Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:08:39.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE FIRST MODERN REALIST: FELIX GILBERT'S MACHIAVELLI AND THE REALIST TRADITION IN INTERNATIONAL THOUGHT*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2015

NICOLAS GUILHOT
NICOLAS GUILHOT*
Affiliation:
Centre national de la recherche scientifique, New York University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the disciplines of political science and international relations, Machiavelli is unanimously considered to be “the first modern realist.” This essay argues that the idea of a realist tradition going from the Renaissance to postwar realism founders when one considers the disrepute of Machiavelli among early international relations theorists. It suggests that the transformation of Machiavelli into a realist thinker took place subsequently, when new historical scholarship, informed by strategic and political considerations related to the transformation of the US into a global power, generated a new picture of the Renaissance. Focusing on the work of Felix Gilbert, and in particular his Machiavelli and Guicciardini, the essay shows how this new interpretation of Machiavelli was shaped by the crisis of the 1930s, the emergence of security studies, and the philanthropic sponsorship of international relations theory.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 681 - 711
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Samuel Moyn and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on a prior version of this paper. I greatly benefited from discussions with Volker Berghahn, Anthony Molho, and Jacques Revel. I am grateful to the participants of the ISERP-Political Theory Network at Columbia University and in particular to Nate Mull; to Tjorborn Knutsen and the participants of an ISA panel on “The Prehistory of IR Theory” in Toronto; and to members of the School of Public and International at the University Ottawa for allowing me to develop the ideas contained in this paper. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) Grant Agreement no [284231].

References

1 Gilbert, Felix, A European Past: Memoirs 1905–1945 (New York, 1988), 65 Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., 4, 39.

3 Ibid., 50, 72–3.

4 Stern, Fritz, “German History in America, 1884–1984,” Central European History, 19/2 (1986), 131–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 158.

5 Felix Gilbert to Edward Mead Earle, 1 Feb. 1946, Folder “Correspondence, Gilbert, Felix, 1946”, Box 16, Correspondence F-G, MC020, Edward Mead Earle Papers, 1894–1954, Public Policy Papers, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library.

6 “Grant in aid to Bryn Mawr College,” 23 Feb. 1955, Folder 4137, Box 484, Series 200S, Research Group 1.2, Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, NY.

7 Meinecke, Friedrich, The German Catastrophe: Reflections and Recollections, trans. Fay, Sidney B. (Cambridge, MA, 1950), 51 Google Scholar. See also Bock, Gisela, “Meinecke, Machiavelli und der Nationalsozialismus,” in Bock, Gisela and Schönpflug, Daniel, eds., Friedrich Meinecke in seiner Zeit (Stuttgart, 2006), 146–75Google Scholar.

8 Gunnell, John G., Political Theory: Tradition and Interpretation (Cambridge, MA, 1979), 96 Google Scholar.

9 Wolforth, William, “Realism,” in Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan, eds., The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford, 2009), 131–49Google Scholar, at 132, emphasis mine.

10 Schuman, Frederick L., International Politics (New York, 1969), 63 Google Scholar, 64.

11 Carr, E. H., The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939 (London, 1939), 63 Google Scholar.

12 On the fraught relation between realism and political rationalism see Guilhot, Nicolas, “The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and the Birth of IR Theory,” International Political Sociology, 2/4 (2008), 281–304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 On the English school see Dunne, Tim, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (London, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Butterfield, Herbert, The Statecraft of Machiavelli (New York and London, 1960), 22 Google Scholar.

15 Ibid., 63.

16 Ibid., 21, 18. See also Guicciardini, Francesco, Ricordi (Milan, 1999), 136 Google Scholar.

17 Butterfield, The Statecraft of Machiavelli, 46. A view still found, for instance, in Tuck, Richard, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford, 1999), 10 Google Scholar.

18 Butterfield, The Statecraft of Machiavelli, 62, emphasis mine.

19 Ibid., 94.

20 Ibid., 10.

21 Ritter, Gerhard, The Corrupting Influence of Power (Hadleigh, 1952)Google Scholar. The book was originally published in 1940 under the title Machtsaat und Utopie and revised after the war. On Ritter see Moyn, Samuel, “The First Historian of Human Rights,” American Historical Review, 116/1 (2011), 58–79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Niebuhr, Reinhold, “Augustine's Political Realism,” in The Essential Reinhold Niebuhr, ed. Brown, McAfee (New Haven, 1986), 123–41Google Scholar, at 124.

23 See City of God 4, 4 for Augustine's oft-quoted judgment about politics and justice.

24 Reinhold Niebuhr, “The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness,” in The Essential Reinhold Niebuhr, 160–81, at 165.

25 Morgenthau, Hans J., “The Machiavellian Utopia,” Ethics, 55/2 (1945), 145–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 145.

26 Morgenthau, Hans J., “The Political Science of E. H. Carr,” World Politics, 1/1 (1948), 127–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 134.

27 Written between 1938 and 1940, these texts are published in Aron, Raymond, Machiavel et les tyrannies modernes (Paris, 1993)Google Scholar. See Audier, Serge, Raymond Aron: La démocratie conflictuelle (Paris, 2004)Google Scholar.

28 See Mannheim, Karl, Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge (London, 1936), 125 Google Scholar.

29 Aron, Machiavel et les tyrannies modernes, 61.

30 Ibid., 122.

31 Ibid., 368.

32 Galli, Carlo, Lo sguardo di Giano: Saggi su Carl Schmitt (Bologna, 2008), 84–7Google Scholar.

33 Schmitt, Carl, Dictatorship, trans. Hoelzl, Michael and Ward, Graham (Cambridge, 2014), 6–7 Google Scholar.

34 Croce, Benedetto, Etica e politica (Milan, 1994), 292 Google Scholar.

35 As noted in Cochrane, Eric W., “Machiavelli: 1940–1960,” Journal of Modern History, 33/2 (1961), 113–36Google Scholar, at 115.

36 Cassirer, Ernst, The Myth of the State (New Haven, 1946), 128 Google Scholar.

37 Gilbert, Felix, “Book Review: The Statecraft of Machiavelli, by Herbert Butterfield,” Renaissance News, 10/3 (1957), 157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 The main source for Gilbert's biography before 1945 remains Gilbert, A European Past. See the reviews by Schorske, Carl E., “Survivor of a Lost World,” New York Review of Books, 35/17 (1988), 42–3Google Scholar; and Terza, Dante della, “Il passato europeo di Felix Gilbert,” Belfagor, 44/1 (1989), 689–95Google Scholar.

39 Gilbert, A European Past, 26, 27.

40 Ibid., 27.

41 Gilbert, Felix, History: Choice and Commitment (Cambridge, MA, 1977), 86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Momigliano, Arnaldo, Sesto contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico (Rome, 1980), 770 Google Scholar, original emphasis.

43 Gilbert, A European Past, 72.

44 Ibid., 172.

45 “Machiavelli and Guicciardini . . . proceeded from political and historical concepts which were the common property of a whole group of Florentine writers.” Gilbert, Felix, “Bernardo Rucellai and the Orti Oricellari: A Study on the Origin of Modern Political Thought,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 12 (1949), 101–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 102. See also Gilbert, Felix, “Machiavelli and Guicciardini,” Journal of the Warburg Institute, 2/3 (1939), 263–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Gilbert, Felix, Machiavelli and Guicciardini (New York, 1984), 159 Google Scholar.

47 Meinecke, Friedrich, Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’Etat and Its Place in Modern History, trans. Scott, Douglas (New Brunswick, 1998), 425 Google Scholar. See also Antoni, Carlo, Dallo storicismo alla sociologia (Firenze, 1973), 112–20Google Scholar.

48 Meinecke, Machiavellism, 429.

49 Tessitore, Fulvio, Interpretazione dello storicismo (Pisa, 2006), 72, original emphasisGoogle Scholar.

50 Meinecke observed that he and his German colleagues had experienced defeat and could see better “the terrible antinomy between the ideals of rational morality and the actual processes and causal connections of history,” something that was lost on Croce because, as a victor, he stood “on the happier and sunnier side of life.” Meinecke, Machiavellism, 432.

51 Friedrich Meinecke, “Nationalismus und nationale Idee,” in Meinecke, , Die deutsche Erhebung von 1914 (Stuttgart, 1915), 98 Google Scholar; quoted in Negri, Antonio, Saggi sullo storicismo tedesco: Dilthey e Meinecke (Milan, 1959), 211 Google Scholar.

52 Gilbert, Felix, “The Humanist Concept of the Prince and The Prince of Machiavelli,” Journal of Modern History, 11/4 (1939), 449–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Gilbert, Felix, “Political Thought of the Renaissance and Reformation: A Report on Recent Scholarship,” Huntington Library Quarterly, 4/4 (1941), 443–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 449.

54 Meinecke, The German Catastrophe, 54, 52.

55 Ibid., 52.

56 Meinecke, Friedrich, “Ranke und Burckhardt,” in Meinecke, , Aphorismen und Skizzen zur Geschichte (Stuttgart, 1948), 143–65Google Scholar, at 147.

57 On Burckhardt and Machiavelli see Trevor-Roper, Hugh, History and the Enlightenment (New Haven, 2010), 256 Google Scholar. On the Cold War context of the turn to Burckhardt see Gossman, Lionel, “Jacob Burckhardt: Cold War Liberal?”, Journal of Modern History, 74/3 (2002), 538–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Gilbert, Machiavelli and Guicciardini, 4.

59 Gilbert, Felix, History: Politics or Culture? Reflections on Ranke and Burckhardt (Princeton, 1990), 62 Google ScholarPubMed. For an overview of the Ranke-Burckhardt discussion see Herkless, J. L., “Meinecke and the Rank-Burckhardt Problem,” History and Theory, 93 (1970), 290–321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Molho, Anthony, “The Italian Renaissance, Made in USA,” in Molho, Anthony and Wood, Gordon S., eds., Imagined Histories: American Historians Interpret the Past (Princeton, 1998), 263–94Google Scholar, at 274.

61 Gilbert, Machiavelli and Guicciardini, 129, 150.

62 Pedullà, Gabriele, “Machiavelli dopo Auschwitz,” in Gilbert, Felix, Machiavelli e Guicciardini (Turin, 2012), vii–xxxix Google Scholar, at xxix, xxvii.

63 Gilbert, Machiavelli and Guicciardini, 150.

64 Gilbert's first article on Machiavelli was published in 1937: Gilbert, Felix, “Machiavelli in an Unknown Contemporary Dialogue,” Journal of the Warburg Institute, 1/2 (1937), 163–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Craig, Gordon A., “Felix Gilbert (21 May 1905–14 February 1991),” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 137/1 (1993), 130–36Google Scholar, at 132.

66 See Eckbladh, David, “Present at the Creation: Edward Mead Earle and the Depression-Era Origins of Security Studies,” International Security, 36/3 (2011), 107–41Google Scholar; Inderjeet Parmar, Edward Mead Earle and the Rise of Realism in the United States Academy, Manchester Papers in Politics 3/01 (Manchester 2000).

67 Gilbert, A European Past, 106.

68 Eckbladh, “Present at the Creation,” 115.

69 Parmar, “Edward Mead Earle,” 2.

70 Edward Mead Earle, “The Princeton Program of Military Studies,” March 1942, Box 24, Folder “Professional Activities—Princeton Militarty Studies Group—1941,” MC020, Edward Mead Earle Papers, 1894–1954, Public Policy Papers, Department of Rare Books and Special Collections, Princeton University Library, at 3.

71 Gilbert, Felix, “Machiavelli: The Renaissance of the Art of War,” in Earle, Edward Mead, Craig, Gordon A., and Gilbert, Felix, eds., Makers of Modern Strategy (Princeton, 1943), 3–25 Google Scholar, at 3.

72 Gilbert, A European Past, 176.

73 Gilbert, Felix, To the Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign Policy (Princeton, 1961), 136 Google Scholar.

74 Ibid., 134.

75 Katz, Barry, “German Historians in the Office of Strategic Services,” in Lehmann, Hartmut and Sheehan, James J., eds., An Interrupted Past: German-Speaking Historians in the United States after 1933 (Washington, DC and Cambridge, 1991), 136–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 139.

76 See Connell, William J., “The Republican Tradition, in and out of Florence,” in Weinstein, Donald and Hotchkiss, Valerie R., eds., Girolamo Savonarola: Piety, Prophecy and Politics in Renaissance Florence (Dallas, 1994), 95–105 Google Scholar.

77 Fubini, Riccardo, “Renaissance Historian: The Career of Hans Baron,” Journal of Modern History, 62/3 (1992), 541–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Gilbert, A European Past, 43.

79 See his cautionary observations in Gilbert, Felix, “Bicentennial Reflections,” Foreign Affairs, 54/4 (1976), 635–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Along these lines see Moulakis, Athanasios, Republican Realism in Renaissance Florence: Francesco Guicciardini's Discorso di Logrogno (Lanham, MD, 1998), 2 Google Scholar.

81 Gilbert, Machiavelli and Guicciardini, 138.

82 The notion that constitutional matters resolved themselves into political practice was crucial to the Tuscan school of historical realism which influenced Gilbert. See de Caprariis, Vittorio, Francesco Guicciardini dalla politica alla storia (Naples, 1950)Google Scholar; Anzilotti, Antonio, La crisi costituzionale della Repubblica fiorentina (Florence, 1911)Google Scholar; Rudolf von Albertini, Das florentinische Staatsbewusstsein im Übergang von der Republik zum Prinzipat (Bern, 1955). On Tuscan realism see the introduction by Luigi Russo in Anzilotti, Antonio, Movimenti e constrasti per l’unità italiana (Milan, 1964), xxxi Google Scholar; as well as Ottokar, Nicola, “Antonio Anzilotti,” Leonardo: Rassegna mensile della cultura italiana, 1/1 (1925), 12–13 Google Scholar. I am grateful to Anthony Molho for drawing my attention to their importance for Gilbert.

83 Gilbert, To the Farewell Address, 92, emphasis mine.

84 Ibid., 103.

85 Gilbert, “The Humanist Concept of the Prince,” 450, 470.

86 Gilbert, Machiavelli and Guicciardini, 156–7.

87 Ibid., 157, 198.

88 Ibid., 157.

89 Ibid., 200.

90 “No homage could match such a name.”

91 Felix Gilbert, “Political Power and Academic Responsibility: Reflections on Friedrich Meinecke's Drei Generationen deutscher Gerlehrtenpolitik,” in Krieger, Leonard and Stern, Fritz, eds., The Responsibility of Power: Historical Essays in Honor of Hajo Holborn (New York, 1967), 402–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 406.

92 Quoted in Bock, “Meinecke, Machiavelli und der Nationalsozialismus,” 168.

93 Ritter, The Corrupting Influence of Power, 183.

94 See Simard, Augustin, “La raison d’état constitutionnelle,” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 45/1 (2012), 163–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 Friedrich, Carl J., Constitutional Reason of State: The Survival of the Constitutional Order (Providence, RI, 1957), 2 Google Scholar. On Schmitt's influence see Lietzmann, Hans J., “Von der konstitutionellen zur totalitären Diktatur: Carl Joachim Friedrichs Totalitarismustheorie,” in Söllner, Alfons, Walkenhaus, Ralf, and Wieland, Karin, eds., Totalitarismus: Eine Ideengeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts (Berlin, 1997), 174–92Google Scholar.

96 Friedrich, Carl J., “On Rereading Machiavelli and Althusius: Reason, Rationality, and Religion,” in Friedrich, , ed., Rational Decision (New York, 1964), 177–96Google Scholar, at 180: “The need for deciding in time, the deadline, the kairos, are aspects of all decision-making which, although themselves part of the rationality of the process, are in turn contingent and do not permit of reasoned elaboration beyond a certain point.”

97 Gilbert, Felix, “ Constitutional Reason of State: The Survival of the Constitutional Order by C. J. Friedrich (Book Review),” American Historical Review, 64/1 (1958), 68–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 68.

98 Katznelson, Ira, Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of our Time (New York, 2013)Google Scholar.

99 On this notion see Lazar, Nomi Claire, States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies (Cambridge, 2009), 24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 Machiavelli established a “demarcation between himself and his ‘idealist’ predecessors.” Gilbert, “The Humanist Concept of the Prince,” 450. The last chapter of The Prince was probably appended at a later date because its “emotional idealism” did not fit with the preceding “realism.” Gilbert, Felix, “The Concept of Nationalism in Machiavelli's Prince,” Studies in the Renaissance, 1 (1954), 38–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 38–9.

101 Guilhot, Nicolas, ed., The Invention of International Relations: The Rockefeller Foundation, Realism, and the Making of IR Theory (New York, 2011)Google Scholar.

102 Gilbert, A European Past, 84.

103 Interview with Felix Gilbert, Kenneth W. Thompson, 17 May 1954, Folder 4137, Box 484, Series 200S, Record Group 1.2, Rockefeller Foundation Archives, RAC, Tarrytown, NY.

104 Felix Gilbert to Kenneth W. Thompson, 10 Dec. 1954, Folder 4137, Box 484, Series 200S, RG 1.2, RF, RAC.

105 Hans J. Morgenthau to Kenneth W. Thompson, 31 Jan. 1955, Folder 4137, Box 484, Series 200S, RG 1.2, RF, RAC.

106 Hajo Holborn to Kenneth W. Thompson, 31 Jan. 1955, Folder 4137, Box 484, Series 200S, RG 1.2, RF, RAC. See Otto P. Planfze, “The Americanization of Hajo Holborn,” in Lehmann and Sheehan, An Interrupted Past, 170–79.

107 “Grant in aid to Bryn Mawr College,” 23 Feb. 1955, Folder 4137, Box 484, Series 200S, RG 1.2, RF, RAC.

108 Greenberg, Karen J., “‘Uphill Work’: The German Refugee Historians and American Institutions of Higher Learning,” in Lehmann, and Sheehan, , An Interrupted Past, 94–101 Google Scholar, at 100.

109 Guilhot, The Invention of International Relations.

110 Gilbert, Machiavelli and Guicciardini, 199.

111 Edward Mead Earle, “The Princeton Program of Military Studies,” 3.

112 Shklar, Judith N., “Decisionism,” in Friedrich, Carl J., ed., Rational Decision (New Brunswick, 1964), 3–17, at 12–13Google Scholar.