Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:30:32.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The China-Russia-Japan Military Balance in Manchuria, 1906–1918*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

ASADA MASAFUMI
ASADA MASAFUMI*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even after the Russo-Japanese War, Manchuria remained the powder keg of East Asia. In the war's aftermath, three empires, the Qing, the Russian and the Japanese, stationed their troops in Manchuria, in a struggle for military supremacy there. There has already been a considerable amount of research on these military activities. However, previous works have not discussed them from a triangular relationship. This paper contends that the history of modern East Asia cannot be understood until one examines the shift in the military balance in Manchuria from a triangular comparative point of view. The results of such examination show that, in Manchuria, each empire was unable to establish military domination alone, and therefore needed an alliance partner. During the Xinhai Revolution, the Russia-Japan ‘alliance’ wielded overwhelming military power against China. However, after the Russian Revolution in 1917, Japan renounced cooperation with a weakened Russia and built a new partnership with China to advance the Siberian intervention. The military triangle of Russia, China and Japan was unable to create a comprehensive regional security system in Manchuria because what was established was based on mutual distrust and fear.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 44 , Issue 6 , November 2010 , pp. 1283 - 1311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tamanoi, Mariko A., ‘Introduction’ in Tamanoi, Mariko A. (ed.), Crossed Histories: Manchuria in the Age of Empire (Honolulu: Association for Asian Studies and University of Hawaii Press: 2005), p. 1Google Scholar.

2 See, in particular, Romanov, B.A., Rossiia v Man'chzhurii (1892–1906): Ocherki po istorii vneshnei politiki samoderzhaviia v epokhu imperializma (Leningrad: Leningradskii Vostochnyi Institut Imeni A.S. Enukidze, 1928)Google Scholar; Avarin, V.I., Imperializm v Man'chzhurii (Moscow and Leningrad: Gos. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izd-vo, 1934), 2 volsGoogle Scholar; Tang, Peter S.H., Russian and Soviet Policy in Manchuria and Outer Mongolia, 1911–1931 (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1959)Google Scholar.

3 See, for example, Shinichi, Kitaoka, Nihon rikugun to tairiku seisaku: 1906–1918 [The Japanese Army and Continental Policy, 1906–1918] (Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, 1978)Google Scholar; Beasley, William G., Japanese Imperialism, 1894–1945 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Michihiko, Kobayashi, Nihon no tairiku seisaku 1895–1914: Katsura Tarô to Gotô Shinpei [Japanese Continental Policy, 1895–1914: Katsura Tarô and Gotô Shinpei] (Tokyo: Nansôsha, 1996)Google Scholar.

4 Paine, S.C.M., Imperial Rivals: China, Russia, and Their Disputed Frontier (Armonk, New York: M.E., Sharpe, 1996)Google Scholar.

5 Molodiakov, V.E., Rossiia i Iaponiia: Rel'cy gudiat zheleznodorozhnyi uzel rossiisko-iaponskikh otnoshen: 1891–1945 (Moscow: AST. Astrel. Khranitel, 2006)Google Scholar.

6 Popov, A., ‘Pervye shagi Russkogo imperializma na Dal'nem Vostoke (1888–1903 gg.)’, Krasnyi arkhiv, No. 52 (1932), p. 90Google Scholar.

7 Wolff, David, To the Harbin Station: The Liberal Alternative in Russian Manchuria, 1898–1914 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999), p. 65Google Scholar.

8 Golitsyn, V.V., Ocherk uchastiia okhrannoi strazhi Kitaiskoi Vostochnoi zheleznoi dorogi v sobytiiakh 1900 goda v Man'chzhurii (Harbin: Shtab Zaamurskago Okruga Pogranichnoi Strazhi, 1910), p. 112Google Scholar.

9 Glinski, B.B. (ed.), Prolog Russko-Iaponskoi voiny: Materialy iz arkhiva Grafa S. Iu. Vitte. (Petrograd: Brokgauz-Efron, 1916), pp. 36–37Google Scholar.

10 See, in particular, Lensen, George A., The Russo-Chinese War (Florida: Diplomatic Press, 1967)Google Scholar; V.G. Datsyshen, Russko-Kitaiskaia voina: Man'chzhuriia 1900 g. (Saint Petersburg: Al'manakh Tsitadel, 2000).

11 Russia. Voenno-istoricheskaia komissiia po opisaniiu Russko-Iaponskoi voiny. Russko-Iaponskaia voina 1904–1905 gg, Vol. 1 (Saint Petersburg: A.S. Suvorin, 1910), p. 375.

12 Orlov, N.V., ‘Zaamurtsy, 1898–1917 gg.’, Rossiiane v azii, Vol. 7 (2000), p. 274Google Scholar.

13 Minakov, V.P., ‘N.M. Chichagov: Nachal'nik Zaamurskogo okruga OKPS v 1903–1910 godakh’, Voprosy istorii, No. 5 (2004), p. 143Google Scholar.

14 Russia. Voenno-istoricheskaia komissiia po opisaniiu Russko-Iaponskoi voiny. Russko-Iaponskaia voina 1904–1905 gg. T. 7. Ch. 2, pp. 147–149.

15 Gaimushô [Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan] (ed.), Nihon gaikô bunsho [Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy], 1905, Meijiki, Vol. 55. V. (Tokyo: Nihon Kokusai Kyôkai, 1960), p. 492.

16 Ibid., p. 522.

17 P.S. Tishenko, Kitaiskaia vostochnaia zheleznaia doroga, 1 iiulia 1903–1 iiulia 1913 gg. (Harbin: Tipografiia K. V. Zh. D., 1914), p. 165. Oleg Vishniakov, in his article, gave the length of the railway as 2,116 kilometres, insisting that Russia had been able to station 31,700 soldiers. However, he did not explain where the difference between the CER official figure and his claim arises. V.V. Oleg, ‘Pogranichnok v vooruzhnnykh konfliktakh na Dal'nem Voctoke konets XIX-nachalo XX v.’, Rossia i ATR, No. 4 (2006), p. 68.

18 Nilus, E.Kh. (ed.), Istoricheskii obzor Kitaiskoi Vostochnoi zheleznoi dorogi, 1896–1923 gg. (Harbin: Tipografiia K.V. Zh. D., 1923), Vol.1, p. 513Google Scholar.

19 Plekhanov, A.A. and Plekhanov, A.M., Otdel'nyi korpus pogranichnoi strazhi imperatorskii Rossii: 1893–1917 (Moscow: Granitsa, 2003), p. 32Google Scholar.

20 E. Belov, ‘O vvode russkikh voennykh otriadov v Kitai v 1911–1913 gg.’, Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka No. 1 (1998), p. 118.

21 Osobyi zhurnal Soveta ministrov, 27 April 1909, No. 5, p. 5.

22 Jun, Tsunoda, Manshû mondai to kokubô hôshin [Manchurian Problem and National Defence Principle] (Tokyo: Hara Shobô, 1967), p. 297Google Scholar.

23 Kobayashi, Nihon no tairiku seisaku, p. 130.

24 Nihon gaikô bunsho, 1905, Meijiki, Vol. 38. I, pp. 279–290.

25 Yasutoshi, Teramoto, Nichiro sensô igo no Nihon Gaikô: Power politics no naka no Man-Kan Mondai [Japanese Foreign Policy after the Russo-Japanese War: Manchurian and Korean Problem in Power Politics] (Tokyo: Sinzansha Shuppan, 1999), p. 165Google Scholar.

26 Japan. Minami manshû tetsudô kabushiki gaisha [South Manchuria Railway Co.], Minami manshû tetsudô kabushiki gaisha 20 nen ryakushi [Twenty Years’ Abbreviated History of the South Manchuria Railway Co.]. (Dalian: South Manchuria Railway Co., 1927), p. 62.

27 Coox, Alvin D., ‘The Kwantung Army Dimension’ in Duus, Peter et al. (eds.), The Japanese Informal Empire in China, 1895–1937 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989), p. 397Google Scholar.

28 Ajia rekishi shiryô center [Japan Center for Asian Historical Records, hereinafter JACAR], ref. C03022855000 (Gunmukyoku dokuritsu shubi daitai hensei yôryou seitei no ken [Constitution of the Proceedings for Formation of the Independent Garrison Battalion, from the Military Affairs Bureau]), pp. 23–24. JACAR is a national digital database testifying to Japan's historical relations in Asia as well as elsewhere. This site provides access to official documents—dating from the Meiji era through 1945—of the Japanese national archives. The URL of this homepage is http://www.jacar.go.jp/english/index.html [accessed 12 March 2010].

29 Takashi, Nakayama, Kantôgun [The Kantô Army] (Tokyo: Kôdansha, 2000), p. 19Google Scholar.

30 For example, Tanaka Giichi, who acted as Army Minister, estimated the total at 10,800 in 1914. Tanaka Giichi denki kankôkai, Tanaka Giichi denki [Biography of Tanaka Giichi] (Tokyo: Hara Shobô, 1981), p. 577. In contrast, two battalions were removed between 1925 and 1929. Japan. Bôei kenkyûsho sensi shitu [War History Office of the National Institute for Defence Studies], Sensi sôsho: Kantôgun [Military History Series: The Kantô Army] (Tokyo: Asagumo Shinbunsha, 1974), Vol. 1, p. 14.

31 Suleski, Ronald, Civil Government in Warlord China: Tradition, Modernization, and Manchuria (New York: Peter Lang, 2002), p. 30Google Scholar.

32 Lee, Robert H.G., The Manchurian Frontier in Ch'ing History (Cambridge M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1970), p. 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Kang Peizhu, ‘Ri-E zhanzheng hou de qingting dongbei fangwu [The Northeast Defence of the Qing Dynasty after the Russo-Japanese War]’, Jindaishi yanjiu, No. 3 (1989), p. 85.

34 Shigeo, Nishimura, Chûgoku kindai tôhoku chiikishi kenkyû [A History of Modern Northeast China] (Kyoto: Hôritu Bunkasha, 1984), p. 60Google Scholar.

35 Sokolov, A.R. (translated by Tomoe, ItÔ), ‘20 seiki shotô no Manshû gyôsei kaikaku [Administrative Reform of Manchuria Early in the 20th Century]’, Kan nihonkai kenkyû, Vol. 12 (2005), p. 50Google Scholar.

36 Yuri, Shibutani, ‘Chô Sakurin seiken seiritu no haikei [The Background of the Zhang Zuolin Regime; Military and Police Systems Related to Xinhai Revolution in Fengtian in the Late Qing Dynasty]’, Ajia keizai, Vol. 37, No. 5 (1997), p. 8Google Scholar.

37 Lee, The Manchurian Frontier in Ch'ing History, pp. 170–171.

38 Mackinnon, Stephen R., Power and Politics in Late Imperial China: Yuan Shi-kai in Beijing and Tianjin, 1901–1908 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), p. 90Google Scholar.

39 Shichang, Xu, Dongsansheng zhenglue [Administration of the Three Eastern Provinces] (Changchun: Jilin Wenshi Chubanshe, 1989), pp. 640–649Google Scholar. Reprint.

40 Kang, ‘Ri-E zhanzheng hou de qingting dongbei fangwu’, p. 86.

41 Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi voenno-istoricheskii arkhiv (Russian State Archive for Military History, Moscow, hereinafter RGVIA), f. 1558, op. 3, d. 14, ll. 37–38.

42 Takeharu, Shimanuki, ‘Kokubou hôshin, shoyô heiryoku, youhei kouryô no hensen [Transition of the National Defence Principle, Required Force Strength, and Military Programme]’, Gunji shigaku, Vol. 8, No. 4 (1973), p. 4Google Scholar.

43 Sunhan, Li, Kindai higasi ajia no seiji rikigaku: Kantô o meguru Nit-Chû-Chô kankei no siteki tenkai [Political Power in Modern East Asia: Historical Developments Surrounding Jiandao during the Relationship between Japan, China and Korea] (Tokyo: Kinseisha, 1991), pp. 78–79Google Scholar.

44 Russia. Shtab voisk Dal'nego Vostoka, Pervye bolshie manevry Kitaiskoi armii: V oktiabrie 1905 g. (Harbin: Parovaia Tipografiia Gazety ‘Novyi Krai’, 1906), p. 14.

45 Ibid., p. VI.

46 Denikin, A.I., Russko-Kitaiskii voproc: Voenno-politicheskii ocherk (Warsaw: Tipografiia Varshavskago Uchebnago Okruga, 1908), p. 40Google Scholar.

47 Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi federatsii [State Archive of the Russian Federation, Moscow, hereinafter GARF), f. P-6081, op. 1, d. 152 (Delo po reorganizatsii Okhrany dorogi), ll. 123–123ob.

48 Hara Teruyuki, ‘Nichi-Ro Sensô-go no Roshia kyokutô chiiki seisaku to kokusai kankyô [The Russian Far East after the Russo-Japanese War: Regional Policy and International Environment]’, Roshia shi kenkyû, No, 72 (2003), p. 12.

49 Ignatev, A.V., Vneshniaia politika Rossii, 1905–1907 gg. (Moscow: Nauka, 1986), p. 178Google Scholar.

50 Fuller, William C. Jr., Strategy and Power in Russia, 1600–1914 (New York: The Free Press, 1992), pp. 423–425Google Scholar.

51 JACAR, ref. C03022871000, (Shinkoku chûtongun tôsanshô keiei ni kanshi Jo Sei shôgi no hôkoku no ken [Report on Discussion of Governing Three Eastern Provinces by Xu and Yuan, from the Expeditionary Force in Qing]), p. 3.

52 Marshall, Alex, The Russian General Staff and Asia, 1800–1917 (London: Routledge Curzon, 2006), p. 106Google Scholar.

53 Dallin, David J., The Rise of Russia in Asia (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1949), pp. 107–108Google Scholar.

54 RGVIA, f. 1558, op. 3, d. 15 (Svedeniia Glavnogo upravleniia general'nogo shtava o Kitae, Iaponii, Turtsii, Afganistane, Indii, i Persi), ll. 42ob–43.

55 RGVIA, f. 1558, op. 7, d. 53 (Pis'ma ministra finansov Kokovtseva voennomy ministry Sukhomlinovu o nuzhdakh Zaamurskogo voennogo okruga), ll. 3ob–4.

56 SSSR. Kommissiia po izdaniiu dokumentov epokhi imperializma (ed.), Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia v epokhu imperializma: Dokumenty iz arkhivov tsarskogo i vremmenogo pravitelstv, 1878–1917 gg. (Moscow and Leningrad: Gos. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe Izd-vo, 1938), S. 2, T. 18, Ch. 1, No. 16, p. 12.

57 JACAR, ref. B07090237400 (Kita-Manshû Ro-koku tetsudô shubihei kankei zassan [Miscellaneous Matters Concerning the Russian Railway Guard in North Manchuria]), pp. 48–49.

58 Shimanuki, ‘Kokubou houshin’, pp. 12–13.

59 Michio, Yoshimura, Nihon to Roshia: Nichi-Ro sengo kara kakumei made [Japan and Russia: From the Russo-Japanese War until the Russian Revolution] (Tokyo: Hara Shobô, 1968), p. 17Google Scholar.

60 Zhongfu, Zhao, ‘Xinhai geming qianhou de dongsansheng [The Three Eastern Provinces before and after the Xinhai Revolution]’, Zhongyan yanjiuyuan jindaishi yanjiusuo jikan, Vol. 11 (1982), pp. 121–122Google Scholar.

61 Yuwen, Wu, ‘Fengtian Xinhai geming shu lun [The Xinhai Revolution in Fengtian]’ in Zhongguo renmin zhengzhi xieshang huiyi quanguo weiyuanhui wenshi ziliao weiyuanhui [Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference National Committee, Historical Materials Research Committee] (ed.), Xinhai geming zai gedi: Jinian xinhai geming bashizhounian [The Xinhai Revolution around the Country: 80th Anniversary of the Xinhai Revolution] (Beijing: Zhongguo Wenshi Chubanshe, 1991), p. 329Google Scholar.

62 Nishimura, Chûgoku kindai tôhoku chiikishi kenkyû, p. 118.

63 Xintun, Yu, Sonbun no kakumei undô to Nihon [Revolutionary Movement of Sun Yatsen and Japan] (Tokyo: Rokkô Shuppansha, 1989), p. 169Google Scholar.

64 Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia v epokhu imperializma, S. 2, T. 19, Ch. 2, No. 505, p. 164.

65 Nishimura, Chûgoku kindai tôhoku chiikishi kenkyû, p. 114.

66 Belov, ‘O vvode russkikh voennykh otriadov’, p. 118.

67 Marshall, The Russian General Staff and Asia, p. 104.

68 Kokin, M., ‘Dal'nevostochnaia politika tsarizma nakanune i v period revoliutsii 1911 goda v Kitae’, Istoricheskii sbornik, Vol. 3 (1934), p. 248Google Scholar.

69 Akira, Baba, Nichi-Ro sensô go no Nit-Chû kankei: Kyôzon kyôei shugi no hatan [Japan-China Relations after the Russo-Japanese War: Collapse of the Co-existence and Co-prosperity Doctrine] (Tokyo: Hara Shobô, 1993), p. 155Google Scholar.

70 Tsunoda, Manshû mondai to kokubô hôshin, p. 753.

71 Ibid., p. 754.

72 Beasley, Japanese Imperialism, p. 105. See Yamagata's memorandum of 14 January 1912.

73 Takashi, Itô et al. . (eds.), Yamagata Aritomo kankei monjo [Documents Related to Yamagata Aritomo], Vol. 2 (Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppan, 2006), pp. 312–313Google Scholar. From October, Tanaka was keeping in touch with the Russian military attaché in Japan and expressing joint action with Russia, if the situation in China deteriorated. Russia. Voennyi Agent (Japan) Records. Box. 2–2, p. 41. The original is in the Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University, California, America.

74 Ryôju, Sakurai, ‘Singai kakumeiji ni okeru Nihon rikugun no hokushin, manshû shuppei keikaku [The Japanese Army's Plan for Dispatching Troops to North China and Manchuria at the Time of the Xinhai Revolution]’ in Fumitaka, Kurosawa, RyÔju, Sekurai and Seiji, Saitô (eds), Kokusai kankyô no naka no kindai Nihon [Modern Japan in International Setting] (Tokyo: Fuyô Shobô Shuppan, 2001), pp. 181–183Google Scholar; Katsumi, Usui, Nihon to Chûgoku: Taishô jidai [Japan and China: The Taishô Period] (Tokyo: Hara Shobô, 1972), p. 20Google Scholar.

75 Yamagata Aritomo kankei monjo, Vol. 1, p. 89.

76 Tsunoda, Manshû mondai to kokubou houshin, p. 763.

77 Beliaev, S.G., ‘K istorii ekspansii Rossii vo Vneshnei Mongolii nachala XX v.’, Nestor: Ezhekvartal'nyi zhurnal istorii i kul'tury Rossii i Vostochnoi Evropy, Vol. 2 (2000), p. 349Google Scholar.

78 Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia v epokhu imperializma, S. 2, T. 19, Ch. 2, No. 491, p. 149 n. 1.

79 Ibid., p. 149.

80 Ibid., p. 164.

81 dananguan, Heilongjiangsheng [Archive of Heilongjiang Province] (ed.), Zhongdong tielu [The Chinese Eastern Railway] (Harbin: Yejing Heilongjiangsheng Danan Chuban Zongshe, 1986), Vol. 1, pp. 481–482Google Scholar.

82 Quested, Rosemary K.I., ‘Matey’ Imperialists?: The Tsarist Russians in Manchuria, 1895–1917 (Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, 1982), p. 233Google Scholar.

83 The best secondary treatment of the relationship between Russia and the independence movement of Hulunbuir is: Tang, Russian and Soviet Policy, p. 81–91.

84 Lee, The Manchurian Frontier in Ch'ing History, p. 122.

85 Zhongfu, Zhao, Qingji Zhong-E dongsansheng jiewu jiaoshe [Sino-Russian Negotiations over the Manchurian Border Issue during the End of the Qing Period] (Taipei: Zhongyan Yanjiuyuan Jindaishi Yanjiusuo, 1998), p. 166–185. Second EditionGoogle Scholar.

86 Beliaev, ‘K istorii ekspansii Rossii vo Vneshnei Mongolii nachala XX v.’, p. 353.

87 Ibid., p. 353.

88 JACAR, ref. B03050662100 (Meiji 44 nen 1 gatu 22 niti kara Meiji 45 nenn 2 gatu 13 niti [22 January 1911 to 13 February 1912]), p. 3.

89 Xiantian, Xue, Zhongdong tielu hulujun yu dongbei bianjiang zhengju [Chinese Eastern Railway Guard and the General Political Situation on the Northeastern Borders] (Beijing: Shehui Kexue Wenxian Chubanshe, 1993), pp. 158–160Google Scholar.

90 GARF, f. P-6534, op. 1, d. 15 (Materialy po revoliutsii v Kitae v 1911–12 gg.), l. 52.

91 Quested, ‘Matey’ Imperialists? p. 237.

92 Tsunoda, Manshû mondai to kokubô hôshin, p. 767–769.

93 Masaru, Hatano, Manmô dokuritu undô [Manchu-Mongol Independence Movement] (Tokyo: PHP Kenkyûsho, 2001), p. 93Google Scholar; Xianshi, Yi, Nihon no tairiku seisaku to Chûgoku tôhoku [Japanese Continental Policy and Northeast China] (Tokyo: Rokkô Shuppansha, 1989), pp. 141–146Google Scholar. For the path to Kawashima's revolution, see Reynolds, Douglas R., China, 1898–1912: The Xinzheng Revolution and Japan (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), pp. 164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Berton, Peter, ‘A New Russo-Japanese Alliance? Diplomacy in the Far East during World War I’, Acta Slavica Iaponica, Vol. 11 (1993), p. 61Google Scholar.

95 Kitaoka, Nihon rikugun to tairiku seisaku, p. 174.

96 iinkai, Kindai Nit-Chû kankeisi nenpyô henshû (ed.), Kindai Nit-Chû kankeisi nenpyô [Chronology of Modern Japan-China History] (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2006), p. 312Google Scholar.

97 ‘Documents’ in Ken, Kurihara (ed.), Tai-Man-Mô seisakushi no ichimen [One Side of the Policy for Manchuria and Mongolia] (Tokyo: Hara Shobô, 1966), p. 346Google Scholar. However, the Japanese Foreign Ministry was not particularly sympathetic to Nakamura's proposal, and this plan was not carried out. Coox, ‘The Kwantung Army Dimension’, p. 401.

98 Nakami Tatsuo, ‘Babujab and His Uprising: Re-examining the Inner Mongol Struggle for Independence’, Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko, No. 57 (1999), pp. 146–147; Kurihara Ken, ‘Daiichiji, dainiji Man-Mô dokuritu undô to Koike gaimushô seimu kyokuchô no jishoku [On the First and Second Manchu-Mongol Independence Movement and Koike's Resignation from Directorship of Political Bureau of Ministry of Foreign Affairs]’ in Kurihara (ed.), Tai-Man-Mô seisakushi no ichimen, pp. 148–149.

99 Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia v epokhu imperializma, S. 3, T. 7, Ch. 1, No. 88, p. 118.

100 D.L. Khorvat, ‘Memoirs’, chap. 9, p. 9. The original is in the Hoover Institution Archives, Stanford University.

101 Ikonnikova, T.Ia., ‘Problema okhrany KVZhD v sviazi mobilizatsiei na front chastei Zaamurskii Pogranichnoi Strazh’ in Dubinina, N.I., (ed.), Dalnii Vostok Rossii - Severo-Vostok Kitaia: Istoricheskii opyt vzaimodeistviia i perspektivy sotrudnichestva (Khabarovsk: Izdatelskii Dom Chastnaia Kollektsiia, 1998), pp. 59–60Google Scholar.

102 Osobyi zhurnal Soveta ministrov, 13 April 1915, No. 4, p. 1.

103 Teruyuki, Hara, Shiberia shuppei: Kakumei to kanshô, 1917–1922 [The Siberian Intervention: Revolution and Intervention, 1917–1922] (Tokyo: Chikuma Shobô, 1989), p. 254Google Scholar.

104 Ikonnikova, ‘Problema okhrany KVZhD’, p. 60.

105 Molodiakov, Rossiia i Iaponiia, p. 256.

106 The detail was 38,300 in Fengtian Province, 15,000 in Jilin Province, 14,600 in Heilongjiang Province. Liu Fenghan, ‘“Erci geming” hou Yuan Shikai junzheng gaizhi yu bingli bishu [Yuan Shikai's Reform of the Military Institution and Troop Deployment after the ‘Second Revolution’]’ in Xinhai geming shi congkan bianjizu, Xinhai geming shi congkan [Collections on the History of the Xinhai Revolution], Vol. 11 (Wuhan: Hubei Renmin Chubanshe, 2002), pp. 181–183.

107 Yuri, Shibuya, Bazoku de miru Manshû: Chô Sakurin no ayunda michi [Looking at Manchurian Bandits: The Road Taken by Zhang Zuolin] (Tokyo: Kôdansha, 2004), pp. 117–118Google Scholar.

108 Mitsuhiro, Matsushige, ‘Chô Sakurin ni yoru zaiti kenan kaiketusaku to Kiturinsyô Tokugun Mou Onen no kutiku [Zhang Zuolin's Measures for Resolving Local Problems and the Expulsion of Meng Enyuan, Army Commander of Jilin Province]’ in Suguru, Yokoyama and Saburô, Soda (eds), Chûgoku no kindaika to seijiteki tôgô [Modernization of China and PoliticalIntegration] (Hiroshima: Keisuisha, 1992), p. 221Google Scholar.

109 Masakazu, Hayashi, ‘Chô Sakurin gunbatu no keiseikatei to Nihon no taiô [Formation Process of the Zhang Zuolin Regime and the Japanese Responses]’, Kikan kokusai seiji, Vol. 41 (1970), p. 124Google Scholar.

110 Andreev, G.I., Revoliutsionnoe dvizhenie na KVZhD v 1917–1922 gg. (Novosibirsk: Izd-vo ‘Nauka’, Sibirskoe Otd-nie, 1983), pp. 46–47Google Scholar.

111 Hiroharu, Seki, Gendai higasi ajia kokusai kankyô no tanjô [The Birth of the Modern East Asian International Setting] (Tokyo: Fukumura Shuppan, 1966), p. 112Google Scholar.

112 Xue, Zhongdong tielu hulujun, pp. 190–192.

113 GARF, f. P-6081, op. 1, d. 102 (Sbornik uzakonehii i rasporiazhenii po upravleniiu territoriei KVZhd), ll. 449ob–450.

114 Carter, James H., Creating a Chinese Harbin: Nationalism in an International City (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002), p. 30Google Scholar.

115 Seki, Gendai higasi ajia kokusai kankyô no tanjô, pp. 159–161.

116 Sowtheng, Leong, Sino-Soviet Diplomatic Relations, 1917–1926 (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1976), p. 27Google Scholar.

117 Nihon gaikô bunsho. 1917, Taishôki, Vol. 13, pp. 650–651.

118 Hara, Shiberia shuppei, p. 126.

119 Kitaoka, Nihon rikugun to tairiku seisaku, p. 215.

120 Ibid., p. 219.

121 Toshihiko, Shimada, Kantôgun: Zaiman rikugun no dokusô [The Kantô Army: Runaway of the Army in Manchuria] (Tokyo: Kôdansha, 2005), p. 55Google Scholar. Reprint.

122 Tokushi, Kasahara, ‘Pekin seifu to Shiberia shuppei: Daiichiji taisen to Roshia kakumei ga motarashita higasi ajia sekai no hendou [The Beijing Government and the Siberian Intervention: Upheaval of East Asia Caused by World War I and the Russian Revolution]’ in Chuô daigaku jinbun kagaku kenkyûjo [Humanities Research Institute of Chuô Daigaku] (ed.), Minkoku-ki Chûgoku to higasi ajia no hendou [China Republican Period and Upheaval of East Asia] (Tokyo: Chuô Daigaku Shuppankai, 1999), pp. 51–52, 65Google Scholar.

123 Esselstrom, Erik W., ‘Rethinking the Colonial Conquest of Manchuria: The Japanese Consular Police in Jiandao 1909–1937’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

124 Nihon gaikô bunsho, 1905, Meijiki, Vol. 38. I, p. 279.

125 Xue, Zhongdong tielu hulujun, pp. 285–286.

126 Gaimushô gaikô shiryôkan [The Diplomatic Record Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Tokyo], F. 1. 9. 2. 5–1 (Tôshi tetsudô kankei zassan [Compilation of Miscellaneous Documents Relating to the Chinese Eastern Railway]).

127 Clubb, Oliver E., China and Russia: The ‘Great Game’ (New York: Columbia University Press, 1971), p. 162Google Scholar.

128 Hong, Xue and Shutian, Li et al. (eds.), Zhongguo dongbei tongshi [A Complete History of Northeast China] (Changchun: Jilin Wenshi Chubanshe, 1991), pp. 529–530Google Scholar.