Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:39:04.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Connected Material Histories: A response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2016

CRAIG CLUNAS
CRAIG CLUNAS*
Affiliation:
History of Art Department, University of Oxford, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In giving the very first lecture that first-year History of Art undergraduates at Oxford will hear, I usually employ the practice of giving them a sheet of paper with nothing on it but the outlines of the land masses of the globe, and ask them to draw a line round ‘the West’. The idea was inspired by a reading of Lewis and Wigen's 1997 book The Myth of Continents (‘justly celebrated’, as Sanjay Subrahmanyam says), and remains a useful pedagogic act, up to a point, for the reasons so clearly laid out in that book; also, it breaks the ice, it gets a buzz of conversation going in the room, it certainly foregrounds the topic, central now to art historical enquiry, of the way in which ‘representations are social facts’. But the reason I do not ask them to draw a map round ‘the East’ is that I suspect it would be too easy, or at least done too quickly, and indeed the boundaries of both ‘East’ and ‘Orient’, as ‘Europe's Other’, can be shown to have fluctuated much less than have the boundaries of what, for most Oxford students, is still, if somewhat tenuously, ‘us’ or ‘here’. Wherever ‘the East’ is, it all lies (as Subrahmanyam points out in his lecture) in that assuredly -etic part of the world called Asia. I might, in the privacy of my own hard drive, choose to categorize those European images which I need for teaching as ‘Non-Eastern’ (to balance the ‘Non-Western’ rubric on which my specialist options appear in the syllabus). But that is not a category widely used, or at least not in my own discipline of art history.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 61 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lewis, Martin W. and Wigen, Kären E., The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar, especially pp. 49–53.

2 Rabinow, Paul, ‘Representations are Social Facts: Modernity and Post-Modernity in Anthropology’, in Clifford, James and Marcus, George E. (eds), Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1986), pp. 234–61Google Scholar.

3 Clunas, Craig and Harrison-Hall, Jessica (eds), Ming: 50 Years that Changed China (London: British Museum Press, 2015)Google Scholar.

4 For one view, see Zhao, Gang, ‘Reinventing China: Imperial Qing Ideology and the Rise of Modern Chinese National Identity in the Early Twentieth Century’, Modern China, 32.1 (2006), pp. 3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A sense of the intensity of the debate can be gained from the blog post ‘Putting Things in Context; a contribution to the NQH debate by Professor Mark C. Elliott’, posted on 21 May 2015 on the blog ‘History, Ethics and Faith in China’; http://history-in-china.net/2015/05/21/putting-things-in-context-a-contribution-to-the-nqh-debate-by-professor-mark-c-elliott/, [accessed 29 September 2015].

5 The quote is from Fairbank, John K., Reischauer, Edwin O. and Craig, Albert M, East Asia: Tradition and Transformation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973), p. 178Google Scholar. For an expression of more recent understanding, see Robinson, David M., ‘The Ming Court and the Legacy of the Yuan Mongols’, in Robinson, David M. (ed.), Culture, Courtiers, and Competition: The Ming Court (1368–1644) (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2008), pp. 365–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 O’Rourke, Kevin H. and Williamson, Jeffrey G., ‘Did Vasco da Gama Matter for European Markets?’, Economic History Review, 62.3 (2009), pp. 655–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 633); Ju-kang, T’ien, ‘Chêng Ho's Voyages and the Distribution of Pepper in China’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 2 (1981), pp. 186–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Leibsohn, Dana, ‘Made in Mexico, Made in China’, in Pierce, Donna and Otsuka, Ronald (eds), At the Crossroads: The Arts of Spanish America and Early Global Trade, 1492–1850. Papers from the 2010 Mayer Symposium (Denver: Denver Art Museum, 2012), pp. 11–40Google Scholar.

8 Sanabrais, Sofía, ‘From Byōbu to Biombo: The Transformation of the Japanese Folding Screen in Colonial Mexico’, Art History, 38.4 (2015), pp. 778–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Crewe, Ryan Dominic, ‘Pacific Purgatory: Spanish Dominicans, Chinese Sangleys and the Entanglement of Mission and Commerce in Manila, 1580–1620’, Journal of Early Modern History, 19.4 (2015), pp. 337–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For an enigmatic reference to a painter who deserves to have a reputation in Yamolijia (America), see Clunas, Craig, Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China (London: Reaktion Books, 1997), pp. 177–78Google Scholar.

10 Clunas, Craig, Empire of Great Brightness: Visual and Material Cultures of Ming China (London: Reaktion Books, 2007), p. 90Google Scholar.

11 Clunas, Craig, ‘The Art Market in 17th Century China: The Evidence of the Li Rihua Diary’, Meishushi yu guannianshi, 1 (2003), pp. 201–23Google Scholar (pp. 216–17).

12 Andrade, Tonio, ‘Cannibals with Cannons: The Sino-Portuguese Clashes of 1521–22 and the Early Chinese Adoption of Western Guns’, Journal of Early Modern History, 19.4 (2015), pp. 311–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 This is the surmise in Thackston, W. M., Album Prefaces and Other Documents on the History of Calligraphers and Painter, Studies and Sources in Islamic Art and Architecture (Leiden: Brill, 2001)Google Scholar, p. 53. See too Kauz, Ralph, ‘Gift Exchange Between Iran, Central Asia, and China Under the Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644’, in Komaroff, Linda and Blair, Sheila (eds), Gifts of the Sultan: The Arts of Giving at the Islamic Courts (Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 2011), pp. 115–21Google Scholar.

14 Roxburgh, David J., The Persian Album 1400–1600: From Dispersal to Collection (New Haven, Connecticut, and London: Yale University Press, 2005), pp. 295–304Google Scholar.

15 Clunas, Craig, Chinese Painting and its Audiences (Princeton and London: Princeton University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar.

16 Wende, Zhang, Ming yu Tiemuer wangchao guanxishi yanjiu (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2006), pp. 266–74Google Scholar.

17 One engaging fictional example of ‘alternative history’ is Robinson, Kim Stanley, The Years of Rice and Salt (New York: Bantam Books, 2002)Google Scholar.

18 Gregory, Scott W., ‘Daydreaming Dynasty: The Eunuch Sanbao's Journeys in the Western Seas and “Present-Day” Fiction of the Ming’, Ming Studies, 70 (2014), pp. 10–28Google Scholar.

19 Mosca, Matthew W., From Frontier Policy to Foreign Policy: The Question of India and the Transformation of Geopolitics in Qing China (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013), p. 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Brook, Timothy, ‘How to Sail from Calicut to Hormuz: Traces of the Zheng He Voyages in Late-Ming Navigational Materials’, in Clunas, Craig, Harrison-Hall, Jessica and Luk, Yu-ping (eds), Ming China: Courts and Contacts 1400–1450 (London: British Museum Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar. On the Selden map, see http://seldenmap.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/, [accessed 29 September 2015], and Brook, Timothy, Mr Selden's Map of China: Decoding the Secrets of a Vanished Cartographer (New York, London, New Delhi, Sydney: Bloomsbury Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

21 Huan, Ma, Ying-yai Sheng-lan: The Overall Survey of the Ocean's Shores [1433], translated and edited by Mills, J. V. G. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), p. 146Google Scholar, cited in Craig Clunas, ‘Precious Stones and Ming Culture, 1400–1450’, in Clunas et al. (eds), Ming China.

22 For a full translation and discussion, see Brook, ‘How to Sail from Calicut to Hormuz’.

23 The idea of ‘Sinosphere’ depends on Vogel, Joshua, Articulating the Sinosphere: Sino-Japanese Relations in Space and Time (Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: Harvard University Press, 2009)Google Scholar.

24 Yu-chih, Lai, ‘Images, Knowledge and Empire: Depicting Cassowaries in the Qing Court’, Transcultural Studies, 1 (2013), pp. 7–100Google Scholar (p. 24).

25 Lai, ‘Images, Knowledge and Empire’, p. 83.

26 See, most recently, Berger, Patricia, Empire of Emptiness: Buddhist Art and Political Authority in Qing China (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Kleutghen, Kristina Renée, Imperial Illusions: Crossing Pictorial Boundaries in the Qing Palaces (Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2015)Google Scholar; Clunas, Craig, Chinese Painting and its Audiences (Princeton and London: Princeton University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar; Gombrich, Ernst, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, sixth edition (London: Phaidon, 2002)Google Scholar.

27 Rawson, Jessica (ed.), China: The Three Emperors 1662–1795 (London: The Royal Academy, 2005)Google Scholar, p. 167.

28 An Siyuan zang shanben beitie xuan (Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 1996), p. 40.

29 Porter, David, The Chinese Taste in Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

30 Pagani, Catherine, Eastern Magnificence and European Ingenuity: Clocks of Late Imperial China (Anne Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Mosca, From Frontier Policy to Foreign Policy, p. 92; National Palace Museum, Catalogue of a Special Exhibition of Hindustan Jade in the National Palace Museum (Taipei: National Palace Museum, 1983)Google Scholar.

32 Shu-p’ing, Teng, ‘On the Eastward Transmission of Islamic-Style Jades During the Ch’ien-lung and Chia-ch’ing Reigns’, National Palace Museum Bulletin, 37.2 (2004), pp. 25–138Google Scholar.

33 The explicitly identified methodological roots of much of this work lie in the classic 1986 volume, Appadurai, Arjun (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, with its important formulation that, ‘even though from a theoretical point of view human actors encode things with significance, from a methodological point of view it is the things-in-motion that illuminate their human and social context’ (p. 5).

34 Meier, Sandy Prita, ‘Chinese Porcelain and Muslim Port Cities: Mercantile Materiality in Coastal East Africa’, Art History, 38.4 (2015), pp. 702–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar (pp. 706–07), citing Finlay, Robert, The Pilgrim Art: Cultures of Porcelain in World History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

35 Meier, Chinese Porcelain and Muslim Port Cities’, p. 715.

36 Elverskog, Johan, Buddhism and Islam on the Silk Road (Philadelphia and Oxford: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.