Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:15:30.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Mobilization in the Localities: The 1942 Quit India Movement in Midnapur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Bidyut Chakrabarty
Bidyut Chakrabarty
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Delhi University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Following the adoption of 8 August resolution at Gowalia tank in Bombay, Indian masses rose to revolt, which became famous as the Quit India movement. It was a call for freedom. ‘Nothing less than freedom’, to quote Gandhi. Unlike the 1920–21 Non-cooperation and 1930–32 Civil Disobedience movements which were basically peaceful campaigns against the British rule in India, the Quit India movement was the ultimatum to the British for final withdrawal, a Gandhi-led un-Gandhian way of struggle since the Mahatma exhorted the people to take up arms in self-defence, and resort to armed resistance against a stronger and well-equipped aggressor.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , October 1992 , pp. 791 - 814
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gandhi, , Collected Works, vol. 76, p. 384.Google Scholar

2 Harijan, 15.3.1942, and 29.3.1942.Google Scholar

3 Hutchins, F. G., Spontaneous Revolution: The Quit India Movement (Manohar Book Service, Delhi, 1971).Google Scholar

4 Omvedt, Gail, ‘The Satara Prati Sarkar’ in Pandey, G. (ed.), The Indian Nation in 1942 (K. P. Bagchi and Co., Calcutta, 1988), pp. 223–61.Google Scholar

5 Chaudhuri, N. C., Thy Hand Great Anarch: India: 1921–1952 (Chatto and Windus, London, 1988).Google Scholar

6 ibid., p. 704.

7 Ibid.

8 Mitra, Chandan, ‘Popular Uprising in 1942: The Case of Balia’, in Pandey, (ed.), The Indian Nation in 1942, pp. 165–84.Google Scholar

9 Pandey, (ed.), The Indian Nation in 1942.Google Scholar

10 The Times, 31 July 1941.Google Scholar

11 Kamtekar, Indivar, ‘The End of the Colonial State, 1940–47’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, 1988, p. 25.Google Scholar

12 ibid., p. 26.

13 Brown, Judith, Modern India (Oxford University Press (hereafter OUP), New Delhi, 1985), pp. 311–12.Google Scholar

14 India Office Records (hereafter IOR) R/3/2/25, Governor of Bengal to the Chief Secretary, Government of Bengal, 7.11.1940.

15 Indian Annual Register, July–December 1942 quoting Tottenham's Congress Responsibility for the Disturbances, February 1942.Google Scholar

16 Tottenham's, Congress Responsibility, quoted in Sarkar, Sumit, Modern India, 1985–1947 (Macmillan, Delhi, 1983), p. 390.Google Scholar

17 The Transfer of Power in India 1942–47, vol. II, ed. Mansergh, N. and Lumby, E. W. R. (HMSO, London, 1971), p. 953.Google Scholar

18 Telegram to Churchill, ibid., p. 853.

19 Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML hereafter), AICC papers, 231/42, Andhra Pradesh Congress committee Circular 29/7/1942.

20 See the Appendix.

21 National Archives of India (hereafter NAI) Delhi, Home-Poll, 3/52/1943(1), quoted in Sarkar, Modern India, p. 396;Google Scholar see also the Appendix.

22 NAI, Home-Poll, 3/52/1943(1), in ibid.

23 Ibid.

24 IOR, R/3/3/28 Bihar Chief Secretary's Telegram to the Secretary of State, London, 12/8/1942.

25 Toye, Hugh, Subhas Chandra Bose: The Springing Tiger (Cassell, London, 1959).Google Scholar

26 Brown, , Modern India, p. 316.Google Scholar

27 The Transfer of Power, 1942–47, vol. IV (HMSO, London, 1973), p. 334.Google Scholar

28 Nandy, Ashis, The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism (OUP, New Delhi, 1988), pp. XIV, 10–11.Google Scholar

29 Brown, , Modern India, p. 317.Google Scholar

30 West Bengal State Archives, Calcutta, Home-Poll, 71/42, District Officer's Chronicals; Sarkar, Modern India, p. 394.Google Scholar

31 The Transfer of Power, vol. II, pp. 669, 682–3.Google Scholar

32 There were four major marches at taluka centres in Satara (between 24 August and 10 September) at Karad (4000), Targaon (8000), Wadiy (700) and Islampur (6000). In Shirala taluka, 32 patils resigned from their posts. The Reserved forest in Shirala was declared open to the public.

33 Congress Youth Squads conducted these attacks. In Kundal, a bank was robbed and in Shirala, grain from government stores was distributed to the public (1941–42 had been a year of famine and in 1942 there was a price inflation).

34 See, for details, Omvedt, ‘The Satara Prati Sarkar’, in Pandey, The Indian Nation in 1942, and Rodrigues, Livi, ‘Rural Protest and Politics: A Study of Peasant Movement in Maharashtra’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London, 1984, pp. 400–19.Google Scholar

35 Sanyal, Hitesranjan, ‘Congress Movement in the Villages of Eastern Midnapore, 1921–31’, in Thorner, Alice et al. , Asia Du Sud, Traditions et Changements (Paris, 1979);Google ScholarSanyal, Hitersranjan, ‘Nationalist Movement in South West Bengal’, in Chaturanga (Bengali) Calcutta, Baisakh-Assar, 1384.Google Scholar

36 Sanyal, , ‘Congress Movement in the Villages’, p. 172.Google Scholar

37 Ibid.

38 Ibid.

39 Ibid.

40 ibid., p. 173.

41 ibid., p. 174.

42 Chatterjee, Partha, ‘Some Considerations on the Making of the 1928 Bengal Tenancy (Amendment) Act’, Occasional Paper, Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta, 1980, pp. 40–1.Google Scholar

43 Sanyal, , ‘Congress Movement in the Villages’, p. 177.Google Scholar

44 IORL/PJ/12/47 Fortnightly Report, Second half of March, 1933.

45 IOR, L/PJ/12/144, Chief Secretary, Government of Bengal, Report for the second half of April 1939.

46 Dasgupta, S., ‘Local Politics in Bengal: Midnapore, 1921–32’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London, 1980.Google Scholar

47 West Bengal State Archives, Calcutta, Home-Poll 71/42, p. 16.Google Scholar

48 Ibid.

49 Chakrabarty, B., ‘Virangahas and the Quit India Movement’, The Statesman, 22 January 1989.Google Scholar

50 West Bengal State Archives, Calcutta Home-Poll 71/42, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

51 Ibid.

52 IOR, R/3/2, District Magistrate, Midnapur to the Chief Secretary, Government of Bengal, 3/12/43.