Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:28:01.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Did Indian Big Business Pursue a Policy of Economic Nationalism1 in the Interwar Years? A New Window to an Old Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

MANALI CHAKRABARTI
MANALI CHAKRABARTI*
Affiliation:
Institute of Development Studies, Kolkata, Calcutta University Alipore Campus, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Indian big business campaigned for economically nationalistic policies during the interwar period. Existing scholarship is sharply divided as to the reason for the same. One group of scholars claim that Indian big business as a class rose above its economic interests and actively joined and even led the anti-imperial nationalist movement during the period. The other group contests the above view and proposes that Indian big business was guided by business interests while rallying for economic nationalism. Significantly the interwar period is also marked by a growing antagonism between Indian big business and European commercial class apparently on racial lines, and they held diametrically opposite positions on most issues of commercial relevance. This development is cited as evidence in support of the former view. In this paper I present data of the European business collective of Kanpur, that exhibited almost identical positions as Indian big business, on several significant economic and political issues during the interwar period. From a detailed analysis of the nature of this collective (that had interests in cotton textiles, leather and sugar, amongst others) I have tried to re-configure the debate on the character of Indian big business during the interwar period.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , July 2009 , pp. 979 - 1038
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annual Reports of the Upper India Chamber of Commerce, Kanpur, for the years 1900–1939Google Scholar
Anstey, V. 1936. The Economic Development of India. Third edition. London: Longman's Green.Google Scholar
Bagchi, A. K.‘Colonialism and Nature of Capitalist Enterprise In India.’ Economic and Political Weekly 23 (31)(1988): pp. PE38–PE50.Google Scholar
Bagchi, A. K. 1992. ‘European and Indian Entrepreneurship in India 1900–30.’ In Ray, R. K. (ed.), Entrepreneurship, pp. 157–186.Google Scholar
Bagchi, A. K. 1972. Private Investment in India, 1900–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, D. 1999. Colonialism in Action: Trade Development and Dependence in Late Colonial India. New Delhi, India: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, S.‘Capital and Labour in Bombay City 1928–29.’ Economic and Political Weekly 16 (42–43): pp. PE36–PE44.Google Scholar
Buchanan, D. H. 1934. The Development of Capitalistic Enterprise in India. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Centenary Souvenir. 1988. Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India: Upper India Chamber of Commerce.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, M. 2003. Industrialisation Process of Kanpur City: 1914 to 1945. PhD dissertation, Jadavpur University.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, M.‘Kanpur: A City That Was.’ Seminar 432 (1995): pp. 34–37.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, M. and Chatterjee, B.. 2006. ‘Business Conduct in Late Colonial India: European Business in Kanpur 1900–1939.’ Economic and Political Weekly 41 (10): pp. 904–911.Google Scholar
Chandavarkar, R. 1994. The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940. New Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, B. 1979. ‘The Indian Capitalist Class and Imperialism before 1947.’ In Chandra, B., Nationalism and Colonialism in Modern India. New Delhi, India: Orient Longman, pp. 140–170.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. C. 1908. Notes on the Industries of the United Provinces. Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India: Government Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, B. 1992. Trade Tariffs and Empire: Lancashire and British Policy in India 1919–1939. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, p. 89.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A. ‘Structure of the Labour Market in Colonial India.’ Economic and Political Weekly, Nos. 44–46 (1981): pp. 1781–1806.Google Scholar
Davis, K. 1951. The Population of India and Pakistan. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Desai, A. V. 1968. ‘The Original Parsi Enterprise.’ Indian Economic and Social History Review 4: pp. 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, C. J. 1978. ‘The End of the Imperialism of Free Trade: The Eclipse of the Lancashire Lobby and the Concession of Fiscal Autonomy to India.’ In Dewey, C. J. and Hopkins, A. G. (eds.) Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. C. 1904. The Economic History of India in the Victorian Age. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
‘Economic Nationalism.’ 2007. In Wikipedia. Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_nationalism. 23rd August, 2007Google Scholar
Gadgil, D. R. 1942. The Industrial Evolution of India in Recent Times. Bombay, Maharashtra, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gadgil, D. R. 1951. Business Communities in India. New York: International Secretariat Institute of Pacific Relations.Google Scholar
Gadgil, D. R., , D. R. 1942. Business Communities in India. New York: International Secretariat Institute of Pacific Relations. S.Google Scholar
Gadgil, D. R. and Namjoshi, N. V.. 1959. Origins of the Modern Indian Business Class: An Interim Report. New York: International Secretariat Institute of Pacific Relations.Google Scholar
Golden Jubilee Souvenir. 1936. Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India: Upper India Chamber of Commerce, p. 6.Google Scholar
Goswami, O. 1982. ‘Collaboration and Conflict: European and Indian Capitalists and the Jute Economy of Bengal, 1919–1939.’ Indian Economic and Social History Review 19 (2): pp. 141–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, O.. 1992. ‘Sahibs Babus and Banias: Change in Industrial Control in Eastern India.’ In Ray, R. K. (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Industry in India 1800–1947, pp. 228–259.Google Scholar
Guha, A.‘The Compradore Role of Parsi Seths 1720–1850.’ Economic and Political Weekly 5 (45) (November 1970). pp. 1933–1936.Google Scholar
Guha, A. (1984) ‘More about Parsi Seths: Their Roots, Entrepreneurship and Compradore Role, 1650–1918.’ In Tripathi, D. (ed.), Business Communities, pp. 109–150.Google Scholar
Gupta, P. S. 1987. ‘State and Business in India in the Age of Discriminating Protection.’ In Tripathi, D. (ed.) State and Business in India. Delhi, India: Manohar, pp. 157–216.Google Scholar
Harris, F. R. 1958. Jamsetjee Nusserwanjee Tata: A Chronicle of his Life. Bombay, Maharashtra, India: Blackie.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. 1975. Shri Ram: A Study in Entrepreneurship and Business Management. New Delhi: Orient Langman.Google Scholar
Joshi, C. 2003. Lost Worlds: Indian Labour and Its Forgotten Histories. Delhi, India: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Khanolkar, G. D. 1969. Walchand Hirachand. Bombay, Maharashtra, India: Walchand.Google Scholar
Kling, B. 1966. ‘The Origin of the Managing Agency System in India.’ Journal of Asian Studies 26 (1): pp 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R. 1983. ‘Family and Factory: Women in the Bombay Cotton Textile Industry, 1919–1939.’ Economic and Political Weekly, No. 1: pp. 922–923.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, S. R. B. 1993. The Indian Cotton Mill Industry and the Legacy of Swadeshi, 1900–1985. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Markovits, C. 1985. Indian Business and Nationalist Politics, 1931–39: The Indigenous Capitalist Class and the Rise of the Congress Party. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, S. D. 1954. The Cotton Mills of India 1854–1954. Bombay, Maharshtra, India: Textile Association, pp. 66–71.Google Scholar
Morris, M. D. 1987. ‘Indian Industry and Business in the Age of Lasseiz-Faire.’ In Tripathi, D. (ed.) State and Business in India, pp. 123–156, especially p. 154 n. 4.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A. 2002. Imperialism, Nationalism and the Making of the Indian Capitalist Class: 1920–1947. New Delhi, India: Sage.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Action and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pandey, G. 1978. The Ascendancy of the Congress in Uttar Pradesh 1926–1934: A Study in Imperfect Mobilisation. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, p 218.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. M. 1970. As the Labour Organises: A Study of Unionism in Kanpur Cotton Textile Industry. New Delhi, India: Sri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations.Google Scholar
Pavlov, V. I. 1964. The Indian Capitalist Class. New Delhi, India: Peoples' Publishing House.Google Scholar
Ray, R. K. (ed.). 1992. Entrepreneurship and Industry in India, 1800–1947. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ray, R. K. 1979. Industrialisation in India: Growth and Conflict in the Private Corporate Sector, 1914–47. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rothermund, D.‘British Foreign Trade Policy in India during the Great Depression,1929–1939.’ Indian Economic and Social History Review, 18 (3–4) (1981), pp. 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, S. 1983. Modern India 1885–1947. Madras, Tamil Nadu, India: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Saul, S. B. 1960. Studies in British Overseas Trade: 1870–1914. Liverpool, Merseyside, UK: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1992. ‘The Patterns of British Enterprise in India 1854–1914: A Causal Analysis.’ In Ray, R. K. (ed.) Entrepreneurship, pp. 109–126.Google Scholar
Sen, S. 1997. Working Class of India: History of Emergence and Movement 1830–1990. Calcutta, West Bengal, India: K. P. Bagchi.Google Scholar
Silver Jubilee Souvenir, 1962. 1937–1962. Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India: Employers' Association of Northern India.Google Scholar
Sinha, N. K. 1967. ‘Indian Enterprise: Its Failure in Calcutta (1800–1848).’ Bengal Past and Present (July–December), Diamond Jubilee Number: pp. 112–123.Google Scholar
Timberg, T. A. 1978. The Marwaris: From Traders to Industrialists. Delhi, India: Vikas.Google Scholar
Tripathi, D. (ed.). 1984. Business Communities of India: A historical Perspective. Delhi, India: Manohar.Google Scholar
Tripathi, D. 1978. Dynamics of a Tradition: Kasturbhai Lalbhai and His Entrepreneurship. Delhi, India: Manohar.Google Scholar
Tripathi, L. K. and Arora, N. P.. 1958. Kanpur Ka Itihaas. Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh: Kanpur Itihaas Samiti.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. R. 1979. Political Economy of the Raj, 1914–1947: The Economic Decolonisation of India. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wavell, L. 1973. The Viceroy's Journal. Edited by Moon, P.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1958. ‘The Religion of India.’ In Gerth, H. H. and Martindale, Bon (eds.), The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Yelland, Z. 1994. The British in Cawnpore 1857–1901. Norwich, Norfolk, UK: Michael Russel.Google Scholar
Yelland, Z. 1987. Traders and Nabobs: The British in Cawnpore 1765–1857. Wiltshire, UK: Michael Russel.Google Scholar