Article contents
Public Interventions in Agricultural Markets in Malaysia: Rice and Palm Oil
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
This paper explores the goals, nature and results of government interventions into the rice and palm oil markets of Malyasia since independence. Its purpose is to compare the relatively successful way in which the government has promoted the palm oil industry with the failure of interventions in the rice market. The historical comparison of public efforts in these two industries points up the importance of setting consistent goals, of encouraging crops which match the natural resource endowment of the country, of having a private sector which is capable of responding to production incentives, and of letting supply and demand determine prices when designing a strategy of market intervention. Above all, it is important to distinguish programs of intervention based primarily on efficiency criteria from those which seek to perform social welfare (e.g. income support) and political (e.g. food security) functions as well.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990
References
1 Brown, Gilbert, ‘Agricultural Pricing Policies in Developing Countries,’ in Distortions of Agricultural Incentives, edited by Shultz, Theodore (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978), pp. 84–113;Google ScholarBauer, P. T., Dissent on Development, Rev. edn (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976), pp. 70–91;Google ScholarAgarwala, Ramgopal, ‘Price Distortions and Growth in Developing Countries,’ World Bank Staff Working Paper, no. 575 (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1983), pp. 1–45;Google ScholarWorld Bank Development Report, 1986 (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1986). There is as well a significant body of literature relating to the African case where the effects of interventionist policies have been arguably the most catastrophic.Google Scholar See Lofchie, Michael, ‘Political and Economic Origins of African Hunger,’ Journal of Modern African Studies, 13 (1975), pp. 551–67;CrossRefGoogle ScholarWilde, John de, Agriculture, Marketing and Pricing in Sub-Saharan Africa (Los Angeles: African Studies Association, 1984);Google ScholarBates, Robert, Markets and States in Tropical Africa (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981);Google Scholar World Bank, Accelerated Development in Sub-Saharan Africa (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1981).Google Scholar
There is as well a significant body of literature relating to the African case where the effects of interventionist policies have been arguably the most catastrophic. See Michael Lofchie, ‘Political and Economic Origins of African Hunger,’ Journal of Modern African Studies, 13 (1975), pp. 551-67; John de Wilde, Agriculture, Marketing and Pricing in Sub-Saharan Africa (Los Angeles: African Studies Association, 1984); Robert Bates, Markets and States in Tropical Africa (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981); World Bank, Accelerated Development in Sub-Saharan Africa (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1981).
2 Brown, , ‘Agricultural Pricing Policies,’ pp. 84–113;Google ScholarBauer, , Dissent, pp. 70–91; World Bank Development Report, 1986.Google Scholar
3 Tolley, George, Thomas, Vinod, Wong, Chung Ming, Agricultural Price Policies and Developing Countries (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins for the World Bank, 1982), pp. 232–3.Google Scholar
4 Padi is rice which has not yet been milled. Once padi is milled into rice it is ready to be cooked.
5 Selvadurai, S., Agriculture in Peninsular Malaysia, Ministry of Agriculture Bulletin, no. 148 (Kuala Lumpur: Government Printing Department, 1978), p. 49.Google Scholar
6 Ibid., p. 48.
7 The incidence of poverty among padi producers in 1984 was 57.7% as compared to 24.7% in the rural sector overall, 8.2% in the urban sector, and 18.4% in all of Malaysia. Malaysia. Fifth Malaysia Plan, 1986–90, Table 3–1, p. 86.Google Scholar
8 Rudner, Martin, ‘Agricultural Policy and Peasant Social Transformation in Late Colonial Malaya,’ in Issues in Malaysian Development, edited by Jackson, James and Rudner, Martin (Singapore: Heinemann Educational Books, 1979), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
9 Scott, James, Weapons of the Weak (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985). pp. 52–3.Google Scholar
10 Ibid., p. 64.
11 Ibid., p. 68.
12 Ibid., p. 69.
13 Ibid., pp. 70–1.
14 Ibid., pp. 74–5.
15 Selvadurai, S., Padi Farming in West Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, 1972), p. 119.Google Scholar
16 Malaysia. National Agricultural Policy: Oil Palm Industry. May 1984 (draft), Tables 8, 10, 14; pp. 28, 31, 40.Google Scholar
17 Selvadurai, , Agriculture in Peninsular Malaysia, p. 89.Google Scholar
18 Meyanathan, Sahathavan, ‘The Shift from Rubber to Oil Palm Cultivation: Reasons and Policy Implications,’ Paper presented to Sixth Malaysian Economic Convention, May 1980, p. 1.Google Scholar
19 Selvadurai, , Agriculture in Peninsular Malaysia, p. 91.Google Scholar
20 Khera, Harcharan Singh, The Oil Palm Industry of Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya, 1976), pp. 47–81;Google ScholarMoll, H. A. J., The Economics of Oil Palm (Wageningen, The Netherland: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, 1987), pp. 147–53. For a review of studies on profitability, see Sahathavan, ‘Shift from Rubber to Oil Palm,’ pp. 2–4.Google Scholar
21 Malaysia. Federal Land Development Authority (Felda), Annual Report, 1983, p. 16;Google ScholarFifth Malaysia Plan, p. 90.Google Scholar
22 Moll, , Economics of Oil Palm, pp. 137–8.Google Scholar
23 M$ 10 million is the approximate cost of a mill with a capacity of 30 to 36 tonnes of ffb.'s per hour; the average mill capacity in Malaysia at the end of 1985 was just over 30 tonnes of ffb.'s per hour. Ibid., p. 149; Palm Oil Registration and Licensing Authority (PORLA), Annual Report, 1985, p. 11.
24 Barlow, Colin, ‘Oil Palm as a Smallholder Crop,’ Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia (PORIM), Occasional Paper no. 21 (August 1986), Table 1, p. 2.Google Scholar
25 Felda Annual Report, 1983, p. 8.Google Scholar
26 For example, the Malaysian government has spearheaded the counter-attack against the American Soybean Association's campaign to have products containing palm oil labeled a health risk in the United States.
27 Vokes, Richard, ‘State Marketing in a Private Enterprise Economy: The Padi and Rice Market of West Malaysia, 1966–75’ (Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hull, 1978), pp. 192–3.Google Scholar
28 Fifth Malaysia Plan, Table 10–5, p. 329.Google Scholar
29 Hoey, Tan Siew, Malaysia's Rice Policy: A Critical Analysis (Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Strategic and International Studies, 1987), Appendix 2, p. 68.Google Scholar
30 Malaysia. Lembaga Padi dan Beras Negara (LPN).
31 Based on data from LPN and Malaysia. Ministry of Agriculture. Padi Statistics, various issues.
32 Malaysia. Federal Budget. Estimates of Revenue and Expenditures, various years.
33 Chew, T. A. and Ghaffar, R. A., ‘Some Economic Aspects of Drying of Paddy by Farmers in Selangor, Malaysia,’ in Preserving Grain Quality by Aeration and In-store Drying, edited by Champ, B. R. and Highly, E. (Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 1986), pp. 146–51.Google Scholar
34 Shahabudin, Syed Abdul Jabbar, ‘Role and Performance of KLCE in Palm Oil Marketing,’ Proceedings of the International Seminar on Market Development for Palm Oil Products, 23–27 January 1984 (PORIM, 1984), pp. 118–21.Google Scholar
35 Khera, , Oil Palm Industry, pp. 142, 142n.Google Scholar
36 Felda Annual Report, 1983, p. 16;Google ScholarFifth Malaysia Plan, p. 90.Google Scholar
37 Nordin, Jamil, ‘The Export Performance of Malaysian Processed Palm Oil,’ Proceedings of the International Seminar on Market Development for Palm Oil Products, 23–27 January 1984 (PORIM, 1984), pp. 190–1.Google Scholar
38 Business Times (Malaysia), 27 01 1988, p. 20.Google Scholar
39 Malaysia. Ministry of Finance.
- 7
- Cited by