Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:38:03.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Privatization in the Land of Believers: The political economy of privatization in Pakistan*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

KAMAL MUNIR  and
NATALYA NAQVI
KAMAL MUNIR
Affiliation:
Mushtaq Gurmani School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan University of Management Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK Email: [email protected]
NATALYA NAQVI
Affiliation:
Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite theoretical justifications and empirical evidence that state-owned enterprises have played an important role in late development, as well as over three decades of evidence that privatization programmes since the 1980s have had mixed results at best, international financial institutions continue prescribing privatization as a panacea for developing countries. Pakistan is an interesting case to understand why privatization is still considered desirable, because it is one of a set of developing countries that have whole-heartedly implemented Washington Consensus policies. In this context, we analyse privatization in two key economic sectors in Pakistan: energy and banking. Using qualitative and quantitative data, we describe the motivations behind these privatizations, the process by which they were carried out, and analyse the post-privatization performance of these organizations and sectors. We find that in both cases (a) the privatizations failed not only with respect to their stated aims, leading to a decline in national productive capabilities, but also had adverse distributional consequences, shifting the rewards to the buyers while the risks and costs remained with the public sector, and (b) the suboptimal outcomes of the privatizations went largely unchallenged aided by a prevalent neoliberal view amongst the country's economic policy makers and intelligentsia. Our analysis sheds new light on the process by which privatization in the absence of a state with the capacity to discipline business interests has enabled these interests to obtain state-sponsored rents without bringing any of the associated benefits for economic development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 51 , Special Issue 6: Institutions and Economic Development in South Asia , November 2017 , pp. 1695 - 1726
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

The authors would like to thank Salman Khalid for his input on energy privatizations and Umair Mesiya for valuable research assistance.

References

1 Chang, H.-J. and Grabel, I., Reclaiming Development: An Alternative Economic Policy Manual, Zed Books, London, 2004 Google Scholar.

2 Shin, J.-S., ‘Globalization and challenges to the developmental state: a comparison between South Korea and Singapore’, Global Economic Review, vol. 34, no. 4, 2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chang, H.-J., State Owned Enterprise Reform, United Nations, Department for Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), 2007, p. 9 Google Scholar.

3 Nolan, P. and Wang, X., ‘Beyond privatisation: institutional innovation and growth in China's large state-owned enterprises’, World Development, vol. 27, no. 1, 1999, pp. 169–200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Berne, M. and Pogorel, G., ‘Privatization experiences in France’, paper presented at CESifo Conference on Privatization Experiences in the EU, Cadenabbia, Italy, November 2003 Google Scholar; these firms were privatized at various points between 1986 and 2000.

5 J. Willner, ‘Privatization and state ownership in Finland’, CESifo Working Paper No. 1012, Ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich, 2003.

6 Toye, J., ‘Changing perspectives in development economics’, in Rethinking Development Economics, Chang, H.-J. (ed.), Anthem Press, London, 2003 Google Scholar.

7 W. Megginson and J. Netter, ‘From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatisation’, Journal of Economic Literature, June 2001; S. Kikeri and A. F. Kolo, ‘Privatization: trends and recent developments’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3765, 2005.

8 Although most of these countries have recently made policy reversals in this regard; Estache, A. and Trujillo, L., ‘Privatization in Latin America’, in Privatization: Successes and Failures, Roland, G. (ed.), Columbia University Press, New York, 2008, pp. 136–67Google Scholar.

9 Cramer, C., ‘Privatization and adjustment in Mozambique: a “hospital pass”?’, Journal of Southern African Studies, vol. 27, no. 1, 2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Bennell, P., ‘Privatization in sub-Saharan Africa: progress and prospects during the 1990s’, World Development, vol. 25, no. 11, 1997, pp. 1785–1803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kikeri and Kolo, ‘Privatization’.

11 Megginson and Netter, ‘From state to market’; although a high percentage of privatization proceeds came from China, it has privatized mainly its public small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), leaving most large-scale SOEs intact.

12 Kikeri and Kolo, ‘Privatization’.

13 McDonald, A. and Ruiters, G. (eds), Alternatives to Privatization: Public Options for Essential Services in the Global South, Routledge, New York, 2012 Google Scholar.

14 H. Jalilian and J. Weiss, ‘Policy arena: bureaucrats, business and economic growth’, Journal of International Development, September 1997, pp. 877–85.

15 A. Wooldridge, ‘The visible hand: special report on state capitalism’, The Economist, 21 January, 2012.

16 Ibid.

17 W. Glade, ‘Privatization in rent-seeking societies’, World Development, May 1989, pp. 673–82.

18 Noman, O., Economic and Social Progress in Asia: Why Pakistan Did Not Become a Tiger, Oxford University Press, Karachi, 1997 Google Scholar.

19 Khan, M., The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Pakistan 1947–1971, SOAS, University of London, London, 1999 Google Scholar.

20 M. Andrews, ‘State-owned banks, stability, privatization, and growth: practical policy decisions in a world without empirical proof’, International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 5-10, 2005.

21 Chang, H.-J., Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism, Bloomsbury Publishing, New York, 2007 Google Scholar.

22 J. Di John, ‘The political economy of taxation and tax reform in developing countries’, Research Paper (No. 2006/74), UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU), 2006.

23 Indeed, the difficulties advanced countries are facing today in getting their banks to provide loans to the real economy, rather than indulging in speculation, illustrates how even those with a high degree of state capacity can encounter these problems; Chang, State Owned Enterprise Reform.

24 Gerschenkron, A., Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1962 Google Scholar.

25 Nurkse, R., Problems of Capital Formation in Developing Countries, Columbia University Press, New York, 1953 Google Scholar.

26 P. N. Rosenstein-Rodan, ‘Problems of industrialization of eastern and south-eastern Europe’, The Economic Journal, vol. 53, no. 210/211, 1943, pp. 202–11.

27 Hirschman, A., The Strategy of Economic Development, Yale university Press, New Haven, 1958 Google Scholar.

28 Kaldor, N., Strategic Factors in Economic Development, New York, Ithaca, 1967 Google Scholar; Thirlwall, A. P., The Nature of Economic Growth: A Alternative Framework for Understanding the Performance of Nations, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2003 Google Scholar; Chang, H.-J., Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, Anthem Press, London, 2002 Google Scholar.

29 Chang and Grabel, Reclaiming Development; Wade, R., Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1990 Google Scholar; Amsden, A., Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989 Google Scholar; Shin, ‘Globalization and challenges’; Chang, State Owned Enterprise Reform.

30 Chang, H.-J., ‘Public investment management’, National Development Strategy Policy Guidance Note, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and United Nations Development Programme, 2006; Amsden, Asia's Next Giant Google Scholar.

31 Toye, ‘Changing perspectives’.

32 Vickers, J. and Yarrow, G., Privatisation: An Economic Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988 Google Scholar.

33 World Bank, Bureaucrats and Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995 Google Scholar.

34 Bouin, O., ‘The privatization in developing countries: reflections on a panacea’, OECD Policy Brief, vol. 3, 1992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, http://www.oecd.org/dev/1918716.pdf, [accessed 27 July 2017]; Galal, A., Jones, L., Tandon, P., and Vogelsang, I., Welfare Consequences of Selling Public Enterprises: Case Studies from Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, and the UK, World Bank, Washington, 1992 Google Scholar; Kikeri, S., Nellis, J., and Shirley, M., Privatisation: The Lessons of Experience, World Bank, Washington, DC, 1992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 World Bank, Bureaucrats and Business.

36 Bayliss, K. and Fine, B., ‘Beyond bureaucrats in business: a critical review of the World Bank approach to privatization and public sector reform’, Journal of International Development, vol. 10, no. 7, 1998, pp. 841–553.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bayliss, K. and Cramer, C., ‘Privatization and the post-Washington Consensus: in between the lab and the real world’, in Development Policy in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond the Post-Washington Consensus, Fine, B., Lapavitsas, C., and Pincus, J. (eds), Routeledge, London, 2001 Google Scholar.

37 Naughton, B., The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007 Google Scholar.

38 J. Bhagwati, J. N. Bhagwati, and A. Panagariya, ‘Why growth matters: how economic growth in India reduced poverty and the lessons for other developing countries’, Public Affairs, New York, 2013.

39 Amsden, Asia's Next Giant; Wade, Governing the Market; Woo-Cumings, M., The Developmental State, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1999 Google Scholar; Chang, Kicking Away the Ladder; Weiss, L., States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kohli, A., State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Defined by M. H. Khan, ‘Rents, efficiency and growth’, in Rents, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia, M. H. Khan and K. S. Jomo (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, p. 1, as ‘excess income’ which may take the form of higher rates of return in monopolies, the extra income from politically organized transfers such as subsidies, or the extra income that comes from owning scarce resources, whether natural resources or specialized knowledge.

41 Ibid.; Chibber, V., ‘Building a developmental state: the Korean case reconsidered’, Politics and Society, vol. 27, September 1999, pp. 309–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Amsden, A., The Rise of the Rest: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Amsden, Asia's Next Giant; H.-J. Chang, ‘The political economy of industrial policy in Korea’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 17, no. 2, June 1993, pp. 131–57.

43 Amsden, Asia's Next Giant; The Rise of the Rest.

44 Harvey, D., ‘Neoliberalism as creative destruction’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 610, no. 1, 2007, pp. 21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Ibid., p. 35.

46 Zaidi, A., Issues in Pakistan's Economy, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Karachi, 2005 Google Scholar.

47 Zaidi, A., Issues in Pakistan's Economy: A Political Economy Perspective, Oxford University Press, Karachi, 2015 Google Scholar.

48 Malik, A., ‘Power crisis in Pakistan: a crisis in governance?’, PIDE Monograph Series, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2012, p. 2 Google Scholar.

49 Zaidi, Issues in Pakistan's Economy, 2nd edn, pp. 263–70; Janjua, A., History of the State Bank of Pakistan (1977–88), State Bank Printing Press, Karachi, 2003 Google Scholar.

50 Zaidi, Issues in Pakistan's Economy, 2nd edn, pp. 336–45; Janjua, A., History of the State Bank of Pakistan (1988–2003), State Bank Printing Press, Karachi, 2004 Google Scholar.

51 Zaidi, Issues in Pakistan's Economy.

52 Ibid., p. 457.

53 J. Fraser, ‘Lessons from the independent private power experience in Pakistan’, Energy and Mining Sector Board Discussion Paper No. 14, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2005.

54 A. Saleem, ‘The state under trial: an institutional analysis of a policy decision in the Pakistan electricity sector’, dissertation submitted to Lahore University of Management Sciences, 2014.

55 International Monetary Fund, ‘Pakistan: poverty reduction strategy paper’, IMF Country Report No. 10/183, Washington, DC, 2010.

56 Dawn, ‘WAPDA, KESC draining resources’, Dawn, 2002, http://www.dawn.com/news/51138/wapda-kesc-draining-resources, [accessed 27 July 2017].

57 Saleem, ‘The state under trial’.

58 Fraser, ‘Lessons’.

59 International Monetary Fund, ‘Pakistan: poverty reduction strategy paper’, IMF Country Report No. 04/24, Washington, DC, 2004, p. 44.

60 Ministry of Water and Power, 2008, cited in International Monetary Fund, ‘Pakistan: poverty reduction strategy paper’, 2010, p. 138.

61 This means the government promised to cover all expenses in addition to guaranteeing a generous profit on top.

62 C. Hill, ‘Power failure’ Institutional Investor, November, 1999.

63 Interview with first author.

64 K. Munir and S. Khalid, ‘Pakistan's power crisis: how did we get here?’, Lahore Journal of Economics, September 2012, pp. 73–82.

65 R. Siddiqui, H. Jalil, M. Nasir, W. S. Malik, and M. Khalid, ‘The cost of unserved energy: evidence from selected industrial cities of Pakistan’, Working Paper No. 2011:75, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2011.

66 I. Hussain, ‘Why privatisation is necessary for economic growth in Pakistan?’, address at the 11th Get Together of the Overseas Universities Alumni Club and the 21st Century Business & Economics Club, Karachi, 12 August 2005, http://www.bis.org/review/r050829c.pdf, [accessed 27 July 2017].

67 State Bank of Pakistan Research Department, ‘Pakistan: Financial sector assessment 2001–2002’, 2002, http://www.sbp.org.pk/publications/fsa-2001-2002/index.htm, [accessed 27 July 2017].

68 Haque, N. Ul, ‘Financial market reform in Pakistan’, The Pakistan Development Review, vol. 36, no. 4 II, 1997, pp. 839–54Google Scholar.

69 Janjua, History of the State Bank of Pakistan (1977–88).

70 Hussain, I., ‘Policy considerations before bank privatization—country experience presentation’, World Bank, International Monetary Fund and Brookings Institution Conference, The Role of State-Owned Financial Institutions: Policy and Practice, Washington, DC, 27 April 2004 Google Scholar.

71 Ibid.

72 All figures are converted to US dollars using the relevant end-of-year exchange rate for the year in which the sale took place.

73 Khan, A., The Impact Privatization in Pakistan, Ferozsons, Karachi, 2012 Google Scholar.

74 Dawn, ‘Two banks in run to buy 51 pc ABL shares’, Dawn, 2004, http://www.dawn.com/news/350620/two-banks-in-run-to-buy-51pc-abl-shares, [accessed 27 July 2017]; Khan, The Impact.

75 Dawn, ‘UBL Sale not really transparent’, Dawn, 2002, http://www.dawn.com/news/56315/ubl-sale-not-really-transparent, [accessed 27 July 2017].

76 Dawn, ‘Court issues notices on petition challenging HBL privatization’, Dawn, 2004, http://www.dawn.com/news/355258/court-issues-notices-on-petition-challenging-hbl-privatization, [accessed 27 July 2017].

77 Dawn, ‘AKF buys HBL for Rs. 22.409 bn’, Dawn, 2003, http://www.dawn.com/news/131655/akf-buys-hbl-for-rs22-409bn, [accessed 27 July 2017]; Khan, The Impact.

78 Burki, A. and Niazi, S., ‘The effects of privatisation, competition and regulation on banking efficiency in Pakistan, 1991–2000’, CRC Conference on: Regulatory Impact Assessment: Strengthening Regulation Policy and Practice, University of Manchester, United Kingdom, 2003 Google Scholar; D. Hardy and E. Patti, ‘Bank reform and bank efficiency in Pakistan’, IMF Working Paper -1/138, International Monetary Fund, 2001; Khan, R. and Aftab, S., ‘Assessing the impact of financial reforms on Pakistan's economy’, Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, vol. 10, no.1, 1994, pp. 99–116 Google Scholar.

79 Munir, K. and Naqvi, N., ‘Pakistan's post-reforms banking sector’, Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 48, no. 47, 2013 Google Scholar.

80 World Bank, World Development Indicators, online database, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator, [accessed 27 July 2017].

81 The fixed rate was 4.5 per cent until 1973, 5 per cent in 1974, and 6 per cent until 1986. It was gradually raised thereafter until 1991, when rates were instead determined through public auction (Janjua, History of the State Bank of Pakistan (1977–88); History of the State Bank of Pakistan (1988–2003)).

82 State Bank of Pakistan, Financial Stability Review—2nd Half 2012, 2012, http://www.sbp.org.pk/FSR/2012/pdf/2ndhalf/index.htm, [accessed 27 July 2017].

83 World Bank, World Development Indicators.

84 Ibid.

85 In the pre-reform system, state-owned specialized Development Finance Institutions were responsible for the majority of long-term development financing, but these have since been phased out (Zaidi, Issues in Pakistan's Economy, 2nd edn, p. 267).

86 State Bank of Pakistan, Online Economic Database, http://www.sbp.org.pk/ecodata/index2.asp, [accessed 27 July 2017].

87 A. Zaidi, Issues in Pakistan's Economy, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Karachi, 2005, p. 264.

88 The textile sector expanded capacity in preparation for the termination of quotas of textile imports by industrialized countries following the termination of the Multi Fiber agreement, in the expectation that exports would increase. However, following the termination of quotas, Pakistani exports actually decreased due to competition from China. Dawn, ‘Pakistan In Quota-Free Textile Trade’, Dawn, 2005, http://www.dawn.com/news/381526/pakistan-in-quota-free-textile-trade, [accessed 27 July 2017].

89 D. Hussain, ‘Banking sector performance’, Dawn, 2013, http://www.dawn.com/news/799275/banking-sector-performance, [accessed 27 July 2017].

90 Munir and Naqvi, ‘Pakistan's post-reforms banking sector’.

91 Here it is important to note that the major state-owned commercial banks were profitable from as far back as our data go (1973), up until the mid-1990s. This means that the banks were not the permanent drain on the government deficit that they were presented to be (ibid.).

92 State Bank of Pakistan, ‘Public finance’, Statistical Bulletin, March 2015, http://www.sbp.org.pk/reports/stat_reviews/Bulletin/2015/Mar/PublicFinance.pdf, [accessed 27 July 2017].

93 Cited in World Bank, ‘Pakistan's investment climate: laying the foundation for renewed growth, volume I: the main report’, World Bank Report No. 46435-PK, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2009, p. 19.

94 World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report 2014/15, World Economic Forum, Geneva, 2014.

95 World Bank, ‘Pakistan's investment climate’, p. 37.

96 Ibid.

97 Ibid.

98 Investment Climate Survey 2013, http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/data/exploreeconomies/2013/pakistan#finance, [accessed 27 July 2017].

99 Burki, A., Munir, K., Khan, M., Khan, U., Faheem, A., Khalid, A., and Hussain, T., Industrial Policy, Its Spatial Aspects, and Cluster Development in Pakistan, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore, 2011, p. 15 Google Scholar.

100 Ibid.

101 Ibid.

102 Ibid., pp. 15–16.

103 Ministry of Finance, Pakistan Economic Survey, various issues, 1973/74–2013/14, http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey_1314.html, [accessed 27 July 2017].

104 Dawn, ‘Retrenchment of bank workers condemned’, Dawn, 2006, http://www.dawn.com/news/194461/karachi-retrenchment-of-bank-workers-condemned, [accessed 27 July 2017].

105 Dawn, ‘KARACHI: KESC men refuse to call off strike: privatization’, Dawn, 2005, http://www.dawn.com/news/401396/karachi-kesc-men-refuse-to-call-off-strike-privatization, [accessed 27 July 2017].

106 Dawn, ‘Workers of WAPDA stage rally’, Dawn, 2005, http://www.dawn.com/news/381944/rawalpindi-workers-of-wapda-stage-rally-kesc-privatization. [accessed 27 July 2017].

107 Munir, K., Naqvi, N., and Usmani, A., ‘The abject condition of labor in Pakistan’, International Labor and Working-Class History, vol. 87, 2015, pp. 174–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

108 Hussain, ‘Policy considerations’.

109 International Monetary Fund, ‘Pakistan: poverty reduction strategy paper’, 2004, p. 5.

110 International Monetary Fund, ‘Pakistan: poverty reduction strategy paper’, 2010, pp. 280–1.

111 Dawn, ‘Banking sector gains strength says PM’, Dawn, 2006, http://www.dawn.com/news/198303/banking-sector-gains-strength-says-pm, [accessed 27 July 2017].

112 Imadudin, ‘Performance of banking sector remained impressive: SBP’, Business Recorder, 2014, http://www.brecorder.com/pakistan/banking-a-finance/206047-performance-of-banking-sector-remained-impressive-sbp.html, [accessed 27 July 2017].

113 International Monetary Fund, ‘Pakistan: poverty reduction strategy paper’, 2014, p. 261.

114 International Monetary Fund, ‘Pakistan’, IMF Country Report No. 14/357, 2014, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2014/cr14357.pdf, [accessed 27 July 2017].

115 International Monetary Fund, ‘Pakistan: poverty reduction strategy paper’, 2010, pp. 259, 264.

116 Ibid., p. 261.

117 Ibid., p. 276.

118 Due to power shortages, entire cities into darkness for over 12 hours a day and rural areas for 18–20 hours a day, with the electricity shortfall reaching 7,000 MW in peak periods (M. Vaid and M. Tourangbam, ‘Pakistan's energy crisis’, Foreign Policy, August 2014).

119 Dawn, ‘WAPDA workers protest privatisation’, Dawn, 2014, http://www.dawn.com/news/1082113, [accessed 27 July 2017].

120 International Monetary Fund, Pakistan: Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility Policy Framework Paper, 1998/99–2000/01, 1998.

121 Ibid.

122 International Monetary Fund, Pakistan: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, IMF Country Report No. 04/24, Washington, DC, 2004.

123 Ibid.

124 KESC was renamed ‘K-Electric’ after being bought by Dubai-based private equity firm Abraaj Capital (Dawn, ‘K-Electric's turnaround’, Dawn, 2016, https://www.dawn.com/news/1293915, [accessed 16 August 2017]).

125 Business Recorder, ‘In the whirlpool of power shortfall’, Business Recorder, 2014, http://fp.brecorder.com/res/44-miscellaneous/4392-in-the-whirlpool-of-power-shortfall/, [accessed 16 August 2017].

126 B. Fine and D. Hall, ‘Terrains of neoliberalism: constraints and opportunities for alternative models of service delivery’, in McDonald and Ruiters (eds), Alternatives to Privatization.

127 Macdonald and Ruiters, Alternatives to Privatisation, Routledge/Taylor & Francis, New York, 2012.