Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:16:53.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transformation of Authority in Rural India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Oliver Mendelsohn
Oliver Mendelsohn
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Who or what constitutes the dominant power and/or authority in village India today? This sort of question is hardly ever amenable to any generally agreed answer for any society, and the Indian case is no exception. But to say this is already to have made a comment on the main stream of post-independence scholarship on agrarian India. Very soon after independence an academic orthodoxy hardened as to the character of agrarian social structure and power. The argument of this paper is that this orthodoxy is no longer valid and that it obscures what is a profound transformation in the character of agrarian India.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 805 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, F. G. 1957. Caste and the Economic Frontier. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Béteille, André. 1965. Caste, Class and Power. Bombay: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chakravarti, Anand. 1975. Contradiction and Change—Emerging Patterns of Authority in a Rajasthan Village. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1955. ‘The Changing status of a Depressed Caste’, in Village India, ed. Marriot, McKim. Chicago: University of chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1965 (1987). ‘Anthropological Notes on Disputes and Law in India’. American Anthropologist, Vol. 67:6, pt II, 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in Cohn, , An anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays. Delhi: Oxford University Press 1987.Google Scholar
Dirks, Nicholas B. 1987. The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dube, S. C. 1968. ‘Caste Dominance and Factionalism’. Contributions to India Sociology (new Series) No. 2, 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1970. Homo Hierarchicus. Delhi: Vikas.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard G. 1971. Kin, Clan, Raja and Rule; State–Hinterland Relations in Preindustrial India. Bombay: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Francine R. and Rao, M. S. A. ed. 1989 and 1990. Dominance and state Power in Modern India. Vols I and II. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Habib, Irfan. 1963. The Agrarian System of Moghul India. New York: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Hasan, S. Nurul. 1969. ‘Zamindars Under the Mughals’, in Land Conrol and Social Structure in Indian History, ed. Frykenberg, R. E.. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Zoya. 1989. ‘Pattern of Resilience Change in Uttar Pradesh Politics’, in Frankel and Rao, 1989.Google Scholar
Kessinger, Tom G. 1979. Vilayatpur 1848–1968. New Delhi: Young Asia.Google Scholar
Ludden, David. 1985. Peasant History in South India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, Oliver. 1981. ‘The Pathology of the Indian Legal System’. Modern Asian Studies, Pt 4, 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, Oliver. 1991. ‘Life and Struggles in the Stone Quarries of India’. The Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, Vol. XXIX, No. 1.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, C. 1832. ‘Minute’ in Report from Select Committee, Evidence, III, Revenue, App. No. 84, 328ff.Google Scholar
Moreland, W. H. 1920. India at the Death of Akbar. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
O'Dwyer, M. F. 1901. Final Report on the Alwar Settlement.Google Scholar
Saran, P. 1973. The Provincial Government of the Mughals 1526–1658. 2nd edn, London: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak. Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. 1955. ‘The Social System of a Mysore Village’, in Village India, ed. Marriott, McKim. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N. 1959. ‘The Dominant Caste in Rampura’. American Anthropologist, Vol. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Burton. 1980. Peasant State and Society in Medieval South India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiser, W. 1936. The Hindu Jajmani System. Lucknow: Lucknow Publishing House.Google Scholar
Wiser, W. and Wiser, C. V. 1930, reprinted 1963. Behind Mud Walls. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar