Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:32:28.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WHAT CONSTITUTED HISTORICAL EVIDENCE OF THE NEW WORLD? CLOSENESS AND DISTANCE IN WILLIAM ROBERTSON AND FRANCISCO JAVIER CLAVIJERO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2014

SILVIA SEBASTIANI
SILVIA SEBASTIANI*
Affiliation:
Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to Gerbi's classical study, the “dispute of the New World” entered a new phase in the 1780s, one marked by voices coming from the Americas. New questions were then raised about the writing of history, its method, scope and proofs. This essay pursues a dual-track enquiry, confronting the History of America (1777) by the Presbyterian minister William Robertson, a leading figure of the Scottish Enlightenment, with the Storia antica del Messico (1780–81) by the Mexican exiled Jesuit Francisco Javier Clavijero. The two works, one written from the centre of the world's commercial expansion, the other from the Pontifical States, were engaged in a sophisticated dialogue, which yields two alternative, competing conceptions of history and of humankind. To Robertson's philosophical history, which developed from a long-distance perspective, characteristic of Enlightenment, Clavijero responded by reassessing the Jesuit and antiquarian tradition, based on closeness, local expertise and direct observation.

Type
Forum: Closeness and Distance in the Age of Enlightenment
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , November 2014 , pp. 677 - 695
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gerbi, Antonello, The Dispute of the New World: The History of a Polemic, 1750–1900, trans. Moyle, Jeremy (Pittsburgh, 1973; first published 1955)Google Scholar.

2 Hartog, François, Régimes d’historicité: Présentisme et expériences du temps (Paris, 2002)Google Scholar; Hartog, Evidence de l’histoire: Ce que voient les historiens (Paris, 2005).

3 Sahlins, Marshall, How “Natives” Think: About Captain Cook, For Example (Chicago, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 I borrow the expression from Jouhaud, Christian, Mazarinades: La fronde des mots (1985) (Paris, 2009)Google Scholar.

5 Clavigero, Francesco Saverio, Storia antica del Messico cavata da’ migliori storici Spagnuoli, e da’ manoscriti, e dalle pitture antiche degl’Indiani, 2 vols. (Cesena, 1780–81)Google Scholar. For Clavijero's biography, see Ronan, Charles E., Francisco Javier Clavigero, S.J. (1731–1787), Figure of the Mexican Enlightenment: His Life and Works (Rome and Chicago, 1977)Google Scholar.

6 Clavigero, The History of Mexico: Collected from Spanish and Mexican Historians, from Manuscripts, and Ancient Paintings of the Indians . . . Translated from the Original Italian, by Charles Cullen, Esq., 2 vols. (London, 1787)—reprinted in London in 1807, in Philadelphia in 1804 and in 1817, and in Richmond, Virginia in 1806. The English version was also the basis for a German translation which appeared in Leipzig in 1790. The first Spanish edition, translated from the Italian by José Joaquín de Mora, was published in London, at R. Ackerman's publishing house, in 1826. Only in 1945 was the original Spanish text by Clavijero published in Mexico, in an edition established by Mariano Cuevas.

7 Robertson, William, The History of America (1777), 5th edn, 3 vols. (London, 1788)Google Scholar.

8 Sebastiani, Silvia, “L’Amérique des Lumières et la hiérarchie des races: Disputes sur l’écriture de l’histoire dans l’Encyclopaedia Britannica (1768–1788)”, Annales HSS, 67/2 (2012), 327–61Google Scholar.

9 See Momigliano, Arnaldo, Studies in Historiography (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Phillips, Mark Salber, “Reconsideration on History and Antiquarianism: Arnaldo Momigliano and the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Britain”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 57 (1996), 297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Phillips, , Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740–1820 (Princeton, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kidd, Colin, Subverting Scotland's Past: Scottish Whig Historians and the Creation of an Anglo-British Identity 1689–1830 (Cambridge, 1994)Google Scholar.

10 For his Charles V, Robertson was paid around four thousand pounds, a sum never given before for a historical work. See Sher, Richard B., The Enlightenment and the Book: Scottish Authors and Their Publishers in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Ireland and America (Chicago, 2006), 214Google Scholar.

11 See, among others, Batllori, Miguel, La cultura hispano-italiana de los Jesuitas expulsos: españoles–hispanoamericanos–filipinos, 1767–1814 (Madrid, 1966)Google Scholar; Segurado, Eva María St Clair, Expulsión y exilio de la provincia jesuita Mexicana (1767–1820) (San Vicente del Raspeig, 2005)Google Scholar; Valle, Ivonne del, Escribiendo desde los márgenes: Colonialismo y jesuitas en el siglo XVIII (México, 2009)Google Scholar.

12 Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge, How to Write the History of the New World: Histories, Epistemologies, and Identities in the Eighteenth-century Atlantic World (Stanford, 2001)Google Scholar.

13 Romano, Antonella, ed., Rome et la science moderne entre Renaissance et Lumières (Rome, 2008)Google Scholar; see especially Romano's “Introduction” and “Conclusion”.

14 The names of the Jesuits writing about America include Giovanni Ignacio Molina on Chile; Juan de Velasco, José Jolís and José Manuel Peramás on Quito, Paraguay and Rio de la Plata; Filippo Salvatore Gilij on Orinoco.

15 Among a very abundant literature see Cárcel, Ricardo García, La leyenda negra: Historia y opinión (Madrid, 1998)Google Scholar; Greer, Margaret R., Mignolo, Walter D. and Quilligan, Maureen, eds., Rereading the Black Legend: The Discourses of Religious and Racial Difference in the Renaissance Empires (Chicago, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Rabasa, José, Sato, Masayuki, Tortarolo, Edoardo and Woolf, Daniel, eds., The Oxford History of Historical Writing, vol. 3, 1400–1800 (Oxford, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Meek, Ronald L., Social Science and Ignoble Savage (Cambridge, 1976)Google Scholar.

18 Smith, Adam took the hypothetical scenario of a desert island, in order to outline the historical progress, in his Lectures on Jurisprudence, ed. Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D. and Stein, P. G. (Oxford, 1978), 14–16Google Scholar.

19 Koselleck, Reinhart, “‘Space of Experience’ and ‘Horizon of Expectation’: Two Historical Categories”, in Koselleck, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (1979), trans. Keith Tribe (New York, 2004), 267–88Google Scholar; Koselleck, “Historia Magistra Vitae: The Dissolution of the Topos into the Perspective of a Modernized Historical Process”, in ibid., 21–38; Hartog, Evidence de l’histoire, 170.

20 Voltaire, Traité de métaphysique (1734), in Voltaire, Oeuvres complètes, ed. Louis Moland, 52 vols. (Paris, 1877–85), 22: 192. Written in the 1730s but not published until the nineteenth century, the Traité aimed at pursuing the impact of Newtonianism on the science of man. The expedient of the extraterrestrial at the outset of the work was instrumental for showing, as evidence, the polygenetic origins of humankind. Voltaire employed again the image of extraterrestrials descending on the Earth in his 1752 short story Micromégas.

21 Turgot, Anne Robert Jacques, Plan d’un ouvrage sur la géographie politique, in Oeuvres de Turgot et documents le concernant, ed. Schelle, Gustave, 6 vols. (Paris, 1913–23), 1: 258–9Google Scholar.

22 On the definition of distance as “a range of experience” see Phillips, Mark S., “Distance and Historical Representation”, History Workshop Journal, 57 (2004), 123–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Phillips, , On Historical Distance (New Haven, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Smith, Lectures on Jurisprudence, 14–6.

24 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes par Jean Jacques Rousseau, citoyen de Genève (1755), in Oeuvres complètes, ed. Gagnebin, B. and Raymond, M., 5 vols. (Paris, 1959–95), 3: 132–3Google Scholar; Lévi-Strauss, Claude, “Jean-Jacques Rousseau, fondateur des sciences de l’homme”, in Baud-Bovy, S.et al., eds., Jean-Jacques Rousseau (Neuchâtel, 1962), 239–48Google Scholar; Lévi-Strauss, , Le totémisme aujourd’hui (Paris, 1962)Google Scholar. For an interesting comment, see François Hartog, “Le regard éloigné: Lévi-Strauss et l’histoire”, in Hartog, Evidence de l’histoire, 175–90.

25 “When wishing to study men one has to look close up; but to study man one must learn to cast one's gaze afar: one must first observe the differences in order to discover the properties.” Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Essai sur l’origine des langues, ed. Kremer-Marietti, Angèle (Paris, 1974), 192–4Google Scholar.

26 Sebastiani, Silvia, The Scottish Enlightenment: Race, Gender and the Limits of Progress (New York, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 As Burke, Edmund wrote in a now famous letter to Robertson on 9 June 1777. See The Correspondence of Edmund Burke, vol. 3, ed. Guttridge, George H. (Cambridge, 1961), 351Google Scholar.

28 Brown, Stewart J., ed., William Robertson and the Expansion of Empire (Cambridge, 1997)Google Scholar; O’Brien, Karen, Narratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge, 1997), 93–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pocock, John G. A., Barbarism and Religion, vol. 4, Barbarians, Savages and Empires (Cambridge, 2005), 157–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Robertson's plan of writing about British America was in fact interrupted by the explosion of the Revolution.

30 Hartog, Evidence de l’histoire, 137.

31 See Hamowy, Ronald, The Scottish Enlightenment and the Theory of Spontaneous Order (Carbondale, IL, 1987)Google Scholar; Francesconi, Daniele, L’età della storia: Linguaggi storiografici dell’Illuminismo scozzese (Bologna, 2003)Google Scholar; Smith, Craig, “The Scottish Enlightenment, Unintended Consequences and the Science of Man”, Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 7 (2009), 9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Robertson, History of America, Book IV, 2: 52.

33 Hudson, Nicholas, “From ‘Nation’ to ‘Race’: The Origin of Racial Classification in Eighteenth-century Thought”, Eighteenth-century Studies, 29 (1996), 247–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Hume, David, The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688 (1754–62), vol. 3, ed. Todd, William B. (Indianapolis, 1983)Google Scholar.

35 Phillips, “Distance and Historical Representation”, 131; Phillips, “Relocating Inwardness: Historical Distance and the Transition from Enlightenment to Romantic Historiography”, Proceedings of the Modern Languages Association, 118 (2003), 436–9.

36 Robertson, William, The History of the Reign of the Emperor Charles V: With a View of the Progress of Civil Society in Europe from the Subversion of the Roman Empire to the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century, 3 vols. (London, 1769), 1: 21–2Google Scholar, emphasis added.

37 Ibid., 123.

38 The “alphabetic writing” and the “invention of print” respectively marked the third and eighth epochs of Condorcet's Tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain, for which see the critical edition by J.-P. Schandeler and P. Crépel (Paris, 2004).

39 Robertson, William, History of Scotland, 2 vols. (London, 1759), 1: 1–2Google Scholar; Robertson, , An Historical Disquisition concerning the Knowledge which the Ancients had of India (London, 1791), 1–2Google Scholar.

40 Mckenzie, Daniel F., Oral Culture, Literacy and Print in Early New Zealand: The Treaty of Waitangi (Wellington, 1985)Google Scholar; Mckenzie, , Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (London, 1986)Google Scholar.

41 de Certeau, Michel, L’écriture de l’histoire (Paris, 1980), “Préface”Google Scholar. See also Goodie, Jack, Domestication of the Savage Mind (Cambridge, 1977)Google Scholar; Goodie, , The Logic of Writing and the Organisation of Society (Cambridge, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Robertson, History of America, Book VII, 3: 177–83, 180, 183, emphasis in the original. Robertson refers to William Warburton's The Divine Legation of Moses (1738–41) as a guide for a natural history of the forms of writing.

43 Brown, Stewart J., “An Eighteenth-Century Historian on the Amerindians: Culture, Colonialism and Christianity in William Robertson's History of America”, Studies in World Christianity, 2 (1996), 204–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 In the Preface to his On Historical Distance Phillips refers to these four categories of distance “in terms of modes of understanding or conceptualization”, while distinguishing them from “distancing” or “distantiation”, which only designates “movements towards positions that are comparatively remote or detached”.

45 Clavijero, Storia antica del Messico, iii–vii.

46 Ibid., xxvii–xxviii.

47 See Gerbi, The Dispute of the New World, 233 ff.

48 Dissertations on the Land, the Animals, and the Inhabitants of Mexico: In which The Ancient History of that Country is confirmed, many Points of Natural History illustrated, and numerous Errors refuted, which have been published concerning America by some celebrated modern Authors.

49 Cañizares, How to Write the History of the New World, 63.

50 See, among others, Diogo Ramada Curto, ed., The Jesuits and Cultural Intermediacy in Early Modern World, Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu, 74/147 (2005); de Castelnau-L’Éstoile, Charlotteet al., eds., Missions d’évangélisation et circulation des savoirs: XVIe–XVIIIe siècle (Madrid, 2011)Google Scholar.

51 Robertson, History of America, Book VII, 3: 183–4 n.

52 Ibid., 157–8 n. See also Note XXVI, 384–90.

53 Robertson to Lord Elliock, National Library of Scotland, Edinburgh, MS, 1036, f. 106; see Black, Jeremy, “The Enlightenment Historian at Work: The Researches of William Robertson”, Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 65 (1988), 251–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Robertson, History of America, 1: xviii–xix, emphasis added. In Robertson's classification of sources the works by the Franciscan missionary Juan de Torquemada's Monarchia Indiana (1615) and the collector of Mexican codices and paintings Lorenzo Boturini Benaduci were considered as the less consistent, precisely because they pretended to give a statute of reliability to pictograms. See Brading, David A., The First America: The Spanish Monarchy, Creole Patriots and the Liberal State, 1492–1867 (Cambridge, 1991), 432–41, 455Google Scholar.

55 Robertson, History of America, 1: xvii.

56 See especially Momigliano, “Ancient History and the Antiquarian” (1950); “Gibbon's Contribution to Historical Method” (1954); “Historiography on Written Tradition and Historiography on Oral Tradition” (1961), in Studies in Historiography.

57 Cullen, Preface to Clavijero, History of Mexico, 1: v.

58 Monthly Review, 76 (1787), 633–40. The same review also appeared in the Scots Magazine, 49 (1787), 446–9 and 548–51.

59 The European Magazine, and London Review, 12 (1787), 16–8; see also 125–9.

60 The English Review, or, An Abstract of English and Foreign Literature, 9 (1787), 401–10; 10 (1787), 170–82; 11 (1787), 176–87.

61 Monthly Review, 65 (1781), 462–4.

62 See especially Barton, Benjamin Smith, Observations on Some Parts of Natural History: To Which is Prefixed an Account of Several Remarkable Vestiges of an Ancient Date, Which Have Been Discovered in Different Parts of North America: Part I (London, 1787)Google Scholar; Barton, , New Views of the Origin of the Tribes and Nations of America (Philadelphia, 1797)Google Scholar. In his annotations of the American edition of John Pinkerton's Modern Geography (which first appeared in London in 1802), Barton also defended Clavijero and the reliability of Mexican paintings as historical sources against Pinkerton's attacks: Modern Geography: A Description of the Empires, Kingdoms, States, and Colonies . . . The article America, corrected and considerably enlarged, by Dr. Barton, of Philadelphia, 2 vols. (Philadelphia, 1804), 2: 457. See also Burton's correspondence in Ewan, Joseph and Ewan, Nesta Dunn, Benjamin Smith Barton: Naturalist and Physician in Jeffersonian America (St Louis, 2007), 253–7Google Scholar.

63 For details on the failure to publish Robertson's and Clavijero's Spanish translations see respectively Humphreys, Robert A., “William Robertson and His History of America” (1954), in Humphreys, Tradition and Revolt in Latin America and Other Essays (New York, 1969), 34–6Google Scholar; and Ronan, Charles E., “Clavigero: The Fate of a Manuscript”, The Americas, 27/2 (1970), 113–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Moreno, Roberto, “Las notas de Alzate a la Historia antigua de Clavijero”, Estudios de cultura nahuatl, 10 (1972), 359–92, with the notes of Books VI and VII in AnnexGoogle Scholar; Moreno, “Las notas de Alzate a la Historia Antigua de Clavijero (Addenda)”, Estudios de cultura nahuatl, 12 (1976), 85–120, with the notes of Books I and II in Annex. See also Gabriela Goldin Marcovich, “La circulation des savoirs entre l’Europe et la nouvelle Espagne au XVIIIe siècle. Les gazettes de José Antonio de Alzate y Ramírez” (unpublished Master 2, EHESS, Paris, 2011–12).

65 Goodie, Jack, The Theft of History (Cambridge, 2006)Google Scholar.