No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Tribal land alienation and Adivasis’ struggle for autonomy: The case of Bhadrachalam Scheduled Area, Telangana, India
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2022
Abstract
Based on a case study of the Bhadrachalam Scheduled Area of Telangana, this article argues that the Adivasis of Central India seek autonomy as a response to their dispossession and to the accumulation of capital taking place in their resource-rich territories. The two main factors that have curtailed Adivasi autonomy through land alienation are analysed. The first is a process of agricultural colonization, wherein settlers belonging to agrarian dominant castes have moved into Adivasi territory and acquired tribal lands, thus dispossessing the original owners and reducing them to daily wage labourers. The second process is the industrialization of tribal areas where raw material is available and manpower is cheap, allowing for rapid accumulation through the exploitation of both nature and labour. Adivasis’ struggle for autonomy is therefore a way to reclaim control over their own resources and to preserve their distinct identity.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Modern Asian Studies , Volume 56 , Special Issue 5: Multiple Worlds of the Adivasi , September 2022 , pp. 1672 - 1690
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
1 Guha, R., 1983, Forestry in British and Post-British India. A historical analysis, Economic and Political Weekly, 18 (44), pp. 1882–96, p. 1883Google Scholar.
2 Bates, C. and Shah, A. (eds), 2014, Savage Attack: Tribal insurgency in India, Delhi, Social Science PressGoogle Scholar.
3 Verghese, A., 2016, British Rule and Tribal Revolts in India: The curious case of Bastar, Modern Asian Studies, 50 (5), pp. 1619–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Elwin, V., 1943, The Aboriginals, London, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar.
5 Ghurye G. S., 1943, The Aborigines—‘so called’—and their Future, Pune, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics.
6 Shah A., 2019, Tribe, Egalitarian Values, Autonomy and the State, in Srivastava S., Arif Y. and Abraham J. (eds), Critical Themes in Indian Sociology, Delhi, Sage, pp. 225–39.
7 Umamaheshwari R., 2014, When Godavari Comes: People's history of a river. Journeys in the zone of the dispossessed, Delhi, Aakar Books.
8 Benbabaali D., 2016, From the Peasant Armed Struggle to the Telangana State: Changes and continuities in a South Indian region's uprisings, Contemporary South Asia, 24 (2), pp. 184–96.
9 Cited in McCully P., 1996, Silenced Rivers. The ecology and politics of large dams, London, Zed Books, p. 2.
10 Agamben, G., 1998. Homo Sacer, Palo Alto, Stanford University Press.
11 Sundar N., 2016, The Burning Forest: India's war in Bastar, Delhi, Juggernaut.
12 Feldman, S. and Geisler, C., 2012, Land Expropriation and Displacement in Bangladesh, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39 (3–4), pp. 971–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Harvey D., 2004, The ‘New’ Imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession, Socialist Register, 40, pp. 63–87.
14 Levien, M., 2018, Dispossession Without Development. Land grabs in neoliberal India, Delhi, Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
15 However, the Lambada presence in this area dates back to the early modern period, as shown in Bhukya B., 2010, Subjugated Nomads: The Lambadas under the rule of the nizams, Delhi, Orient Blackswan.
16 Aiyappan, A., 1948, Report on the Socio-Economic Conditions of the Aboriginal Tribes of the Province of Madras, Madras, Government PressGoogle Scholar.
17 Benbabaali, D., 2018, Caste Dominance and Territory in South India. Understanding Kammas’ socio-spatial mobility, Modern Asian Studies, 52 (6), pp. 1938–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Bhukya B., 2012, The Eternal Colonial Legacy: Adivasis and land assertion in Andhra Agency, in Nathan D. and Xaxa V. (eds), Social Exclusion and Adverse Inclusion: Development and deprivation of Adivasis in India, Delhi, Oxford University Press, pp. 63–80.
19 Rupavath R., 2009, Tribal Land Alienation and Political Movements: Socio-economic patterns from South India, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
20 Girgliani, J. M., 2005, Report on Tribal Land Issues in the Telangana Area, Hyderabad, Government of Andhra PradeshGoogle Scholar.
21 Benbabaali D., 2017, Bhadrachalam Scheduled Area, Telangana, in Shah A., Lerche J., Axelby R., Benbabaali D., Donegan B., Raj J. and Thakur V., Ground Down by Growth: Tribe, caste, class and inequality in twenty-first century India, London, Pluto Press, pp. 115–42.
22 Devi M., 1983, Why Eucalyptus?, Economic and Political Weekly, 18 (32), pp. 1379–81.
23 Samata, 2000, Surviving a Minefield—An Adivasi triumph. A landmark Supreme Court judgement restoring the rights of tribals, Hyderabad, Samata.
24 Nilsen A. G., 2018, Adivasis and the State. Subalternity and citizenship in India's Bhil heartland, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
25 Ramnath M., 2008, Surviving the Forest Rights Act: Between Scylla and Charybdis, Economic and Political Weekly, 43 (9), pp. 37–42.
26 Skaria A., 1997, Shades of Wildness Tribe, Caste, and Gender in Western India, The Journal of Asian Studies, 56 (3), pp. 726–45.
27 Glasfurd, C. L. R., 1868, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement of the Upper Godavery District, Central Provinces, Nagpur, Chief Commissioners Office Press, p. 26.
28 Arnold D., 1982, Rebellious Hillmen: The Gudem-Rampa risings 1839–1924, in Guha R. (ed.), Subaltern Studies I. Writings on South Asian history and society, Delhi, Oxford University Press.
29 Kurup A., 2008, Tribal Law in India: How decentralized administration is extinguishing tribal rights and why autonomous tribal governments are better, Indigenous Law Journal, 7 (1), pp. 87–126, 108–11.
30 Shah, Tribe, Egalitarian Values, Autonomy and the State, pp. 225–39.
31 Sundar N., 2013, Reflections on Civil Liberties, Citizenship, Adivasi Agency and Maoism, Critique of Anthropology, 33 (3), pp. 361–68.
32 Bates C., 1995, Lost Innocents and the Loss of Innocence: Interpreting Adivasi movements in South Asia, in Barnes R. H., Gray A. and Kingsbury B. (eds), Indigenous Peoples of Asia, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–19.
33 Xaxa V., 1999, Tribes as Indigenous People of India, Economic and Political Weekly, 34 (51), pp. 3589–96.
34 Steur L., 2010, Indigenous Identity: Burden or Liberation?, Newsletter of the International Institute for Asian Studies, 53, pp. 26–7.
35 Steur L., 2011, Adivasis, Communism, and the Rise of Indigenism in Kerala, Dialectical Anthropology, 35, pp. 59–76.
36 Bhukya B., 2017, The Roots of the Periphery: A history of the Gonds of Deccan India, Delhi, Oxford University Press.
37 Abbi A., 2012, Declining Adivasi Knowledge Systems and Killing of Linguistic Diversity, in Nathan D. and Xaxa V., Social Exclusion and Adverse Inclusion: Development and deprivation of Adivasis in India, Delhi, Oxford University Press.
38 Communist Party of India (Maoist) Central Committee, 2004, Party Programme: http://www.bannedthought.net/India/CPI-Maoist-Docs/Founding/Programme-pamphlet.pdf, [accessed 24 May 2022].
39 Gledhill J., 2001, Autonomy and Alterity. The dilemmas of Mexican anthropology, Anthropology-Bangladesh blogspot, http://anthropology-bd.blogspot.com/2008/07/autonomy-and-alterity-dilemmas-of.html, [accessed 24 May 2022].
40 Gledhill J., 2014, Indigenous Autonomy, Delinquent States, and the Limits of Resistance, History and Anthropology, 25 (4), pp. 507–29, p. 513.
41 Ibid., p. 522.
42 Escobar A., 2008, Territories of Difference. Place, movements, life, redes, Durham, Duke University Press, p. 18.
43 Bates C., 1995, Race, Caste and Tribe in Central India: The early origins of Indian anthropometry, in Robb, P. (ed.), The Concept of Race in South Asia, Delhi, Oxford University Press.
44 Karlsson B. G., 2003, Anthropology and the ‘Indigenous Slot’: Claims to and debates about indigenous peoples’ status in India, Critique of Anthropology, 23 (4), pp. 403–23.
45 Benbabaali, Caste Dominance and Territory in South India, pp. 1938–76.
46 Sanyal, K., 2007, Rethinking Capitalist Development: Primitive accumulation, governmentality and post-colonial capitalism, Delhi, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar.