Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2018
Drawing on field research principally from contexts of medical blood donation in North India, this article describes how gifts that are given often critique—by obviation—those that remain ungiven: the care not provided by the Indian state for Bhopal survivors, the family members unwilling to donate blood for their transfusion-requiring relative, and so on. In this way, giving can come to look like a form of criticism. The critiques that acts of giving stage are of absences and deficits: we present cases where large paper hearts donated by survivors of the 1984 Bhopal Gas Disaster to the prime minister of India signal his lack of one, where donated human blood critiques others' unwillingness to do so, where acts of blood donation critique and protest communal violence, and where similar acts of giving over simultaneously highlight a deficit in familial affects and an attempt to resuscitate damaged relational forms. We thus illustrate how critique can operate philanthropically by way of partonomic relations between the given and not-given.
Although we (Dwaipayan and Jacob) carried out our respective stretches of fieldwork in North India independently, in order to avoid unnecessary distraction, we do not differentiate between ourselves when presenting ethnography in this article. Jacob's main stretch of fieldwork on blood donation took place in Delhi and elsewhere in North India from 2003 to 2005, but has continued intermittently since that time. Dwai's fieldwork presented in this article was conducted in 2009, and continued discontinuously until 2011. We would like to thank Sandra Bärnreuther; Aya Ikegame; Arkotong Longkumer; Carlo Caduff; the Dartmouth College South Asia collective; audiences in Tokyo, Copenhagen, Durham, London, and Minneapolis; the special issue editors; and the MAS reviewers and editors for their very helpful comments on earlier versions of the article. All websites were last accessed in February 2017. The authors contributed equally to the article.
1 Cohen, L., ‘Given over to demand: excorporation as commitment’, Contemporary South Asia, vol. 21, no. 3, 2013, pp. 318–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Certainly, this point does not apply to all ‘philanthropic’ acts. For example, the feeding of the poor in temples in India or the giving of alms does not necessarily wage a critique of suffering, but instead may take suffering as a condition of the world, and an opportunity for the exercise of dharma. Here, suffering is naturalized, not critiqued. We thank one of the anonymous reviewers for insisting we make this clearer.
3 Boland, T., ‘Towards an anthropology of critique: the modern experience of liminality and crisis’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 13, no. 3, 2013, pp. 222–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Foucault, M., ‘What is Enlightenment?’, trans. Porter, C., in The Foucault Reader, Rabinow, P. (ed.), Penguin, London, 1991, pp. 32–50Google Scholar.
5 Chatterjee, P., Our Modernity (No. 1), Sephis, Rotterdam, 1997, p. 14Google Scholar.
6 Schaller, J., ‘Sanskritization, caste uplift, and social dissidence in the Sant Ravidas Panth’, in Bhakti Religion in North India: Community Identity and Political Action, Lorenzen, D. N. (ed.), State University of New York Press, Albany, 1995, pp. 106–07Google Scholar.
7 D. N. Lorenzen, ‘Introduction: the historical vicissitudes of Bhakti religion’, in Lorenzen, Bhakti Religion in North India, pp. 18, 24.
8 Copeman, J., Veins of Devotion: Blood Donation and Religious Experience in North India, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, 2009, pp. 4–7.Google Scholar
9 Davis, J., Exchange, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1992Google ScholarPubMed; Corsín Jiménez, A., ‘Well-being in anthropological balance: remarks on proportionality as political imagination’, in Culture and Well-Being: Anthropological Approaches to Freedom and Political Ethics, Corsín Jiménez, A. (ed.), Pluto, London, 2008, pp. 180–97Google Scholar.
10 Ibid., p. 186.
11 Copeman, Veins of Devotion; D. Banerjee, ‘No biosociality in India’, BioSocieties, vol. 6, 2011, pp. 488–92.
12 Godelier, M., The Enigma of the Gift, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1999, p. 5Google Scholar.
13 21 November 2004.
14 Copeman, Veins of Devotion. Guru-seva, in almost all bhakti traditions, is ideally performed without self-interest, either for the devotee or for the guru. Officially, this is also the case for the Sant Nirankaris. In practice, however, devotees were explicit and unabashed in speaking to us about the blessings and other spiritual fruits that their devotional blood-giving would result in.
15 On the background to this violence, see ibid., Chapter 4.
16 Cohen, L., ‘The other kidney: biopolitics beyond recognition’, Body & Society, vol. 7, no. 2–3, 2001, pp. 9–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 Ramaswamy, S., The Goddess and the Nation: Mapping Mother India, Duke University Press, Durham, 2009Google Scholar.
18 Marriott, M., ‘Hindu transactions: diversity without dualism’, in Transactions and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behaviour, Kapferer, B. (ed.), Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Philadelphia, PA, 1976, pp. 109–42Google Scholar; Marriott, M., ‘Constructing an Indian ethnosociology’, in India through Hindu Categories, Marriott, M. (ed.), Sage, New Delhi, 1990, pp. 1–39Google Scholar. See Parry for important comments on Marriott's conceptualization. Parry, J., Death in Banaras, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994Google Scholar. See Copeman, J., ‘The gift and its forms of life in contemporary India’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 45, no. 5, 2011, pp. 1051–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and again Parry, Death in Banaras, on gift-giving as imperilling contact.
19 Lambert, H., ‘Sentiment and substance in North Indian forms of relatedness’, in Cultures of Relatedness, Carsten, J. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 73–89.Google Scholar
20 Carsten, J., After Kinship, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
21 Schneider, D. M., American Kinship: A Cultural Account, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1980 [1968]CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hayden, C., ‘Gender, genetics, and generation: reformulating biology in lesbian kinship’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 10, no. 1, 1995, p. 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Inden, R. B. and Nicholas, R. W., Kinship in Bengali Culture, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1977.Google Scholar
23 Moffatt, M., ‘Deconstructing McKim Marriott's ethnosociology: an outcaste's critique’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 24, no. 2, 1990, pp. 215–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Beteille, A., ‘The reproduction of inequality: occupation, caste and family’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 25, no. 1, 1991, p. 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 Cohen, L., No Aging in India: Modernity, Senility and the Family, Oxford University Press, Delhi, 1998Google Scholar.
26 Nirankari Mandal, Sant, Sant Nirankari Mission: An Introduction, Sant Nirankari Mandal, Delhi, 2003, p. 20.Google Scholar
27 Naipaul, V. S., An Area of Darkness, Vintage, New York, 1964, p. 79Google Scholar.
28 Indira Gandhi's suspension of democracy, 1975–77.
29 Tarlo, E., Unsettling Memories: Narratives of India's ‘Emergency ’, Permanent Black, Delhi, 2003, pp. 27–8Google Scholar; Das, V., Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 2007, p. 173Google Scholar.
30 K. Chadha, ‘Sanjay's men and women’, Hindustan Times, 4 January 2011.
31 Kalathuveettil, T., Serving Youth Today in India, Krstu Jyoti Publications, Bangalore, 1992, p. 245.Google Scholar
32 B. Kang, ‘Toothless tigers’, India Today, 7 February 2004.
33 Siddiqui, A., Son of India, published privately, New Delhi, 1982, p. 271.Google Scholar
34 Singh, J., Sanjay Gandhi and Awakening of Youth Power, Pankaj Publications, Hyderabad, 1977, p. xGoogle Scholar.
35 Ibid., p. 28.
36 Tarlo, Unsettling Memories.
37 Given that most paid donors were/are of low-caste status, the possibility that the ban on selling blood was informed by caste prejudice has been aired (see, for example, http://www.ambedkar.org/News/News071202.htm, [accessed 13 January 2018]—and see poem by Rao discussed below). However, it should also be noted that the move brought India's blood collection policy into line with international health protocols, which assert that safer blood results from non-remunerated donation.
38 We are again very grateful to one of the anonymous reviewers for whom this story of the politician's daughter whose weight becomes the measure of blood donation brings to mind the story of King Shibi, whose kingdom, and then his flesh, and then his entire body, become the counterweight to a bird who seeks his protection from a predator. Rather than our (the authors’) apparent acceptance of the doctor's description of this event as tamasha, might it not—in light of the story of King Shibi—also be read as yajna and, in particular, the kind of sacrifice that consecrates a king (or, in this case, a politician)? Though responding to this fascinating observation properly might demand another article, we offer several points: the politician in question is a local ‘strong man’ leader of a small Muslim party that is moulded in the image of the Shiv Sena. This does not in the least invalidate the points about King Shibi and the yajna-like nature of the spectacle (instances that are clearly from the Hindu canon). Indeed, we would agree that the template in which a politician is weighed—usually against cash but here against blood—does take its lead from the ritual consecration of the king and that, from the point of view of those political devotees who participated in the event, it probably did form such a consecration (see Copeman on the conjunction of the king, the politician, and blood donation. Copeman, J., ‘Blood will have blood’, Social Analysis, vol. 48, no. 3, 2004, pp. 126–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar). We think, however, that most members of the public would ally with the doctor's point of view of the event as a tamasha. The weighing of politicians against money, and more recently blood, is an established component of the political rally. At a ‘May Day Blood Donation Camp’ in Rajasthan, 104 Congress workers are reported to have donated blood equivalent to the body weight of Shri B. D. Kalla, president of the Rajasthan Pradesh Congress Committee (http://www.congressandesh.com/june-2005/june2005.pdf, [originally accessed February 2017, no longer available]). On the other hand, gurus and temple idols may also be weighed in this way. Gujarat blood donor recruiters related to us the practice of weighing idols of Krishna against donated blood. ‘A 6-foot Krishna might be 200 units,’ said one of them. Also in Gujarat, a blood-donation event called ‘Rakt Tula’ was staged in 2005 at the sixtieth birthday celebrations of the guru Swami Adhyatmananda. Finally, see Jonathan Parry on the mode of gift called tula-dan, which involves the weighing of the donor against the gift to be given. Parry, J., ‘On the moral perils of exchange’, in Money and the Morality of Exchange, Parry, J. and Bloch, M. (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989, pp. 64–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
39 The reference here is to Hansen's schema. Hansen, T., Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001Google Scholar.
40 Copeman, Veins of Devotion, Chapter 8.
41 Times of India, 9 September 2009.
42 Cohen, L., ‘Holi in Banaras and the Mahaland of modernity’, GLQ, vol. 2, no. 1, 1995, pp. 399–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
43 Gould, W., Religion and Conflict in Modern South Asia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011, p. 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
44 DNA, 30 April 2010.
45 Ibid.
46 See Tarlo, Unsettling Memories.
47 We first came across this poem on the alternative Indian news and commentary website Kafila.org (https://kafila.online/2009/02/18/castegender-in-a-poem-by-varavara-rao/, [accessed 13 January 2018]).
48 Copeman, Veins of Devotion; Copeman, J. and Street, A., ‘The image after Strathern: art and persuasive relationality in India's sanguinary politics’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 31, no. 2–3, 2014, pp. 185–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
49 The Hindu, 30 November 2007.