Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:29:04.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Technical Co–operation’ Between the League of Nations and China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jürgen Osterhammel
Jürgen Osterhammel
Affiliation:
Gesamthochschule Kassel, West Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When in August 1933 the German Minister to China, Dr Oskar P. Trautmann, reported to Berlin, ‘daβ die Völkerbundsmelodie politisch hier ausgespielt hat’, he had jumped to a conclusion too soon. When two years later the Journal Round Table commented, ‘to-day the League of Nations is no longer a political factor in the Far East’, this assessment was vindicated by evidence of every description. The two years between had witnessed the peak and decline of the League of Nation's ‘technical co-operation’ with the National Government of China. This episode plays its part as one of the major accomplishments of the League during the dismal second decade of its existence. It figures, however, only marginally in the history of twentieth-century China. Western works on modern Chinese history tend to neglect it altogether, and the most comprehensive scholarly treatment of China's foreign relations during the Republican period does not even deem it worth a reference in passing. On the other hand, the one authoritative textbook on modern Chinese economic history published in the People's Republic of China devotes ample space to the denunciation of the League's Chinese enterprise.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1979 , pp. 661 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The author wishes to thank Dr Ian Nish for criticism and advice.

1 Trautmann to von Bülow, 24 August 1933, Akten zur Deutschen Auswärtigen Politik 1918–1945, Serie C: 1933–1937, Vol. 1/2 (Göttingen, 1971), No. 410, p. 761.Google Scholar

2 ‘Japan in China’, The Round Table, No. 100 (September 1935), p. 692.Google Scholar

3 Ch'i-hsüeh, Fu, Chung-kuo wai-chiao shih (Taipei, 1957).Google Scholar

4 ta-hsüeh, Hu-pei cheng-chih ching-chi-hsüeh chiao-yen-tsu, Chung-kuo chin-tai kuo-min ching-chi shih (Peking, 1958), p. 359.Google Scholar

5 Ghébali, V.-Y., ‘Aux origines de l'ECOSOC:l'évolution des commissions et organisations techniques de la Société des Nations’, Annuaire Française du Droit International, Vol. 18 (1972), p. 483.Google ScholarCf.Ghébali, V.-Y., ‘The League of Nations and Functionalism’, in: Groom, A. J. R. and Taylor, P. (eds), Functionalism. Theory and Practice in International Relations (London, 1975), pp. 141–61.Google Scholar

6 Lien-teh, Wu et al. , Manchurian Plague Prevention Service. Memorial Volume, 1912–1932 (Shanghai, 1934);Google ScholarLien-teh, Wu, Plague Fighter. The Autobiography of a Modern Chinese Physician (Cambridge, 1959).Google Scholar

7 League of Nations. Health Committee, Minutes of the Fourth Session Held at Geneva, August 4th to 21st, 1922 (Off. No. C.555.M.337.1922.III), p. 35.Google Scholar

8 White, F. N., The Prevalence of Epidemic Disease and Port Health Organisation and Procedure in the Far East (Geneva, 1923) (Off. No. C.167.M.43.1924.III), p. 101.Google Scholar

9 League of Nations. Health Organisation. Bureau, Eastern, Annual Report for 1925 (Singapore 1926), pp. 1, 7.Google Scholar

10 Meienberger, N., Entwicklungshilfe unter dem Völkerbund. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der internationalen Zusammenarbeit in der Zwischenkriegszeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der technischen Hilfe an China (Winterthur, 1965), p. 44.Google Scholar

11 Walters, F. P., A History of the League of Nations (London, 1952), p. 330.Google Scholar

12 Article on Rajchman, in Wielka Encyklopedia Powszechna Pwn, Vol. IX (Warsaw, 1967), p. 687;Google Scholarobituary in The New York Times, 25 July 1965, p. 69.Google Scholar

13 Buchanan to Murray, 8 April 1926, Public Record Office (London), F.O. 371/11688 (F 1487).

14 Meienberger, , Entwicklungshilfe unter dem Völkerbund, pp. 51f.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., p. 59.

16 League of Nations. Council. Minutes of the Sessions, 1931, p. 1173.Google Scholar

17 Gilbert (Geneva) to Hull, 13 July 1934, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1934, III, p. 399, reporting a conversation with Rajchman.Google Scholar

18 Avenol, J., Memo of conversation with Yokoyama, Japanese Consular-General at Geneva, 1 May 1934, F.O. 371/18098 (F 2700).Google Scholar

19 The Times, 10 November 1931; cf. Japan Times, 12 November 1931.

20 University of Nanking. College of Agriculture and Forestry. Department of Agricultural Economics (John Lossing Buck), The 1931 Floods in China (Nanking, 1932), pp. 10, 35.Google Scholar

21 National Flood Relief Commission, Report 1931–32 (Shanghai, 1933), p. 299.Google Scholar

22 League of Nations, Quarterly Bulletin of the Health Organization, Vol. I (1932), p. 146.Google Scholar

23 Tawney, R. H., Land and Labour in China (London, 1932);Google ScholarCf. Terrill, R., R. H. Tawney and His Time. Socialism as Fellowship (London, 1974), pp. 61–71.Google Scholar

24 Becker, C. H. et al. , The Reorganization of Education in China (Paris, 1932), p. 25.Google Scholar For a detailed analysis of the Becker mission Cf. Neugebauer, E., Anfänge pädagogischer Entwicklungshilfe unter dem Völkerbund in China (Hamburg, 1971).Google Scholar

25 Becker, et al. , The Reorganization of Education in China, p. 28.Google Scholar

26 Meienberger, , Entwicklungshilfe unter dem Völkerbund, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar For a cogent discussion of the Dragoni report Cf. Wen-chih, Pai, ‘Kuo-lien yü Chung-kuo chih chi-shu ho-tso’, Tung-fang tsa-chih, Vol. 30, No. 13 (1 07 1933), p. 110.Google Scholar

27 Chia-chü, Ch'ien (ed.), Chung-kuo kung-chai shih-liao (Peking, 1955), pp. 22f.Google Scholar

28 China. Ministry of Industries, Silver and Prices in China. Report of the Committee for the Study of Silver Values and Commodity Prices (Shanghai, 1935), p. 12, and passim.Google Scholar

29 The Chamber of Commerce Journal (London), Vol. 65 (1933), p. 422.Google Scholar This report is dated ‘Shanghai, March 1933’.

30 Cf. Nish, I. H., Japanese Foreign Policy 1869–1942. Kasumigaseki to Miyakezaka (London 1977), pp. 183ff.Google Scholar

31 North China Herald; 22 February 1933, p. 283.Google Scholar

32 Journal of the Monetary and Economic Conference, No. 6, 16 06 1933, p. 34.Google Scholar

33 League of Nations, Official Journal (September 1933), p. 1064.Google Scholar

34 Pratt, Memo, 27 March 1933, F.O. 371/17127 (F 2117).Google Scholar

35 Lampson to Foreign Office, 26 March 1933, F.O. 371/17127 (F 2034); Johnson to Hull, 30 March 1933, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1933, III, p. 494.Google Scholar

36 Orde, , Minute, 28 – 1933, F.O. 371/17127 (F 2117).Google Scholar

37 Orde, , Minute, 22 March 1933, F.O. 371/17127 (F 1842).Google Scholar

38 Chugai, , quoted in Japan Times, 26 July 1933.Google Scholar

39 Finance and Commerce (Shanghai), 4 April 1934, p. 401.Google Scholar

40 Memo by Soong, T. V., Foreign Relations of the United States, 1933, III, p. 496.Google ScholarCf. Young, A. N., China's Nation-Building Effort, 1927–1937. The Financial and Economic Record (Stanford, 1971), pp. 360–4, for a more detailed account.Google Scholar

41 Finance and Commerce, 6 June 1934, pp. 653f.;Google ScholarMonnet, J., Mémoires (Paris, 1976), pp. 130–6;Google ScholarCh'üan-kuo yin-hang nien-chien (Shanghai, 1936), p. J 42.Google Scholar

42 Rajchman had a very favourable paragraph on the CDFC in his first draft of his report to the Council. It was later omitted in the printed version. Cf. Pratt Minute, 4 June 1934, F.O. 371/18098 (F 3252).

43 Cf. Tun-wei, Lo, Chung-kuo t'ung-chih ching-chi lun (2nd edn, Shanghai, 1935), pp. 20–35;Google ScholarFong, H. D., Toward Economic Control in China (Tientsin, 1936).Google Scholar

44 On the activities of the Commission cf. Shanghai shih nien-chien (Shanghai, 1937), pp. P 26–9;Google ScholarCoble, P. M. Jr, ‘The Shanghai Capitalist Class and the Nationalist Government, 1927–1937’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, 1975), pp. 261–3.Google Scholar

45 Shen-pao nien-chien (Shanghai, 1936), p. 416.Google Scholar

46 Salter, A., ‘China and the Depression’, The Economist, No. 118, 19 05 1934, Supplement, p. 14;Google Scholar League of Nations, Council Committee on Technical Cooperation between the League of Nations and China, Report of the Technical Agent of the Council on His Mission to China (Geneva, 1934) (Off. No. C.157.M.66.1934), pp. 45–51.Google Scholar Henceforth quoted as ‘Rajchman Report’. For reference Cf. I-shih, Chou, Chung-kuo kung-lu shih (Taipei, 1957), pp. 116ff.Google Scholar

47 National Economic Council. Bureau of Roads, Highways in China (Nanking, 1936), unpaginated.Google Scholar

48 Ibid.

49 Nathan, A. J., A History of the China International Famine Relief Commission (Cambridge, Mass., 1965), p. 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50 Editorial, ‘Sung Tzŭ-wen tao Hsi-pei’, Shen-pao yüeh-k'an, Vol. 3, No. 5 (May 1934), p. 7.Google Scholar

51 Han-ju, Liu, ‘I-nien-lai ti kung-lu chien-shě’, Wen-hua chien-shě, Vol. 2, No. 3 (12 1935), p. 81.Google Scholar

52 Cf. Sommer, W., ‘Zur Rolle deutscher Berater in den Einkreisungs- und Vernichtungsfeldzügen gegen die südchinesische Sowjetrepublik’, Zeitschrift für Politik, N.F. 18 (1971), p. 299.Google Scholar

53 Rajchman Report, p. 27.Google Scholar

54 Ibid., p. 23.

55 Amann, G., Bauernkrieg in China. Chiang Kai-sheks Kampf gegen den Aufstand 1932–1935 (Heidelberg, 1939), pp. 121ff;Google ScholarTaylor, G. E., ‘Reconstruction after Revolution:Kiangsi Province and the Chinese Nation’, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 8 (1935), pp. 302–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56 League of Nations, Official Journal (July 1935), p. 930.Google Scholar

57 Chih-wu, Ou-yang, ‘La-hsi-man pao-kao chih chien-t'ao’, Shen-pao yüeh-k'an, Vol. 3, No. 6 (06 1934), p. 27.Google Scholar

58 Cf.Durau, Joachim, ‘Die Krise der chinesischen Agrarökonomie’, in Lorenz, R., (ed.), Umwälzung einer Gesellschaft. Zur Sozialgeschichte der chinesischen Revolution (1911–1949) (Frankfurt a.M., 1977), pp. 94–193.Google Scholar

59 Among a vast literature e.g. Bland, J. O. P., China: The Pity of It (London, 1932);Google ScholarWoodhead, H. G. W., A Journalist in China (London, 1934).Google Scholar

60 Rajchman Report, p. 70.Google Scholar

61 Meienberger, , Entwicklungshilfe unter dem Völkerbund, p. 95.Google Scholar

62 League of Nations, Report by the Committee of Experts on Hydraulic and Road Questions in China (Geneva, 1936) (Off. No. C.91.M.34.1936.III), p. 196.Google Scholar

63 National Economic Council, Report for 1935 (Nanking, 1936), p. 5;Google Scholar National Economic Council, Report for 1936 (Nanking, 1937), p. 47.Google Scholar

64 Ghébali, , ‘Aux origines de l'ECOSOC’, p. 496.Google Scholar

65 Barros, J., Betrayal from Within (New Haven/London 1969), pp. 44f.Google Scholar

66 Documents on International Affairs 1934 (London, 1935), p. 472.Google Scholar

67 Vansittart, Minute, 18 June 1934, F.O. 371/18091 (F 3622).

68 Gilbert to Hull, 1 September 1934, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1934, III, pp. 410f.Google Scholar

69 League of Nations, Report Submitted to the Secretary-General by the Director of the Section for Communications and Transit, Secretary of the Council Committee, on His Mission to China (Geneva, 1935) (Off. No. C.410.M.206.1935), p. 5.Google Scholar

70 Ibid., p. 30.

71 Haas, , letter to Chin Fen, Secretary-General of the National Economic Council, 3 April 1935, enclosed in F.O. 371/19320 (F 3481). This file also contains Haas’ lengthy letter to Chiang Kai-shek.Google Scholar

72 Cf. Ch'i-sheng, Ch'i, ‘I-nien-lai ti Chung-kuo ching-chi’, Wen-hua chien-shê, Vol. 2, No. 3 (12 1935), pp. 35–43.Google Scholar

73 Chen, L. M., The Co-operative Movement in China (Nanking, 1936), p. 24.Google Scholar

74 Johnson to Hull, 25 September 1935, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1935, III, p. 623.Google Scholar