Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:25:55.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HUMANISM AND THE ENDS OF EMPIRE, 1945–1960

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

GILI KLIGER
GILI KLIGER*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Harvard University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article situates francophone anticolonial thinkers—including Aimé Césaire, Léopold Sédar Senghor, and Frantz Fanon—within the “humanism debate” in postwar French thought. Drawing on their poetry, prose, speeches, and interviews, this article reconstructs their critique of the humanist tradition that had identified the capacity for reason as the essence of “man.” It then traces their dialogue with approaches to this critique, including existentialism, phenomenology, and surrealism, that circulated in the metropole. The particular ways in which anticolonial thinkers built upon such approaches merit our attention because they force us to revise our understanding of the politics motivating the turn to so-called “antihumanism” in the 1960s. Drawing on recent studies that have highlighted proposals for federalist alternatives to empire entertained prior to national independence, this article suggests that the “federalist imagination” helped to inspire the distinctive mode of criticism developed by certain anticolonial thinkers and taken up by later scholars.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , November 2018 , pp. 773 - 800
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

* I would like to thank Peter E. Gordon, Samuel Moyn, and the anonymous reviewers and editorial team at Modern Intellectual History for their helpful comments and guidance on earlier drafts of this article.

References

1 Césaire, Aimé, Discourse on Colonialism, trans. Pinkham, Joan (New York, 2000), 36Google Scholar.

2 See Rothberg, Michael, Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization (Stanford, 2009)Google Scholar.

3 Of course there were also many European thinkers for whom the Holocaust was indeed enough to prompt a rethinking of Western narratives of progress. Consider Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer's 1944 text Dialectic of Enlightenment. On historiographical revisions to the narrative of Holocaust exceptionalism see Kansteiner, Wulf, “From Exception to Exemplum: The New Approach to Nazism and the ‘Final Solution,’” History & Theory 33/2 (1994), 145–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 On the “crisis of man” see Geroulanos, Stefanos, An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought (Stanford, 2010)Google Scholar; Kleinberg, Ethan, Generation Existential: Heidegger's Philosophy in France, 1927–1961 (Ithaca, 2005)Google Scholar; Greif, Mark, The Age of the Crisis of Man: Thought and Fiction in America, 1933–1973 (Princeton, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Césaire, Discourse, 37.

6 Sédar Senghor, Léopold, “Négritude et modernité ou la Négritude est un humanisme du XXe siècle,” in Senghor, Liberté III: Négritude et civilisation de l'universel (Paris, 1977), 215–42Google Scholar, at 237.

7 Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Signs, trans. McCleary, Richard C. (Evanston, 1964), 122.Google Scholar

8 Césaire, Aimé, The Original 1939 Notebook of a Return to the Native Land: Bilingual Edition, trans. and ed. James Arnold, A. and Eshleman, Clayton (Middletown, CT, 2013), 35.Google Scholar

9 Léopold Sédar Senghor, La poésie de l'action: Conversations avec Mohamed Aziza (Paris, 1980), 85, cited in Gary Wilder, Freedom Time: Negritude, Decolonization, and the Future of the World (Durham, NC, 2015), 54.

10 Fanon, Frantz, The Wretched of the Earth, trans. Philcox, Richard (New York, 2004), 1.Google Scholar

11 See Macey, David, Frantz Fanon: A Biography (New York, 2012), 473Google Scholar.

12 See, notably, Young, Robert, White Mythologies: Writing History and the West (New York, 1990), 158–65Google Scholar.

13 Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (New York, 1970), 387.Google Scholar

14 Cooper, Frederick, Citizenship between Empire and Nation: Remaking France and French Africa, 1945–1960 (Princeton, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilder, Freedom Time.

15 Cited in Baring, Edward, “Liberalism and the Algerian War: The Case of Jacques Derrida,” Critical Inquiry 36/2 (Winter 2010), 239–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 257.

16 Baring has helpfully returned to Derrida's private correspondences from this period, which reveal that between French sovereignty in Algeria and a closed Algerian nationalism, Derrida had hoped there might be a “third way.” See ibid.

17 See Lazarus, Neil, Nationalism and Cultural Practice in the Postcolonial World (Cambridge, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lazarus, The Postcolonial Unconscious (Cambridge, 2011)Google Scholar; Parry, Benita, Postcolonial Studies: A Materialist Critique (London, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Young, White Mythologies, 6.

19 From an Interview with C. L. R. James, Binghamton, New York, spring 1974, cited in Robinson, Cedric J., Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition (Chapel Hill, 1983)Google Scholar, 183 n. 30.

20 See Betts, Raymond F., Assimilation and Association in French Colonial Theory, 1890–1914 (New York, 1961)Google Scholar.

21 See Rosello, Mireille, “Introduction: Aimé Césaire and the Notebook of a Return to My Native Land,” in Aimé Césaire, Notebook of a Return to My Native Land = Cahier d'un retour au pays natal, trans. Rosello, Mireille with Pritchard, Annie (Newcastle upon Tyne, 1995), 9–19.Google Scholar

22 Sédar Senghor, Léopold, “Lycée Louis-le-Grand haut lieu de culture française,” in Senghor, Liberté I: Négritude et Humanisme (Paris, 1964), 403–6Google Scholar, at 405.

23 Cherki, Alice, Frantz Fanon: A Portrait, trans. Benabid, Nadia (Ithaca, 2006)Google Scholar.

24 Senghor, “Lycée Louis-le-Grand,” 404, original emphasis.

25 Leiner, Jacqueline, “Entretien avec Aimé Césaire par Jacqueline Leiner,” Tropiques 1 (1978), v–xxivGoogle Scholar, at viii.

26 The 1947 edition appeared with a preface by André Breton. Césaire served as Breton's guide when he visited Martinique with a group that included Claude Lévi-Strauss. In order to trace some of the shifts in Césaire's thinking before and after the war I cite the 1939 edition.

27 Leiner, “Entretien avec Aimé Césaire,” xiv, original emphasis.

28 Ibid., x; xiii, original emphasis.

29 Césaire, Return, 35.

30 Léopold Sédar Senghor, “Les leçons de Leo Frobenius,” in Senghor, Liberté III, 398–404, at 399.

31 Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth, 235.

32 Césaire, Discourse, 37.

33 Léopold Sédar Senghor, “De la liberté de l’âme ou éloge du métissage”, in Senghor, Liberté I, 98–103, at 98.

34 Senghor, “Les Leçons de Leo Frobenius,” 399.

35 Léopold Sédar Senghor, “Qu'est-ce que la Négritude?”, in Senghor, Liberté III, 90–101, at 92, original emphasis.

36 Léopold Sédar Senghor, “Négritude et Germanité I,” in Senghor, Liberté III, 11–17.

37 Adell, Sandra, “Reading/Writing Négritude: Léopold Senghor and Aimé Césaire,” in Adell, Double-Consciousness/Double Bind: Theoretical Issues in Twentieth-Century Black Literature (Urbana and Chicago, 1994), 29–55Google Scholar, at 33, original emphasis.

38 Senghor, “Négritude et Modernité,” 234.

39 Adell, “Reading/Writing Négritude,” 36.

40 Heidegger, Martin, “Letter on Humanism,” in Heidegger, Basic Writings, ed. Farrell Krell, David (New York, 2008), 213–66Google Scholar, at 217.

41 Ibid., 218.

42 Ibid., 243.

43 Césaire, Return, 37. Arnold argues that “this passage, which is central to Négritude as a concept, is . . . a paraphrase of Frobenius,” the German ethnologist who carried out studies of “Ethiopian” civilization in Germany's African colonies. See Arnold, A. J., “Beyond Postcolonial Césaire: Reading Cahier d'un retour au pays natal Historically,” Forum for Modern Language Studies, 44/3 (2008), 258–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44 Fanon, Frantz, Black Skin, White Masks, trans. Philcox, Richard (New York, 2008), 11Google Scholar.

45 René Depestre, “An Interview with Aimé Césaire,” in Césaire, Discourse on Colonialism, 79–94, at 82.

46 Césaire, Aimé, “Poetry and Knowledge,” trans. James Arnold, A., Sulfur 5 (1982), 17–32Google Scholar, at 17.

47 Depestre, “An Interview with Aimé Césaire,” 84.

48 Ibid., 83.

49 Jacqueline Leiner, “Entretien avec Aimé Césaire,” cited in Robin D. G. Kelley, “A Poetics of Anticolonialism,” in Césaire, Discourse, 7–28, at 17.

50 Léopold Sédar Senghor, “Introduction,” in Senghor, Liberté I, 7–9, at 8–9, original emphasis.

51 Césaire, Return, 45.

52 Chakravorty Spivak, Gayatri, “Subaltern Studies: Deconstructing Historiography,” in Spivak, In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics (New York, 1988), 197–221Google Scholar.

53 Fanon, Frantz, “West Indians and Africans,” in Fanon, Toward the African Revolution: Political Essays, trans. Chevalier, Haakon (New York, 1967), 17–27Google Scholar, at 27.

54 Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 199–200. Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs (Paris, 1952), 182.

55 See Macey, Frantz Fanon, 161.

56 Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 65; Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs, 68.

57 Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 12, 42; Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs, 23, 48.

58 Arnold, “Beyond Postcolonial Césaire,” 264.

59 Sédar Senghor, Léopold, “La négritude, comme culture des peuples noirs, ne saurait être dépassée,” in Senghor, Liberté V: Le dialogue des cultures (Paris, 1993), 95–109Google Scholar, at 107; cited in Wilder, Freedom Time, 52.

60 Wilder, Freedom Time, 52–9.

61 Césaire, Discourse, 33.

62 Senghor, “De la liberté de l’âme,” 101.

63 Césaire, Return, 37.

64 Sartre, Jean-Paul, “Orphée Noir,” in Léopold Sédar Senghor, Anthologie de la nouvelle poésie nègre et malgache de langue française (Paris, 2011), ix–xlivGoogle Scholar, at xli; Sartre, Jean-Paul and MacCombie, John, “Black Orpheus,” Massachusetts Review 6/1 (1964), 13–52Google Scholar, at 49. Cited in Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 112.

65 Arthur, Paige, Unfinished Projects: Decolonization and the Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre (London and New York, 2010)Google Scholar, 35.

66 Ibid., 31–41.

67 Sartre, “Orphée noir,” xiv; Sartre and MacCombie, “Black Orpheus,” 18.

68 Arthur, Unfinished Projects, 37.

69 Ibid., 78.

70 Bachir Diagne, Souleymane, “Négritude,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 edn)Google Scholar, ed. Edward N. Zalta, at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/negritude; see also Diagne, “Rereading Aimé Césaire: Negritude as Creolization,” Small Axe 19/3 (2015), 121–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Diagne, African Art as Philosophy: Senghor, Bergson and the Idea of Negritude, trans. Jeffers, Chike (London and New York, 2011)Google Scholar.

71 Etherington, Ben, “An Answer to the Question: What Is Decolonization? Frantz Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth and Jean-Paul Sartre's Critique of Dialectical Reason,” Modern Intellectual History 13/1 (2016), 151–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 159.

72 Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 112; Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs, 108.

73 Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 114; Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs, 109.

74 Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 206; Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs, 187.

75 See David Macey, Frantz Fanon, 152–97, esp. 166-7.

76 Fanon quotes the following from Jaspers, “There exists among men, because they are men, a solidarity through which each shares responsibility for every injustice and every wrong committed in the world . . . if I have not risked my life in order to prevent the murder of other men, if I have stood silent, I feel guilty.” in Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 68 n. 9; Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs, 71–2 n. 9.

77 Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 69; Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs, 71.

78 Cited in Cooper, Citizenship between Empire and Nation, 187–8, my emphasis.

79 Ibid, 188.

80 Césaire, Discourse, 73.

81 Depestre, “An Interview with Aimé Césaire,” 85.

82 Césaire, Aimé, Nègre je suis, nègre je resterai: Entretiens avec Françoise Vergès (Paris, 2005), 69Google Scholar.

83 Césaire, Aimé, “Letter to Maurice Thorez,” trans. Jeffers, Chike, Social Text 28/2 (2010), 145–52Google Scholar, at 151.

84 Césaire, Discourse, 52.

85 Césaire, “Letter to Maurice Thorez,” 152.

86 Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 28; Fanon, Peau noire, masques blancs, 36.

87 Hiddleston, Jane, “Aimé Césaire and Postcolonial Humanism,” The Modern Language Review 105 (2010), 87–102Google Scholar (99).

88 Léopold Sédar Senghor, “Le problème de la culture,” in Senghor, Liberté I, 93–7, at 96, original emphasis.

89 Senghor, “De la liberté de l’âme,” 102, original emphasis.

90 Senghor, “Le problème de la culture,” 97.

91 Wilder, Freedom Time, 70.

92 See Etherington, “An Answer to the Question: What is Decolonization?”.

93 Césaire, Return, 26–7. Recall the famous passage in Nietzsche's “On the Advantages and Disadvantages of History for Life,” where he notes, the “cattle, grazing as they pass you by: they do not know what is meant by yesterday or today.” Friedrich Nietzsche, “On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Life,” in Nietzsche, Untimely Meditations, ed. Daniel Breazeale, trans. R. J. Hollingdale (Cambridge, 1997), 57–124, at 60.

94 Cooper, Citizenship between Empire and Nation, 9.

95 Léopold Sédar Senghor, “La francophonie comme culture,” in Senghor, Liberté III, 80–89, at 81.

96 Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth, 50.

97 Ibid., 1.

98 Ibid., 236.

99 Ibid., 144. See Hiddleston, Jane, “Fanon, Nationalism, and Humanism: The Paradoxes of the Postcolonial Intellectual,” Irish Journal of French Studies 10 (2010), 115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

100 Derrida, Jacques, “The Ends of Man,” in Derrida, Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, Alan (Chicago, 1972), 111–36Google Scholar, at 114; see also Baring, Edward, The Young Derrida and French Philosophy, 1945–1968 (Cambridge, 2011), 297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

101 Derrida, “The Ends of Man,” 117, 115, 127, original emphasis.

102 Ibid., 118.

103 Ibid., 125, original emphasis.

104 Ibid., 116.

105 Ibid., 134, original emphasis.

106 Ibid.

107 Baring, “Liberalism and the Algerian War,” 245, my italics.

108 Ibid., 241.

109 See Peter E. Gordon, “Hammer without a Master: French Phenomenology and the Origins of Deconstruction (or, How Derrida read Heidegger),” in Bevir, Mark, Hargis, Jill, and Rushing, Sara, eds., Histories of Postmodernism (New York, 2007), 103–30.Google Scholar

110 Bhabha, Homi K., The Location of Culture (London, 1994), 115Google Scholar.

111 Ibid., 63.

112 The case has also been made for postcolonial readings of Senghor and Césaire. As Souleymane Bachir Diagne writes of Senghor, “underneath what we may call [his] ‘strategic essentialism’ the discourse of hybridity is always at work, rendering fluid the identities on display.” Or as Françoise Vergès writes of Césaire, “He retraces the profound inequality that structures European discourse, even when it wishes to be universal; he interrogates the foundational violence that constitutes colonization and places the colonial fact at the heart of Europe and not at its periphery. In that respect, Césaire is a postcolonial writer.” See Diagne, African Art as Philosophy, 15; Françoise Vergès, “Pour une lecture postcoloniale de Césaire,” in Césaire, Nègre je suis, nègre je resterai: Entretiens avec Françoise Vergès, 71–136, at 94.

113 Lazarus, The Postcolonial Unconscious, 162.

114 Macey, Frantz Fanon, 203.

115 Gary Wilder writes, “Current efforts to envision postnational democracy are the unwitting heirs of postwar attempts to invent forms of self-determination without state sovereignty.” See Wilder, Freedom Time, 256.

116 Nancy, Jean-Luc, Being Singular Plural, trans. Richardson, Robert D. and O'Byrne, Anne E. (Stanford, 2000), 36.Google Scholar

117 Senghor, “De la liberté de l’âme,” 99.