Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Although they still differ considerably in their willingness to acknowledge it, specialists in the history of north-western Europe in the eleventh and twelfth centuries CE are increasingly treating it as that of the emergence of a new civilization in what had previously been a peripheral region of the Mediterranean-based civilization of the classical west, rather than as a continuation or revival of that civilization itself. In this light Europe, or Latin Christendom as it saw itself, offers a number of striking resemblances to the developments which Lieberman discusses. The most dynamic regions of the new Europe—north-western France, Flanders and lowland England, north-eastern Spain, northern Italy, southern Italy and Sicily—were all peripheral, though in various senses, both to the long-defunct classical civilization and its direct successors, the Byzantine and Abbasid Empires, and to the transitional and much more loosely based ninth-and tenth-century empires of the Franks and Saxons (Ottonians). To this one might add that by the end of the twelfth century the remaining rimlands of the Eurasian continent in a purely geographical sense—Scandinavia, including Iceland, and still more the southern coast of the Baltic and the areas dominated by the rivers which drained into it—were developing very rapidly indeed.
2 Outstanding general accounts include Goff, Jacques le, Medieval Civilization (1964, Engl. trans., Oxford, 1988);Google ScholarBarber, Malcolm, The Two Cities: Medieval Europe, 1050–1320 (London, 1992);Google ScholarFossier, Robert, Enfance de l'Europe, Xe—XIIe siècles: aspects économiques et sociaux (2 vols, Paris, 1982);Google ScholarPoly, J.-P. and Bournazel, E., La mutation féodale (Paris, 1980,Google Scholartrans. The Feudal Transformation, New York, 1991), all with excellent bibliographical information.Google Scholar
3 Lieberman, this volume.
4 As summarized by Bayly, C. A., Imperial Meridian (London, 1989), pp. 35–74.Google Scholar
5 That is to say, in the sense of Childe, V. Gordon, What Happened in History? (Harmondsworth, 1942), meaning the appearance of ‘citied’ or complex civilization, though not with all the implications of Childe's rather mechanistic Marxism. For most European medievalists the phrase ‘urban revolution’ evokes, more straightforwardly,Google Scholarthe world of Pirenne's, HenriMedieval Cities (trans. Halsey, F. D., Princeton, 1925, revised 1952).Google ScholarFor current vigorous debate on the distinct but related argument whether there was a ‘feudal revolution’ around the year 1000, as adumbrated particularly in the writings of Duby, Georges (e.g. The Three Orders, Chicago, 1980)Google Scholarand Bonnassie, Pierre (e.g. From Slavery to Feudalism in Northwestern Europe, Cambridge, 1991),Google Scholara view now powerfully challenged by Barthélmy, Dominique, ‘La mutation féodale, a-t-elle eu lieu? (Note critique)’, Annales ESC xlvii (1992), 767–77;Google ScholarLa société dans la comté de Vendôme de l'an mil au XIVe siècle (Paris, 1993),Google Scholarsee Bisson, Thomas, ‘The Feudal Revolution’, Past and Present 142 (1994),Google Scholar and discussion by Barthélmy, D., White, S. D., Reuter, T. J. and Wickham, C. to appear in Past and Present, nos 152–4 (1996–1997).Google Scholar
6 Chaudhuri, N. K., Asia Before Europe (Cambridge, 1990).Google Scholar
7 This volume.
8 Campbell, J., The Anglo-Saxons (Oxford, 1986);Google ScholarEssays in Anglo-Saxon History (London, 1987);Google ScholarLoyn, H. R., The Governance of Anglo-Saxon England (London, 1984);Google ScholarStafford, P., Unification and Conquest (London, 1989).Google Scholar
9 Chibnall, M., Anglo-Norman England, 1066–1166 (Oxford, 1986);Google ScholarPatourel, J. le, The Norman Empire (Oxford, 1976);Google ScholarDavies, R. R., Domination and Conquest: The Expertence of Ireland, Scotland and Wales (Cambridge, 1990);Google ScholarFrame, Robin, The Political Development of the British Isles, 1100–1400 (Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
10 Dunbabbin, Jean, The Making of France, 843–1180 (Oxford, 1985);Google ScholarHallam, E. M., Capetian France, 987–1328 (London, 1980);Google ScholarDuby, G., France in the Middle Ages, 987–1460 (Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar
11 O'Callaghan, J. F., A History of Medieval Spain (Ithaca, 1975);Google ScholarReilly, Bernard F., The Medieval Spains (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
12 This volume.
13 Bartlett, Robert, The Making of Europe: Conquest, Colonization and Cultural Change, 950–1350 (Princeton, 1993).Google Scholar
14 Galbraith, V. H., The Making of Domesday Book (Oxford, 1961);Google ScholarWarren, W. L., The Governance of Norman and Angevin England (London, 1987);Google ScholarMatthew, Donald, The Norman Kingdom of Sicily (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar
15 For example, Berman, Harold, Law and Revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1983);Google ScholarJordan, W. C., The French Monarchy and the ferns (Philadelphia, 1989);Google ScholarBartlett, Robert, Trial by Fire and Water: The Medieval fudidal Ordeal (Oxford, 1988);Google ScholarMoore, R. I., The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950–1250 (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
16 Bloch, Marc, French Rural History (1931, Engl. trans., London, 1966);Google ScholarDuby, G., Rural Economy and Country Life in the Medieval West (London, 1968);Google ScholarFossier, Robert, Peasant Life in the Medieval West (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
17 Duby, G., The Chivalrous Society (London, 1977);Google ScholarBarthélmy, D., ‘Kinship’, in Duby, G. (ed.), A History of Private Life, II, Revelations of the Medieval World (Cambridge, Mass., 1988), pp. 85–155;Google ScholarCasey, James, The History of the Family (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar
18 There is no agreed account of these connections, but see Duby, G., The Knight, the Lady and the Priest (London, 1983);Google ScholarMoore, R. I., ‘Duby's Eleventh Century’, History 69 (1984), 36–49;Google ScholarHerlihy, David, Medieval Households (Cambridge, Mass., 1985);Google ScholarGoody, Jack, The Development of the Family and Marriage in Europe (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
19 See the famous essay of Duby, G., ‘Youth in Aristocratic Society: Northwestern France in the Twelfth Century’, The Chivalrous Society (above, n. 17), pp. 112–22.Google Scholar
20 Hymes, Robert P., Statesmen and Gentlemen: The Elite of Fou-chou, Chiang-hsi, in Northern and Southern Sung (Cambridge, 1986);Google ScholarFairbank, J. K., China: A New History (Cambridge, Mass., 1992), pp. 94–5.Google Scholar The general contrast with Europe suggested here holds, whether the primary dependence of the elite is supposed to be on the office (Ping-ti, Ho, The Ladder of Perfection in Imperial China (New York, 1962), pp. 92–125)Google Scholar or on the land (Beattie, Hilary J., Land and Lineage in China (Cambridge, 1979);Google ScholarEbrey, Patricia B., Family and Property in Sung China: Yuan Tsai's Precepts for Social Life (Princeton, 1984), pp. 15–17).Google Scholar
21 For a masterly account which gives full weight to these social dimensions, Southern, R. W., Scholastic Humanism and the Unification of Europe (Oxford, 1994).Google Scholar
22 For a strong case against the alleged analogy between the Islamic madraseh and the European university as both developed in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, see Chamberlain, Michael, Knowledge and Social Practice in Medieval Damascus, 1190–1350 (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
23 Duby, G., The Three Orders (above, n. 5 ).Google Scholar
24 For everything connected with the church in this period, Morris, Colin, The Papal Monarchy: The Western Church from 1050–1250 (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar
25 Panofsky, E., Abbot Suger on the Abbey Church of St. Denis and its Art Treasures (2nd ed., Panofsky-Soergel, G., Princeton, 1979);Google ScholarSimson, O. von, The Gothic Cathedral (Princeton, 1956);Google ScholarFrankl, P., Gothic Architecture (London, 1962);Google ScholarConant, K. J., Carolingian and Romanesque Architecture (London, 1959).Google Scholar
26 Rosalind and Christopher Brooke, Popular Religion in the Middle Ages, its title notwithstanding, is a good general account of the religion taught to the laity. Brundage, James A., Law, Sex and Christian Society in Medieval Europe (Chicago, 1987) is a minute but enthralling account of its most intimate intrusions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Moore, R. I., The Origins of European Dissent (London, 1977), pp. 243–62.Google Scholar
28 Lieberman, MS.
29 Historiography in this area is uneven. Finucane, R. C., Miracles and Pilgrims: Popular Belief in Medieval England (London, 1974);Google ScholarWard, Benedicta, Miracles and the Medieval Mind (London, 1982);Google ScholarSigal, P. A, L'Homme et le miracle dans la France médiévale (Paris, 1985);Google Scholarand Sumption, J., Pilgrimage: An Image of Medieval Religion (London, 1975), offer interesting information, analysed with mixed success.Google Scholar
30 For a splendid account of all this, Bartlett, above, n. 13, passim.
31 Keen, Maurice, Chivalry (New Haven, 1984).Google Scholar
32 Spufforth, P., Money and its Uses in Medieval Europe (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 74–131;Google ScholarMontanari, M., The Culture of Food (Oxford, 1994), pp. 38–67;Google ScholarLittle, Lester K., Religious Poverty and the Profit Economy (London, 1978);Google ScholarGoff, Jacques le, Your Money or Your Life (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
33 Contamine, P., War in the Middle Ages (New York, 1984).Google Scholar
34 See Lloyd, Simon in Smith, J. Riley (ed.), Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades (Oxford, 1995), pp. 34–65.Google Scholar
35 Gillingham, John, ‘The Beginnings of English Imperialism’,journal of Historical Sociology 5/4 (1992), 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36 Stock, Brian, The Implications of Literacy (;Princeton, 1983), e.g. at pp. 244–52;Google ScholarMoore, R. I., ‘Literacy and the Making of Heresy, c. 1000–c. 1150’, in Biller, P. and Hudson, A. (eds), Heresy and Literacy, 1000–1530 (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 19–37.Google Scholar
37 Gellner, Ernest, Nations and Nationalism (Oxford, 1993), pp. 8–18.Google Scholar
38 Murray, Alexander, Reason and Society in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
39 Barber, Malcolm, ‘Catharism and the Occitan Nobility: the Lordships of Cabaret, Minerve and Termes’, The Ideals and Practice of Medieval Knighthood, ed. Harper-Bill, C. and Harvey, R. (Woodbridge, 1986), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
40 Given, James, State and Society in Medieval Europe: Gwynnedd and Languedoc under Outside Rule (Ithaca and London, 1990).Google Scholar
41 Lombard, Maurice, The Golden Age of Islam (Amsterdam, 1975);Google ScholarLes métaux dans l'ancien monde du Ve au VIe siècle (Paris, 1974);Google ScholarLeyser, Karl, Medieval Germany and its Neighbours (London, 1982), pp. 69–101.Google Scholar
42 Reuter, T. J., ‘Plunder and Tribute in the Carolingian Empire’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 5/35 (1985), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43 Lughod, Janet Abu, Before European Hegemony (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
44 Compare Bartlett (above, n. 13) with Parker, Geoffrey, The Military Revolution (Cambridge, 1988)Google Scholaror McNeill, W. H., The Pursuit of Power (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
45 Skocpol, Theda, States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge, 1979), p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 Wickham, Chris, ‘The Other Transition: from the Ancient World to Feudalism’, Past and Present 103 (1984), 3–36;Google Scholar‘The Uniqueness of the East’, Journal of Peasant Studies 12, 2/3 (1985), 166–96,Google Scholarreprinted in Baechler, J., Hall, J. A. and Mann, M. (eds), Europe and the Rise of Capitalism (Oxford, 1988), pp. 66–100.Google Scholar
47 Southern, R. W., The Making of the Middle Ages (London, 1953).Google Scholar The once greater temptation represented by the title of a similarly classic account of the European experience, Bloch's, MarcFeudal Society (Paris, 1941, Engl. trans., London, 1963) raises even greater difficulties as a general description, whether the word feudal is employed with its Marxist connotationsGoogle Scholar (as by Wickham or Anderson, Perry, Passages from Feudalism to Antiquity (London, 1974)), or as Bloch preferred, with reference to a shared set of legal principles relating the tenure of land to the holding of public office and the performance of public obligation, which is no longer generally thought applicable even to western Europe itself in the period under discussion:Google Scholar cf. Reynolds, Susan, Fiefs and Vassals New York, 1994).Google Scholar
48 Shaffer, Lynda, ‘Southernization’ Journal of World History 5, 1 (1994), 1–21.Google Scholar