Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:28:53.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Savarkar before Hindutva: Sovereignty, Republicanism, and Populism in India, c.1900–1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2020

Vikram Visana
Vikram Visana*
Affiliation:
Department of History, English, Linguistics and Music, University of Huddersfield
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was the theorizer of Hindutva (1923)—the project to radically reconfigure India as a Hindu majoritarian state. Assessments of Savarkar's earlier The Indian War of Independence (1909), a history of the 1857 Indian “Mutiny,” have generally subsumed this tract into the logic of Hindutva. This article offers a reassessment of The Indian War of Independence and situates it within the political and intellectual context of fin de siècle western India. I suggest that this history of Indian rebellion propagated a novel iteration of Indian popular sovereignty predicated on Hindu–Muslim unity. I read Savarkar as adapting the ideas of Giuseppe Mazzini and Johann Kaspar Bluntschli to challenge what he regarded as the fissiparous logic of late colonial liberalism. Finally, this article argues that Savarkar's account of the mutual constitution of general will and the personalism of sovereignty must be read as a previously unacknowledged instance of Indian populism.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 1106 - 1129
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and Others v. State of Kerala and Another, AIR 1973 SC 1461, para. 1665, cited in Moiz Tundawala, “In the Shadow of Swaraj: Constituent Power and the Indian Political” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, 2018).

2 Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and Others v. State of Kerala and Another, para. 1677.

3 Pierre Rosanvallon, Democracy Past and Future, ed. Samuel Moyn (New York, 2006), 79–116.

4 For a wider interdisciplinary discussion about the conundrum of sovereignty and the tension between the transcendent legitimation of political power and the messy reality of everyday politics and society in India see Gilmartin, David, Price, Pamela, and Ruud, Arild Engelsen, eds., South Asian Sovereignty: The Conundrum of Worldly Power (London, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Mantena, Karuna, Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberalism Imperialism (Princeton, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Visana, Vikram, “Vernacular Liberalism, Capitalism, and Anti-imperialism in the Political Thought of Dadabhai Naoroji,” Historical Journal 59/3 (2016), 775–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Koditschek, Theodore, Liberalism, Imperialism and the Historical Imagination: Nineteenth-Century Visions of a Greater Britain (Cambridge, 2011)Google Scholar.

7 Kapila, Shruti, “A History of Violence,” Modern Intellectual History 7/2 (2010), 437–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 456.

8 Sultan, Nasmul S., “Self-Rule and the Problem of Peoplehood in Colonial India,” American Political Science Review 114/1 (2020), 81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 81.

9 Benton, Lauren, A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900 (Cambridge, 2009), 244–58, 290CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Heesterman, J. C., The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society (Chicago, 1985), 117–18Google Scholar.

11 Ibid., 157; For a further exploration see Gilmartin, David, “Towards a Global History of Voting: Sovereignty, the Diffusion of Ideas, and the Enchanted Individual,” Religions 3 (2012), 407–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for “dispersed sovereignty” see Kapila, Shruti, “Ambedkar's Agonism: Sovereign Violence and Pakistan as Peace,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 39/1 (2019), 184–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Sharma, R. S., Aspects of Political Ideas and Institutions in Ancient India, 4th edn (Delhi, 1996), 49–61Google Scholar.

13 Stein, Burton, “The Segmentary State in Southern Indian History,” in Fox, Richard G., ed., Realm and Region in Traditional India (Durham, NC, 1977), 3–51Google Scholar, at 16; Stein, Burton, Peasant State and Society in Medieval South India (Oxford, 1980); Stein, “State Formation and Economy Reconsidered,” Modern Asian Studies 19/3 (1985), 387–413, at 394Google Scholar. For a critique of this viewpoint see Kulke, Hermann, “Fragmentation and Segmentation versus Integration? Reflections on the Concepts of Indian Feudalism and the Segmentary State in Indian History,” Studies in History 4/1 (1982), 237–63Google Scholar.

14 Nicholas Dirks, The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom (Cambridge, 1987), 284.

15 Vinayak Chaturvedi, Peasant Pasts: History and Memory in Western India (Berkeley, 2007); Milinda Banerjee, The Mortal God: Imagining the Sovereign in Colonial India (Cambridge, 2018).

16 Shruti Kapila, “Global Intellectual History and the Indian Political,” in Darrin M. McMahon and Samuel Moyn, eds. Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History (Oxford, 2014), 253–74, at 270.

17 An Indian Nationalist [Savarkar], The Indian War of Independence of 1857 (London, 1909).

18 All references are taken from the 1938 edition. Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Hindutva: Who Is a Hindu? (New Delhi, 1938).

19 Bakhle, Janaki, “Country First? Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and the Writing of Essentials of Hindutva,” Public Culture 22/1 (2010), 149–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 154.

20 Shruti Kapila, “The Nation and Its Social: An Ambedkarian Reading of Indian Politics,” Ambedkar Memorial Lecture, School of Oriental and African Studies, 19 April 2018; and Kapila, “Ambedkar's Agonism.”

21 Bakhle, “Country First?,” 155.

22 Faisal Devji, The Impossible Indian: Gandhi and the Temptation of Violence (Cambridge, 2012), 75–83.

23 Janaki Bakhle, “Putting Global Intellectual History in Its Place,” in Samuel Moyn and Andrew Sartori, eds., Global Intellectual History (New York, 2013), 228–53, at 233.

24 Chaturvedi, Vinayak, “Rethinking Knowledge with Action: V. D. Savarkar, the Bhagavat Gita, and Histories of Warfare,” Modern Intellectual History 7/2 (2010), 417–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chaturvedi, Vinayak, “A Revolutionary's Biography: The Case of V. D. Savarkar,” Postcolonial Studies 16/2 (2013), 124–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ANandy, shis, “A Disowned Father of the Nation in India: Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and the Demonic and the Seductive in Indian Nationalism,” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 15/1 (2014), 91–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 For the twentieth century as a Nietzschean moment in Indian political thought see Kapila, “A History of Violence,” 445.

26 John Pincince, “On the Verge of Hindutva: V. D. Savarkar, Revolutionary, Convict, Ideologue, c.1905–1924” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, 2007); Manisha Basu, The Rhetoric of Hindu India: Language and Urban Nationalism (Cambridge, 2017), 111. Kapila, “The Nation and Its Social”; Shruti Kapila, Violent Fraternity: Global Political Thought in the Indian Age (Princeton, forthcoming).

27 Richard Tuck, The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Democracy (Cambridge, 2016).

28 John Pincince, “V. D. Savarkar and the Indian War of Independence: Contrasting Perspectives on an Emergent Composite State,” in Crispin Bates and Marina Carter, eds., Mutiny at the Margins: New Perspectives on the Indian Uprising of 1857, vol. 6 (London, 2014), 42–60.

29 Misra, Amalendu, “Savarkar and the Discourse of Islam in Pre-independent India,” Journal of Asian History 33/2 (1999), 142–84Google Scholar; Krishnan, Shri, “Discourses on Modernity: Gandhi and Savarkar,” Studies in History 29/1 (2013), 61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Owen, Nicholas, “The Soft Heart of the British Empire: Indian Radicals in Edwardian London,” Past and Present 220 (2013), 143–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 149.

30 Raymond Geuss, Philosophy and Real Politics (Princeton, NJ, 2008), 2–15; Pierre Rosanvallon, Le siècle du populisme: Histoire, théorie, critique (Paris, 2020).

31 Berlin, Isaiah, Hofstadter, Richard, MacRae, Donald, Schapiro, Leonard, Seton-Watson, Hugh, Touraine, Alain, Venturi, Franco, Walicki, Andrzej, and Worsley, Peter, “To Define Populism,” Government and Opposition 3/2 (1968), 137–79Google Scholar, at 142, 172–4.

32 Chantal Mouffe, For a Left Populism (London: 2018); Nadia Urbinati, Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy (Cambridge, MA, 2019), 33; Rosanvallon, Le siecle du populisme, Ch. 6.

33 Charles Postel, The Populist Vision (Oxford, 2007), 4; for accounts which define populism as tending towards anti-pluralism, illiberal politics, and authoritarianism see Jan Werner-Mueller, What Is Populism? (Philadelphia, 2016); and Federico Finchelstein, From Fascism to Populism in History (Oakland, 2017).

34 Vikram Sampath, Savarkar: Echoes from a Forgotten Past 1883–1924 (Gurgaon, 2019), 10.

35 Ibid., 10–11.

36 Christopher Pinney, Photos of the Gods: The Printed Image and Political Struggle in India (London, 2004), 48.

37 Y. D. Phadke, V. K. Chiploonkar (New Delhi, 1982), 27.

38 Hulas Singh, The Rise of Reason: Intellectual History of 19th-Century Maharashtra (Abingdon, 2016).

39 Friedrich Nietzsche, “On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Life” (1874), in Nietzsche, Untimely Meditations (Cambridge, 1997), 57–124.

40 C. A. Bayly, Recovering Liberties: Indian Thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire (Cambridge, 2011); Koditschek, Liberalism, Imperialism and the Historical Imagination; Visana, “Vernacular Liberalism.”

41 Sumit Guha, History and Collective Memory in South Asia 1200–2000 (Seattle, 2019), 117.

42 “Mahratta Bhakars [sic] or Chronicles and Grant Duff's History of the Marathas,” Journal of the Poona Savarjanik Sabha 1/2 (1878), 12–23, at 14.

43 Guha, History and Collective Memory in South Asia, 83–118.

44 Prachi Deshpande, Creative Pasts: Historical Memory and Identity in Western India, 1700–1960 (New York, 2007), 28.

45 Ibid., 48.

46 Chaturvedi, “A Revolutionary Biography,” 126.

47 Kapila, Shruti, “Self, Spencer and Swaraj: Nationalist Thought and Critiques of Liberalism, 1890–1920,” Modern Intellectual History 4/1 (2007), 109–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Sampath, Savarkar, 15–24.

49 B. G. Tilak to Dadabhai Naoroji, 6 Dec. 1904, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi (hereafter NMML), B. G. Tilak Papers Microfilm Reel 1, Serial Number 1.

50 Letters from Har Dayal to Shyamji Krishnavarma, 28 Aug. 1907, and to S. Rana (undated) 1910, in Letters of Har Dayal, ed. Dharamvira (Ambala, 1970), 40, 91, cited in Kapila, “Self, Spencer and Swaraj,” 122.

51 Kapila, “Self, Spencer and Swaraj.”

52 Savarkar Newsletters, 20 Dec. 1906, 8 Feb. 1907, in V. D. Savarkar, Samagra Savarakara Vanmaya, vol. 4 (Pune, 1965), 19–23, 29–34.

53 “Mr. Dadabhai Naoroji and Indian Politics,” Indian Sociologist, Nov. 1906, 44.

54 Pall Mall Gazette, 14. Aug. 1893; Vikram Visana, The Political Thought of Dadabhai Naoroji: Liberalism, Capitalism, and Commercial Society in the Global Age (forthcoming).

55 “Dadabhai Naoroji and Another v. the Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China, 4 May 1868,” in The Law Journal Reports for the Year 1868, vol. 37 (London, 1868), 221–5.

56 F. R. W. Hedges, secretary to the Royal Masonic Institution to Naoroji, April 1890, National Archives of India, New Delhi, Dadabhai Naoroji Papers (hereafter DNP), H-80; Crusaders’ Lodge to Naoroji, 18 Jan. 1893, DNP, C-293; North London Masonic Benevolent Ball to Naoroji, 14 Nov. 1894, DNP, N-136.

57 Dosabhai Framji Karaka, The History of the Parsis, vol. 1 (London, 1884), 149; K. R. Cama, “Zoroastrians and Freemasonry,” in The Collected Works of K. R. Cama, vol. 1 (Bombay, 1968), 358–86, at 360.

58 K. R. Cama, “Freemasonry among the Natives of Bombay,” in The Collected Works of K. R. Cama, 387–406, at 387; Cama, “Zoroastrians and Freemasonry,” 362.

59 Gilmartin, David, “Rethinking the Public through the Lens of Sovereignty,” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 38/3 (2015), 371–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 381.

60 Visana, “Vernacular Liberalism,” 790–97; Koditschek, Liberalism, Imperialism and the Historical Imagination, 293–4.

61 Wolf, O., “Vinayak Damodar Savarkar's ‘Strategic Agnosticism’: A Compilation of His Socio-political Philosophy and Worldview,” Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics 51 (2010), 1–27Google Scholar, at 5; V. D. Savarkar, “Majya Athvani,” quoted and translated in Matthew Lederle, Philosophical Trends in Modern Maharashtra (Bombay, 1976), 280.

62 Tatya [Savarkar] to Bal, 6 July 1920, in V. D. Savarkar, An Echo from Andamans, ed. V. V. Kelkar (Bombay, 1924), 87.

63 Weekly report of the director of criminal intelligence, 10 Oct. 1908, British Library, London, India Office Records, quoted in Laursen, Ole Birk, “Anarchist Anti-imperialism: Guy Aldred and the Indian Revolutionary Movement 1909–1914,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth Studies 46/2 (2018), 286–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 303.

64 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 7.

65 Ibid., 51, 132.

66 Ibid., 233.

67 Ibid., 433.

68 Ibid., 116, 254, 405.

69 Ibid., 443.

70 Ibid., 326.

71 Oh Martyrs, Dec. 1908, National Archives of India, New Delhi, Home Political Department, Series A.

72 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 420.

73 “Grant of the first East India Company of the island of Bombay,” from 27 March 1669, DNP, notes and jottings, Group 7: political, serial number 16; Naoroji's “Presidential Address,” second Indian National Congress, Calcutta, 1886, in Dadabhai Naoroji, The Grand Little Man of India: Dadabhai Naoroji, Speeches and Writings, vol. 1, ed. Moin Zaidi (New Delhi, 1985), 9–19, at 13–14.

74 Surendranath Banerjea, A Nation in the Making: Being Reminiscences of Fifty Years of Public Life (Bombay, 1963; first published 1925), 61–2.

75 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 420–21.

76 Aurobindo Ghosh, Bande Mataram: Early Political Writings (Pondicherry, 1972), 18, cited in Sartori, Andrew, “The Categorical Logic of Colonial Nationalism: Swadeshi Bengal, 1904–1908,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 23/1–2 (2003), 271–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 273–4.

77 Banerjee, The Mortal God, 84–5.

78 Ibid., 212.

79 Quentin Skinner, “The Republican Ideal of Political Liberty,” in Gisela Bock, Quentin Skinner, and Maurizio Viroli, eds., Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge, 1990), 293–309, at 304.

80 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 9–11.

81 Pincince, “On the Verge of Hindutva,” 54; Darnton, Robert, “Literary Surveillance in the British Raj: The Contradictions of Liberal Imperialism,” Book History 4 (2001), 133–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

82 Joseph Mazzini, An Essay on the Duties of Man: Addressed to Working Men (New York, 1898; first published 1862), 14.

83 Giuseppe Mazzini, “Humanity and Country” (1836), cited in A Cosmopolitanism of Nations: Giuseppe Mazzini's Writings on Democracy, Nation Building, and International Relations, ed. Stefano Recchia and Nadia Urbinati (Princeton, 2010), 53–6, at 55.

84 Stefano Recchia and Nadia Urbinati, “Introduction: Giuseppe Mazzini’s International Political Thought,” in Mazzini, A Cosmopolitanism of Nations, 1–30, at 27–8.

85 Ibid., 9.

86 Giuseppe Mazzini, Mazzini's Letters, trans. A. De Roses Jervis (Westport, 1979), 76.

87 Translated from Marathi by Harindra Srivastava, Five Stormy Years: Savarkar in London (New Delhi, 1983), 33–4.

88 C. A. Bayly, “Liberalism at Large: Mazzini and Nineteenth-Century Indian Thought,” in C. A. Bayly and Eugenio F. Biagini, eds., Giuseppe Mazzini and the Globalisation of Democratic Nationalism 1830–1920 (Oxford, 2008), 355–74, at 355; Bayly, Recovering Liberties, 3.

89 Bayly, “Liberalism at Large,” 360.

90 V. D. Savarkar, Inside the Enemy Camp, trans. V. S. Godbole, at www.savarkarsmarak.com/activityimages/Inside%20the%20Enemy%20Camp.pdf, 60, accessed 30 April 2018.

91 Ibid., 51.

92 Ibid., 67.

93 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 69.

94 Ibid., 79.

95 Downs, Troy, “Host of Midian: The Chapati Circulation and the Indian Revolt of 1857–58,” Studies in History 16 (2000), 75–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wagner, Kim, The Great Fear of 1857: Rumours, Conspiracies and the Making of the Indian Uprising (Oxford, 2010), 61–79Google Scholar.

96 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 77, 227.

97 Ibid., 79–80.

98 Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (1651), ed. Tuck, Richard (Cambridge, 1991)Google Scholar, Ch. 16; Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, vol 3, Hobbes and Civil Service (Cambridge, 2002), Ch. 6.

99 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 40–70, 442.

100 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Of the Social Contract (1762), ed. Gourevitch, Victor (Cambridge, 1997), 60Google Scholar.

101 Savarkar, India the Enemy Camp, 64–5.

102 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 70–71.

103 Tatya [Savarkar] to Bal, 4 Aug. 1918, in Savarkar, An Echo from Andamans, 65.

104 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 4.

105 Confidential report for week ending 26 April 1946, Baroda Records Office, Vadodara (hereafter BRO), Confidential Documents, Bundle 6, File 140, 294.

106 Gandhi, Mohandas K., The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, vol. 20 (Ahmedabad, 1966), 104–5Google Scholar.

107 Devji, Faisal, The Impossible Indian: Gandhi and the Temptations of Violence (London, 2012), 11–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

108 V. D. Savarkar, My Transportation for Life (Bombay, 1984), 271–2.

109 Duncan Kelly, “Popular Sovereignty as State Theory in the Nineteenth Century,” in Richard Bourke and Quentin Skinner, eds., Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, 2016), 270–96, at 277–9.

110 Johann Kaspar Bluntschli, The Theory of the State (Kitchener, 2000), 30–31.

111 Kelly, “Popular Sovereignty,” 278.

112 Bluntschli, Theory of the State, 393.

113 Quoted in Kelly, “Popular Sovereignty,” 273.

114 Ibid., 283.

115 Bluntschli, Theory of the State, 393.

116 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 243–5.

117 Ibid., 233–5.

118 Ibid., 273, emphasis added.

119 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, vii–viii.

120 Ibid., 7–8.

121 Tatya [Savarkar] to Bal, 6 July 1920, in Savarkar, An Echo from Andamans, 90; Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 233.

122 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 398.

123 Ibid., 378.

124 Ibid., 380.

125 Ibid., 356.

126 Ibid., 381.

127 For Savarkar's use of the Bhagavadgita to encourage dutiful action see Chaturvedi, “Rethinking Knowledge.”

128 Savarkar, Indian War of Independence, 29, 147, 156, 162, 192.

129 Ibid., 88–9.

130 Ibid., 366–9.

131 Ibid., 233–4.

132 Ibid., 395, 444.

133 Ibid., 370.

134 Ibid., 62–3, 234; Tatya [Savarkar] to Bal, 15 Feb. 1914, in Savarkar, An Echo from Andamans, 23.

135 Bakshi, S. R., The Making of India and Pakistan: Selected Documents, vol. 3, Ideology of Hindu Mahasabha and Other Political Parties (New Delhi, 1977), 545Google Scholar.

136 Confidential report for week ending 26 April 1946, BRO, Confidential Documents, Bundle 6, File 140, 293.

137 Savarkar to the maharaja of Jaipur, 19 July 1944, NMML, Hindu Mahasabha Papers, C-39, f. 51.

138 Ibid.; Chaturvedi, Vinayak, “Vinayak and Me: ‘Hindutva’ and the Politics of Naming,” Social History 28/2 (2003), 155–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 163.

139 V. D. Savarkar, “Presidential Address at the 19th Session of the All India Hindu Mahasabha,” in V. D. Savarkar, Hindu Sangathan: Its Ideology and Immediate Programme (Bombay, 1940), 1–40, at 11.