Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
The interplay of religion and political protest is a familiar theme in Western studies of Japanese Christians who contributed significantly to the socialist movement in their country from the late Meiji period to World War II. Less well known is the fact that a minority of Japanese Buddhists likewise applied the ideals of their faith to political dissent in the movement. Their defiance of the State and the predominantly conservative Buddhist sects which generally supported Emperor, nation, and Empire in Asia constitutes in effect a modern Japanese Buddhist tradition of protest comparable in kind if not in scale to that found in Japanese Christianity. The purpose of the article in hand is to explore this tradition through a study of the Nichiren priest and Buddhist socialist, Seno'o Girō (1889–1961) whose career provides a striking illustration of the Buddhist dimensions of socialism in prewar Japan.
1 For example, see Powles, Cyril, ‘Abe Isoo and the Role of Christians in the Founding of the Japanese Socialist Movement’, Papers on Japan, 1 (Cambridge, Mass., 1961)Google Scholar; Kublin, Hyman, Asian Revolutionary: The Life of Sen Katayama (Princeton, 1964)Google Scholar; Crump, John, The Origins of Socialist Thought in Japan (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Bamba, Nobuya and Howes, John (eds), Pacifism in Japan: The Christian and Socialist Tradition (Kyoto, 1979)Google Scholar; and Bikle, George, The New Jerusalem: Aspects of Utopianism in the Thought of Kagawa Toyohiko (Tucson, Arizona, 1976).Google Scholar
2 On the conservatism of the sects, cf. Enchō, Tamura, ‘Kokumin dōtoku to bukkyō’ in Hōzōkan, (eds), Kōza.: Kindai bukkyō, V (Tokyo, 1961), pp. 21–49.Google Scholar
3 Authoritative books on Seno'o include Takashi, Matsune, Seno'o Girō to Shinkō Bukkyō Seinen Dōmei (Tokyo, 1975)Google Scholar; Masami, Inagaki, Butsuda o seoite gaitō e: Seno'o Girō to Shinkō Bukkyō Seinen Dōmei (Tokyo, 1974)Google Scholar; and Reihō, Hayashi, Seno'o Girō to Shinkō Bukkyō Seinen Dōmei (Tokyo, 1976)Google Scholar. The sole Western study of Seno'o, which emphasizes his thought but not his political career, is Lai, Whalen, ‘Seno'o Girō and the Dilemma of Modern Buddhism: Leftist Prophet of the Lotus Sutra’, Japanese Journal of Religious Studies (03 1984), pp, 7–42.Google Scholar
4 Eishun, Ikeda, Meiji no shinbukkyō undō (Tokyo, 1976).Google Scholar
5 Ryūhō, Kashiwagi, Taigyaku jiken to Uchijyama Gudō (Tokyo, 1979).Google Scholar
6 Tetsuo, Kitagawa, Saikō Mankichi to buraku mondai (Tokyo, 1975).Google Scholar
7 Large, Stephen, ‘Buddhism and Political Renovation in Prewar Japan: The Case of Akamatsu Katsumaro’, Journal of Japanese Studies (Winter, 1983), pp. 33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Shigemoto, Tokoro, Nichiren kyōgaku no shisō kenkyū (Tokyo, 1976), p. 356.Google Scholar
9 Kiyoshi, Shimane, ‘Shinkō Bukkyō Seinen Dōmei: Seno'o Girō’, in Shisō no Kenkyūkai, Kagaku (eds), Tenkō: kyōdō kenkyū, I (Tokyo, 1965), p. 349.Google Scholar
10 Kiyoshi, Shimane, ‘Jinmin sensen: Seno'o Girō to Nakai Shō'ichi’, Gendai no me (02, 1973), p. 159.Google Scholar
11 Wray, William, ‘The Japanese Popular Front, July 1936–February 1938’, Papers on Japan, 6 (Cambridge, Mass., 1972), p. 110.Google Scholar
12 Tetsutarō, Seno'o and Masami, Inagaki (eds), Seno'o Girō nikki, 7 vols (Tokyo, 1974–1975), hereafter SGN.Google Scholar
13 Taijō, Tamamura, Nihon bukkyō shi, III (Tokyo, 1980), pp. 393–411.Google Scholar
14 An excellent survey of the Seinendan is found in Matsune, , Seno'o Girō, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
15 Girō, Seno'o, ‘Mujō yori shin'ai e’, Wakōdo (09 1924)Google Scholar, in Masami, Inagaki (ed.), Seno'o Girō shūkyō ronshū. (Tokyo, 1975), hereafter SGSR.Google Scholar
16 Girō, Seno'o, Hikari o shitaite (Tokyo, 1921)Google Scholar. Seno'o was raised in a Jōdo Shinshū family of unsuccessful saké brewers. His formal education ended when he withdrew in 1911 from the First Higher School in Tokyo due to illness.
17 Naoko, Ichihara, ‘“Zen'ei” o okuru’, in Kinenkai, Seno'o Girō (eds), Seno'o sensei o shinonde (Tokyo, 1974), p. 214Google Scholar. This volume contains interesting vignettes of Seno'o's lifestyle.
18 SGN, 3 (1974), 1 January 1925, p. 3.Google Scholar
19 Yoshirō, Tamura, ‘Kindai nihon no ayumi to nichirenshugi’, in Yoshirō, Tamura and Eishū, Miyazaki (eds), Nihon kindai to nichirenshugi, 4 (Tokyo, 1972), p. 3.Google Scholar
20 Girō, Seno'o, ‘Wakōdo no yobi’, Wakōdo (08 1920), in SGSR, p. 11.Google Scholar
21 Girō, Seno'o, ‘Hei-i naru nichirenshugi’, Wakōdo (05 1924)Google Scholar, in Ibid., pp. 31–49.
22 Girō, Seno'o,‘Yonjū sannen no bukkyō taiken’, in Seno'o sensei o shinonde, pp. 129–30Google Scholar. This essay appeared originally in Gendai chimeijin shinkō seikatsuki (Tokyo, 1956).Google Scholar
23 SGN, 3, 28 11 1927, p. 239.Google Scholar
24 Ibid., 2 May 1928, p. 280.
25 Girō, Seno'o, ‘Kyōsantō jiken ni chokumen shite Ninnō Gokokukyō no issetsu o yomu’, Wakōdo (06 1928), in SGSR, p. 246.Google Scholar
26 Seno'o, , ‘Yonjū sannen’, in Seno'o sensei o shinonde, p. 132.Google Scholar
27 For details on the establishment of the SBSD, cf. Inagaki, , Butsuda, pp. 2–17.Google Scholar
28 An excellent study of this movement is Yui'ichi, Honma, ‘Hanshūkyō undō’, in Saburō, Lenaga (ed.), Nihon shūkyōshi kōza, 4 (Tokyo, 1971), pp. 63–103Google Scholar. 1931 also saw the formation of other movements to revitalize Buddhism, such as Takakasu Junjirō's Zen Nihon Bukkyō Seinen Renmei, with which the SBSD was affiliated until 1933 when Seno'o dissociated the SBSD from the Renmei after the latter rejected his call to oppose fascism. Cf. SGN, 4 (1974), 31 May 1933, p. 160Google Scholar. A broader perspective on ferment in the Japanese religious world in these years is found in Murakami, Shigeyoshi, Japanese Religion in the Modem Century (Tokyo, 1980), pp. 92–4Google Scholar. Matsune, Seno'o Girō and Inagaki, Butsuda o seoite give good accounts of the SBSD's organizational development.
29 ‘Shinkō bukkyō kessei kinen kōenkai no ki’, Shinkō bukkyō no hata no moto ni (05 1931)Google Scholar. This mouthpiece of the SBSD became Shinkō bukkyō in September 1931 and Shinkō bukkyō shimbun in September 1933.
30 The full list of twenty-five objectives is given in Hayashi, , Seno'o Girō, pp. 26–9.Google Scholar
31 Ibid., p. 277 and Shōjun, Mibu, ‘Seno'o-san no erasa to miryoku’, in Seno'o sensei o shinonde, p. 182Google Scholar. Yamamoto changed his surname to Mibu after World War II.
32 Matsune, , Seno'o Girō, p. 160.Google Scholar
33 Given the complexity of Seno'o's ideas, which drew from a wide range of Buddhist and Marxist sources, this is necessarily a brief discussion.
34 A typical example of the hanshūkyō critique is Shūni, Akizawa, Gendai shūkyō hihan kōwa (Tokyo, 1935).Google Scholar
35 Girō, Seno'o, ‘Shinkō bukkyō e no tenshin’, Shinkō bukkyō no hata no moto ni (04 1931), in SGSR, p. 280.Google Scholar
36 Girō, Seno'o, Shakai henkaku tojō no shinkō bukkyō (Tokyo, 1933)Google Scholar, in ibid., pp. 335–7.
37 SGN, 4, 25 03 1931, p. 16Google Scholar and Seno'o, , Shakai henkaku, in SGSR, p. 381.Google Scholar
38 Ibid., p. 366.
39 Ibid., p. 329.
40 SGN, 3, 24 04 1929, p. 365Google Scholar and SGN, 4, 19 02 1933, p. 140.Google Scholar
41 Seno'o, , Shakai henkaku, in SGSR, pp. 330–7 and p. 382.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., p. 367 and Shimane, , ‘Shinkō Bukkyō’, p. 359.Google Scholar
43 Girō, Seno'o, ‘Hanshūkyō undō hihan’, Shinkō bukkyō no hata no moto ni (08 1931), in SGSR, p. 304 and pp. 312–13.Google Scholar
44 Seno'o, , Shakai henkaku, in SGSR, p. 386.Google Scholar
45 Matsune, , Seno'o Girō, p. 15.Google Scholar
46 Ibid., pp. 150–1.
47 Hayashi, , Seno'o Girō, pp. 27–8.Google Scholar
48 Matsune, , Seno'o Girō, p. 8.Google Scholar
49 SGN, 4, 18 09 1931, p. 47.Google Scholar
50 Hayashi, , Seno'o Girō, p. 123.Google Scholar
51 SGN, 4, 24 07 1933, p. 172.Google Scholar
52 Ibid., 4 November 1933, p. 185 and Matsune, , Seno'o Girō, p. 68.Google Scholar
53 SGN, 4, 15 09 1934, p. 224.Google Scholar
54 Ibid., 31 December 1934, p. 236.
55 Ibid., 16 September 1934, p. 225.
56 Ibid., 22 July 1936, pp. 368–9.
57 Ibid., 19 January 1936, p. 322.
58 Shimane, , ‘Jinmin sensen’, p. 157.Google Scholar
59 Inagaki, , Butsuda, pp. 169–70.Google Scholar
60 Eizaburō, Morinaga, ‘Shinkō Bukkyō Seinen Dōmei jiken: bukkyō no kyōdō shakai o mezasu’, Hōgaku seminā (11 1973), p. 109.Google Scholar
61 Reihō, Hayashi, ‘Kaisetsu’, SGN, 4, pp. 419–20.Google Scholar
62 SGN 4, 13 05 1935, p. 260.Google Scholar
63 Ichimei, Kitagawa, ‘Jinmin sensen undō no jidai: 1935–1937’, in Shakaishugi undō shi, vol. 26Google Scholar of Rekishi Kagaku Taikei (Tokyo, 1978), p. 101.Google Scholar
64 SGN, 4, 19 01 1936, p. 322.Google Scholar
65 Ibid., 16 February 1936, pp. 331–2.
66 Cf. Ibid., 29 March 1936, pp. 337–41 regarding his detention.
67 Kitagawa, , ‘Jinmin sensen’, pp. 102–3.Google Scholar
68 SGN, 4, 25 04 1936, p. 352Google Scholar. For a thorough discussion of Rōkyō's development, see Wray, , ‘The Japanese Popular Front’, pp. 105–12.Google Scholar
69 Quoted from Ibid., p. 110. On Sen'o's campaign, see SGN, 4, 10 06 1936, pp. 357–8 and 11 06 1936, p. 358.Google Scholar
70 Ibid., 3 July 1936, p. 364.
71 Inagaki, , Butsuda, p. 182. On Seno'o's arrest, see p. 190.Google Scholar
72 Saburō, Ienaga, ‘Kaisetsu-zadankai’, SGN, 7 (1975), pp. 504–5.Google Scholar
73 Saburō, Ienaga, ‘Kaisetsu’, SGN, 5 (1974), pp. 715–21.Google Scholar
74 Seno'o dissociated the Emperor from fascism and seldom mentioned the Emperor in his political critique of the existing order. Cf. Matsune, , Seno'o Girō, p. 152.Google Scholar
75 Shimane, , ‘Shinkō Bukkyō’, pp. 362–3.Google Scholar
76 The text of Seno'o's statement is found in Matsune, , Seno'o Girō, p. 108Google Scholar. Matsune disputes Inagaki's claim that Sōrai was used as a policy spy to trap Seno'o in an elaborate frame-up. Cf. pp. 15–23Google Scholar and Inagaki, , Butsuda, pp. 180–97.Google Scholar
77 Keijikyoku, Shihōshō, Bukkyō to shakaishugi: shu toshite Shinkō Bukkyō Seinen Dōmei jiken ni tsuite (Tokyo, 1938).Google Scholar
78 Inagaki, , Butsuda, p. 203.Google Scholar
79 Matsune, , Seno'o Girō, pp. 111–17.Google Scholar
80 See, for example, SGN, 5, 6 02 1942, p. 539.Google Scholar
81 Large, Stephen, Organized Workers and Socialist Politics in Interwar Japan (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 207–8.Google Scholar
82 Tokoro, , Nichiren kyōgaku, pp. 361–6.Google Scholar
83 Najita, Tetsuo, Japan: The Intellectual Foundations of Modern Japanese Politics (Chicago, 1974), p. 123.Google Scholar
84 Cf. Ibid., pp. 122–3 concerning the same themes in Kawakami Hajime's thought. A similar emphasis was important for the Christian socialist, Kagawa Toyohiko, as studied in Bikle, New Jerusalem.
85 Duncan, Graeme, Marx and Mill: Two Views of Social Conflict and Social Harmony (Cambridge, 1973), p. 55.Google Scholar
86 Tucker, Robert, Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx (Cambridge, 1961), p. 158.Google Scholar
87 Ibid., p. 156. Also, cf. Ling, Trevor, Buddha, Marx, and God: Some Aspects of Religion in the Modem World (New York, 1979), pp. 169–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar, on the compatibility of Buddhism and Marxism.
88 Hakugen, Ichikawa, Bukkyōsha no sensō sekinin (Tokyo, 1970), p. 162.Google Scholar
89 Murakami, , Japanese Religion, pp. 99–102.Google Scholar
90 Wilson, George, Radical Nationalist in Japan: Kita Ikki, 1883–1937 (Cambridge, Mass., 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
91 Lifton, Robert et al. , (eds), Six Lives, Six Deaths: Portraits From Modem Japan (London, 1979), p. 109.Google Scholar
92 SGN, 5, 30 05 1939, p. 44.Google Scholar
93 SGN, 7, 10 09 1957, p. 237.Google Scholar
94 Inagaki, , Butsuda, p. 228Google Scholar. On aspects of Seno'o's postwar career, see Kyōtoku, Nakano, Kindai nihon no shūkyō to seiji (Tokyo, 1968), pp. 216–26Google Scholar. My paper, ‘For Self and Society: Seno'o Girō and Buddhist Socialism in the Postwar Japanese Peace Movement’, presented to the Fourth National Conference of the Japanese Studies Association of Australia at La Trobe University in May, 1985, also deals with his career after 1945.
95 Kiyota, Minoru, ‘The Buddhist Model for Renewal: An Examination of Contemporary Buddhist Sangha in Asia’, in Miller, Robert (ed.), Religious Ferment in Asia (Lawrence, Kansas, 1974), p. 135.Google Scholar
96 Ichikawa, , Bukkyōsha no sensō sekinin, pp. 159–68Google Scholar. Also, cf. this section of the book translated into English as ‘The Problem of Buddhist Socialism in Japan’, Japanese Religions (08 1970), pp. 15–37.Google Scholar