalli a Emilio Alfieri (1906–1948)’. Annali di storia delle università italiane (11): 237–50.Google Scholar