Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:19:32.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Subordination of the Sovereigns: Colonialism and the Gond Rajas in Central India, 1818–1948*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2012

BHANGYA BHUKYA
BHANGYA BHUKYA*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Exclusion Studies, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad 500007, India Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

British colonial intervention in India had sought to establish an exclusive sovereignty as was embodied in the modern state of the West. India had a tradition of existence of multiple sovereignties even during the times of strong imperial powers. Pre-colonial imperial powers had enjoyed symbolic sovereignty particularly over forest and hill areas, while local powers had undisputed sovereignty over resources and people in their territories. The British colonial state disturbed this shared sovereignty by assimilating the local sovereign powers into the state through a programme of colonial modernity, treaties, agreements and by force. This process produced contested histories. However, local powers such as the Gond Rajas were, to some extent, reduced to a subordinate position.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 288 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented to the South Asian History Seminar at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London. I am grateful to Shabnum Tejani, Peter Robb, and Sunil Kumar for their valuable comments and suggestions. I am thankful to David Hardiman for his searching and suggestive comments, which helped me extensively reframe the paper. I would also like to acknowledge with thanks the British Academy, which funded this study.

References

1 Eyre, Chatterton. (1916). The Story of Gondwana, Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons, Ltd., London, pp. 60–69;Google Scholar also see Skaria, Ajay. (1999). Hybrid Histories. Forests, Frontiers and Wildness in Western India, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp. 165–175.Google Scholar

2 Jenkins, Richard. (1827). Report on the Territories of the Rajah of Nagpore. Submitted to the Supreme Government of India, The Government Gazette Press, Calcutta, p. 251.Google Scholar

3 James, C. Scott. (2009). The Art of Not Being Governed. An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia, Yale University Press, New Haven, p. 3.Google ScholarPubMed

4 Jenkins, Report on the Nagpore Territories, p. 139; Sundar, Nandini. (1997). Subalterns and Sovereigns. An Anthropological History of Bastar (1858–1996), Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp. 90–92.Google Scholar

5 Nicholas B. Dirks has shown how the Raja of Pudukkottai in south India was made powerless under the colonial paramount power. See Dirks, Nicholas B.. (1993). The Hollow Crown. Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, p. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Von Furer-Haimendorf, Christoph. (1945). Tribal Hyderabad. Four Reports, The Revenue Department, Government of H.E.H. the Nizam, Hyderabad, p. 67.Google Scholar

7 Grigson, W. V.. (1944). The Aboriginal Problem in the Central Provinces and Berar, Government Printing, C.P and Berar, Nagpur, pp. 465–509.Google Scholar

8 Sundar, Subalterns and Sovereigns; Skaria, Hybrid Histories.

9 Eyre, The Story of Gondwana, pp. 1–11.

10 Central Provinces District Gazetteers, Chanda District. (1909). (hereafter Chanda District Gazetteers), The Pioneer Press, Allahabad, pp.97–98.

11 Smith, C. B. Lucie. (1869). Report on the Land Revenue Settlement of the Chanda District, Central Provinces, The Chief Commissioner's Office Press, Nagpur, p. 61.Google Scholar

12 The names are Bhim Ballal Singh (870), Khurja Ballal Singh (895), Heer Sing (935), Andia Ballal Singh (970), Tulwar Singh (995) Keshur Singh (1027) Dinkur Singh (1072), Ram Sing (1142), Surja Bullal Singh (Sher Shah Ballal Shah) (1207), Khandkia Ballal Shah (1242), Heer Shah (1282) Bhooma and Lokba, two brothers jointly held the throne (1342), Kundia Shah also known as Kurn Shah (1402), Babajee Ballal Shah (1442) Dhoondia Ram Shah (1522) Krishna Shah (1597) Beer Shah (1647), Ram Shah (1672) and Nilkanth Shah (1735–1751), see Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, pp. 60–69.

13 Habib, Irfan. (1982). An Atlas of the Mughal Empire, Oxford University Press, DelhiGoogle Scholar, sheet 9A; Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, pp. 61–66.

14 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 69.

15 Chanda District Gazetteers, pp. 37–38.

16 On this, see Wills, C. U.. (1923). The Raj-Gond Maharajas of the Satpura Hills, The Central Provinces Government Press, Nagpur, pp. 6–7;Google Scholar and Setumadhava Pagdi, Rao. (1949). Among the Gonds of Adilabad, Popular Book Depot, Bombay, pp.15–16.Google Scholar

17 Eyre, The Story of Gondwana, pp. 53–61.

18 Stephen Hislop's Papers Relating to the Aboriginal Tribes of the Central Provinces, IOR/F/4/755/20541, p. iv; also Pagdi, Among the Gonds, pp. 15–20.

19 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, pp. 63–64.

20 Ibid. p. 66.

21 Faz, Allami Abul. (1891). The Ain-i-Akbari, translated by Jarrett, H. S., Vol. 2, The Baptist Mission Press, Calcutta, p. 230.Google Scholar

22 Pagdi, Among the Gonds, pp.26–27.

23 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 70.

24 Hislop's Papers Relating to the Aboriginal, p. v.

25 Jenkins, Report on the Nagpore Territories, p. 88.

26 Pagdi, Among the Gonds, p. 28; Thusu, Kidar Nath. (1980). Gond Kingdom of Chanda. With Particular Reference to its Political Structure, Anthropological Survey of India, Calcutta, p. 247.Google Scholar

27 Chanda District Gazetteer, p. 54.

28 Thusu, Gond Kingdom of Chanda, pp. 227–228.

29 Elwin, Verrier. (1946). Folk-Songs of Chhattisgarh, Oxford University Press, Madras, pp. 280–286.Google Scholar

30 Sundar, Subalterns and Sovereigns, p. 23.

31 Jenkins, Report on the Nagpore Territories, p. 252.

32 David Hardiman and Ajay Skarias provide a full history of Bhil raids in western India. See Hardiman, David. ‘Power in the Forest: The Dangs, 1820–1940’, in Arnold, David and Hardiman, David. (1994). eds, Subaltern Studies VIII. Essays in Honour of Ranajit Guha, Oxford University Press, Delhi, pp. 99–100;Google ScholarSkarias, Ajay. (1999). Hybrid Histories. Forest, Frontiers and Wildness in Western India, Oxford University Press, Delhi [5].Google Scholar

33 Early European Travellers in the Nagpur Territories: Reprinted from Old Records (1930). The Government Press, Nagpur, pp. 119–121.

34 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 72.

35 Eyre, The Story of Gondwana, p. 94.

36 Bhukya, Bhangya. (2010). Subjugated Nomads: The Lambadas under the Rule of the Nizams, Orient Black Swan, New Delhi, pp. 46–47.Google Scholar

37 Chanda District Gazetteers, p. 55.

38 IOR, Board's Collection, F/4/755/20541, ff. 74, 135–141.

39 Jenkins, Report on the Nagpore Territories, p. 251.

40 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 75.

41 Eyre, The story of Gondwana, p. 101.

42 Chanda District Gazetteer, pp. 57–58.

43 Letter no. 8, from Commissioner (hereafter Comm.) of Nagpur to Deputy (hereafter Dy.) Commissioner of Chanda, dated 7 May 1858, IOR/L/PS/6/460, ff. 239.

44 Letter no. 49, Comm. of Nagpur to Secretary Government of India, IOR/ L/PS/6/460, f. 231.

45 Letter from Comm. of Nagpur to Resident of Hyderabad dt. 7 May 1858, IOR/ L/PS/6/460, f. 238.

46 Letter no. 23, Comm. of Nagpur to Dy. Comm. of Chanda dt. 5 July 1858, IOR/ L/PS/6/460, f. 279.

47 Andhra Pradesh District Gazetteers, Adilabad (1976). The Government Central Press, Hyderabad, pp. 33–34; The Freedom Struggle in Hyderabad. A Connected Account, 1857–1885. (1956). Vol. II, Hyderabad, pp. 118–120, 156–157.

48 Letter, Comm. of Nagpur to Resident of Hyderabad dt. 7 May 1858, IOR/ L/PS/6/460, f. 238.

49 The Freedom Struggle in Hyderabad, p. 157.

50 Letter no. 53, Dy. Comm. of Chanda to Comm. of Nagpur, dt. 8 May 1858, IOR/L/PS/6/460, f. 243.

51 Letter no. 2, Dy. Comm. of Chanda to Comm. of Nagpur, dt. 3 May 1857, IOR/ L/PS/6/460, f. 233.

52 Letter no. 2, Dy. Comm. of Chanda to Comm. of Nagpur, dt. 3 May 1858, IOR/ L/PS/6/460, f. 233.

53 Letter no. 63, Comm. of Nagpur to Secretary Govt. of India, dt. 28 May 1858, IOR/ L/PS/6/460, f. 254.

54 Letter no. 18, Comm. of Nagpur to Dy. Comm. of Chanda dt. 8 June 1858, IOR/L/PS/6/460, f. 265.

55 Letter no. 74, Dy. Comm. Chanda to Comm. of Nagpur dt. 3 June 1858, IOR/L/PS/6/460, ff. 267–68.

56 Letter no. 71, Dy. Comm. of Chanda to Comm. of Nagpur dt. 17 June 1858, IOR/L/PS/6/460, ff. 272–73.

57 Letter no. 87, Comm. of Nagpur to Secretary Government of India, IOR/L/PS/6/460, f. 278.

58 Letter no 23, Comm. of Nagpur to Dy. Comm. of Chanda dt. 5 July 1858. IOR/L/PS/6/460, f. 288; Letter no 88, Dy. Comm. of Chanda to Comm. of Nagpur, IOR/L/PS/6/460, f. 280.

59 Letter no 90, Dy. Comm. of Chanda to Comm. of Nagpur dt. 6 July 1858, IOR/L/PS/6/460, f. 282.

60 Letter no 25, Comm. of Nagpur to Dy. Comm. of Chanda dt. 8 July 1858, IOR/L/PS/6/460, f. 283; Letter no 87, Dy. Comm of Chanda to Comm. of Nagpur dt. 20 July 1858, IOR/L/PS/6/460, f. 283.

61 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 76.

62 Letter no. 7 from Lt. Col. Broughton to N. B. Edmonstone, Secretary to Government, 2 April, 1804, Selection from the Nagpur Residency Records, 1799–1806. (1950). Vol. I, Compiled by H. N. Sinha, Government Printing, M.P., Nagpur, pp. 53–56.

63 Skarias, Hybrid Histories, pp. 193–194, see also Hardiman, ‘Power in the Forest’, p. 110.

64 On this, see Vadivelu, A.. (1915). The Ruling Chiefs, Nobles and Zamindars of India, Vol. 1, Guardian Press, Madras, pp. 74–84;Google ScholarAberigh-Mackay, G. R.. (1878). The Chiefs of Central India, Vol. 1, Thacker, Spink and Co., Calcutta, p. xiv.Google Scholar

65 Chanda District Gazetteers, p. 324.

66 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 184.

67 Letter no. 162, Dy. Secretary Foreign Department to Chief Comm. of Central Provinces (CP) dt. 28 May 1867, Vidarbha Archieve, Political and Military (PM), S. N. 1477, File no. 5–8/1951, f. 1; Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 70.

68 Chanda District Gazetteers, p. 136.

69 Letter no. 1470, Dy. Secretary Foreign Department to Chief Comm. of CP, dt. 19 September 1903, Vidarbha, PM, S. N. 1477, File no. 5–8/1951, f. 3.

70 Ibid., f. 4.

71 Ibid., 2.

72 Out of the 20 zamindaris four were transferred to Drug District in 1907, see Chanda District Gazetteer, p. 443.

73 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, pp. 180, 206.

74 Pagdi, Among the Gonds, pp. 29–30.

75 Report on the Administration of His Highness the Nizam's Dominions for the Year 1294F (1884–1885) (1886). The Times of India Press, Bombay, p. 258; Imperial Gazetteeer of India, Provincial Series, Hyderabad. (1909). Superintendent of Government Printing, Calcutta, p. 190.

76 Pagdi, Among the Gonds, p. 39.

77 Grigson, W. V.. (1947). The Challenge of Backwardness, Government Press, Hyderabad Deccan, p. 41.Google Scholar

78 Pagdi, Among the Gonds, pp. 37–50.

79 Final Report on the Land Revenue Settlement of the Chanda District in the Central Provinces, Effected During the Years 1897–06, IOR/W/1429, p. 4.

80 Ibid., p. 75; Chanda District Gazetteers, p. 448.

81 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, pp. 179–183.

82 Chanda District Gazetteers, p. 446.

83 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 181.

84 Vidarbha, Revenue Department (RD), S. no. 5916, F. no. 6/1945, f. 36.

85 The Central Province Court of Wards Manual. (1902). The Secretariat Press, Nagpur, pp. 2–3.

86 Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 1608, F.no. 7-16/1927, f. 1.

87 Chanda District Gazetteers, pp. 448–452.

88 Vidarbha, Survey and Settlement (SS), S.no. 969, F. no. 4-39/1923, ff.11-12.

89 Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 5916, F. no. 6/1945, f. 46.

90 Chanda District Gazetteers, p. 451.

91 Vidharba, RD, S.no. 1608, F.no. 7-16/1927, f.2.

92 Grigson, W. V.. (1944). The Aboriginal Problem in the Central Provinces and Berar. Government Press, Nagpur, p. 419.Google Scholar

93 Rajkumar Collge Raipur Annual Report, 1936–1937. The Catholic Orphan Press, Calcutta, pp. 1–22.

94 Eyre, The Story of Gondwana, p. 109.

95 Vidharba, RD, S. no. 1608, F. no. 7-16/1927, f.3; Grigson, The Aboriginal Problem, p. 419.

96 Grigson, The Aboriginal Problem, p. 372.

97 Ibid., p. 495.

98 Ibid., pp. 371–72.

99 Vidarbha, RD, S. no. 5916, F. no. 6/1945, f. 2.

100 Report on the Administration of the Central Provinces for the Year 1900–1901. (1901). The Secretariat Press, Nagpur, p. 66.

101 Grigson, The Aboriginal Problem, p. 397.

102 Ibid., p. 497.

103 Ibid., p. 507.

104 Report on the Ethnological Committee on Paper laid Before them and upon Examination of Specimens of Aboriginal Tribes Brought to the Jubblepore Exhibition of 1866–67. (1868). Chief Commissioner's Office Press, Nagpur, IOR/V/9484, p. 2.

105 Ibid., p. 67.

106 Hislop's papers, IOR/V/27/910/49, f. 12; Chanda District Gazetteers, pp. 66–68.

107 Haimendorf, Tribal Hyderabad, pp. 66–154.

108 Vidarbha, SS, S. no. 920, F. no. 4-7/1922, ff.2–4.

109 Report on the Administration of the Central Provinces 1901–02, p. 44.

110 Grigson, The Aboriginal Problem, p. 8.

111 Report on the Administration of the Central Provinces 1901–02, p. 44.

112 Grigson, The Aboriginal Problem, p. 454.

113 Hislop's papers, IOR/V/27/910/49, f. 12.

114 Grigson, The Aboriginal Problem, pp. 374–375.

115 Jenkins, Report on the Nagpore Territories, pp.140–141.

116 In the Nizam territories the Raja of Sirpur and Raja of Utnur were called by the honorary title of Raja. Even in the British territories people address the Zamindars as Rajas. See Pagadi, Among the Gonds, p. 39.

117 Vidarbha, RD, S. no. 1596, F. 58-4/1927, ff. 1–8.

118 Vidarbha, RD, S. No. 5916, F. no. 6/1945, 1; Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 3461, F.no. 48-9/1933, f. 2. Sundar has brought out the power relations articulated in the Dussehra celebration in Bastar. She says the Gond Rajas used the Dasehra celebration not only to impose their authority over the subordinate chiefs but also to relate themselves with the larger caste-Hindu ruling values. See. Sundar,Subalterns and Sovereigns, pp. 47–76.

119 Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 5916, F.no. 6/1945, f. 2.

120 Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 5916, F. no. 6/1945, ff. 36–37.

121 Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 2882, F. no. 58–7/1931, f. 2.

122 Hardiman, ‘Power in the Forest’, pp. 112–116.

123 Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 2882, F. no. 58–7/1931, f. 2.

124 Ibid., ff. 7–12.

125 Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 5916, F. no. 6/1945, ff. 17–19.

126 Ibid., f. 16.

127 Ibid., f. 21.

128 It was reported that collectively zamindars consumed 31 bottles of whisky, 482 quart bottles of beer, 270 pint bottles of beer, and 8 bottles of brandy between January 1941 and February 1942, see Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 5916, F. no. 6/1945, f. 111. For his wives and concubines see Ibid., f. 112.

129 Ibid., f. 37.

130 Chanda District Gazetteers, p. 136.

131 Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 5916, F. no. 6/1945, f. 112.

132 Chanda District Gazetteer, p. 462.

133 Chanda District Gazetteer, p. 460.

134 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 183.

135 Haimendorf, Tribal Hyderabad, p. 67.

136 Smith, Report on the Land Revenue Settlement, p. 206.

137 Vidarbha, PM, S.no. 1478, F.no. 5-3/1951, f. 2; Vidarbha, RD, S.no. 2882, F.no. 58-7/1931, f. 5.

138 Haimendorf, Tribal Hyderabad, pp. 63–65; Pagdi, Among the Gonds, p. 29.

139 Pagdi, Among the Gonds, pp. 38–39.

140 Haimendorf, Tribal Hyderabad, p. 135.

141 Grigson, ‘The Aboriginal in the Future India’, p. 35.

142 Ibid., pp. 33–34.

143 Grigson, The Aboriginal Problem, pp. 54, 417.

144 Ibid. p. 454.

145 Ibid., p. 54.

146 On this, see Hardiman, David. (1996). Feeding the Baniya: Peasants and Usurers in Western India, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp. 43–61.Google Scholar