Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:41:43.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Quasi-War in East Asia: Japan's Expedition to Taiwan and the Ryūkyū Controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Edwin Pak-Wah Leung
Edwin Pak-Wah Leung
Affiliation:
Seton Hall University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 1870s witnessed mounting tension among East Asian countries. In 1874,. Japan sent an expeditionary force to Taiwan to punish the aborigines there who had, in 1871, killed fifty-four shipwrecked Ryūkyūans (Liu-ch'iuans). By doing so, according to many scholars today, Japan was able to claim retroactively that the Ryūkyūan castaways were legally Japanese subjects, thereby ending the Sino-Japanese dispute over the ambiguous political status of the Ryūkyū Islands (the Chūzan Kingdom of Ryūkyū paid tribute to both China and the Satsuma-han of Japan before the 18705).

This paper is a reappraisal of this episode of the ‘Quasi-war’ in East Asia. By going into the Chinese, Japanese, Ryūkyūan, and Western sources, it unfolds some unknown events which directly and indirectly led to the Japanese decision to send forces to Taiwan, as well as the Chinese reactions. The conclusion of this paper refutes the customary view which holds that China had in 1874 ‘renounced her claim over Ryūkyū and yielded to the Japanese claim she had earlier disputed.’ As this paper will show, neither Soejima Taneomi nor Ōkubo Toshimichi had succeeded in securing any Chinese endorsement of Japan's sovereign right over Ryūky¯. Nor did the Sino-Japanese Treaty of 1874, concerning the settlement of the Taiwan crisis, legally settle the Ryūkyū problem, since Ryūky¯ was never mentioned in the Treaty. As a result, the issue continued to trouble Peking and Tokyo in the years that immediately followed.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 257 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For details, see: Gaimusho, , Ryūkyū huhan jiryaku (Ryūkyū feudal province digest) (2 vols, 1873);Google Scholar Kyokei, Kobayashi (comp.), Ryūkyū-han shi (History of the Ryūkyū domain) (2 vols, 1874).Google Scholar

2 NGB, V. no. 177, enclosure; Sanjō Sanetomi Kō nenfu (Biographical chronicle of Sanjō Sanetomi) (Tokyo, 1969), 27: 7b–10a.Google Scholar

3 NGB: TH, I, 227.

4 Shimbun shūsei Meiji hennen shi (A chronological history of Meiji Japan based on materials from newspapers) (15 vols, Tokyo, 1965).Google Scholar

5 IWSM:TC, 77:35.

6 See my article in Chinese: Po-hua, Liang, ‘Yang-wu yun-tungshih-ch'i Man-ch'ing wai-chiao cheng-ts'e chuan-pien ti shen-chueh’ (Diplomatic change in China during the Self-Strengthening Movement period), Shih-ch'ao 7 (10 1971), 7–24.Google Scholar

7 See note 5.

8 NGB:TH, I: 142; IWSM:TC, 96:27–32.

9 See, for example, Hiyoshi, Sonoda, Etō Shimpei to Saga no ran (Eto Shímpei and the Saga Rebellion) (Tokyo, 1974), passim.Google Scholar

10 OKS, II:110.

11 Kiyoshi, Tabohashi, ‘Ryūkyū hanmin bangai jiken ni kansuru kōsatsu’ (An investigation of the outrage suffered by the natives of Ryūkyū at the hands of the aborigines in Taiwan) in Ichimura Hakushi koki kinen Tōyōshi rōnso (Fuzambo, 1933), 663–88;Google Scholar Shō, Yamanaka, ‘Miyako tōmin no Taiwan sōgai’ (Victims of the Miyako Islanders in Taiwan in 1871), Nanlō 3 (10 1944), 136–73;Google Scholar Seitoku, Kinjō, ‘Taiwan jiken (1871–74 nen) ni tsuite no ichi kōsatsu—Ryūkyū shobun no kiten to shite’ (A study of the Japanese Formosan Expedition and its relations to the disposition of Ryūkyū), Okinawa rekishi kenkyū 1 (10 1965), 33–49;Google Scholar Nagamichi, Hanabusa, ‘Sen happiyaku nanaju yo nen Taiwan bansha jiken’ (Japanese Expedition against Formosan aborigines in 1874), Keiō Gijuku Daigaku, Hōgaku kenkyū 24·9/10 (09–10 1951), 51–79;Google Scholar Mantarō, Shozi, trans. by Yü, Hsüeh, ‘I-pa ch'i-ssu nien Jih-pen chü-shih T'ai-wan yü Li Shan-te’ (Charles LeGendre and the Japanese Formosan Expedition of 1874), T'ai-wan yin-hang chi-k'an 10.3 (03 1959), 135–49Google Scholar; and Yen, Sophia, Taiwan in China's Foreign Relations, 1836–1874 (Hamden, Conn., 1965).Google Scholar

12 Ta-tuan, Ch'en, ‘Sino-Ryūkyūan Relations in the 19th century’ (Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 1963), 104.Google Scholar

13 Ibid.

14 Mantarō, Shozi (see note 11), 135–49.Google Scholar

15 Yoshinori, Ino, Taiwan bansei shi (An account of the rule over the Taiwan aborigines) (Taipei, 1973), 593.Google Scholar

16 Jen-hwa, Chow, ‘The Taiwan Incident and the Diplomatic and Consular Missions in Japan,’ Nanyang University Journal VI (1972), 173Google Scholar, quoting Heh-nien, Li to Yamen, , May 30, 1873;Google Scholar Yamen, to Li, , June 6, 1873 (Chinese Foreign Ministry Archives, Chung-Jih hsiu-hao t'iao-yueh).Google Scholar

17 TCK, III: 171–4.

18 T'ai-wan tui-wai kuan-hsi shih-liao (Historical materials on Taiwan's foreign relations), 92–6;Google Scholar NGB, VII, 141, 322.Google Scholar

19 For example, Bull, Earl R., Okinawa or Ryūkyū: the Floating Dragon (Newark, Ohio, 1958), 43.Google Scholar

20 NGB, V, 373–6.Google Scholar

21 NGB:TH. I, 222–3; STK. 185.Google Scholar

22 Kerr, George H., Okinawa: The History of an Island People (Rutland, 1958), 362–3.Google Scholar

23 RS, 9–10; NGB:TH. I, 104.Google Scholar

24 Narahara Kōgorō shokan (Letters of Narahara Kōgorō) handwritten copy, a photostatic copy now deposited in Higaonna Bunko, Naha, Okinawa.

25 JD, De Long to Soyeshima, October 20, 1872. Inclosure no. I of De Long to Fish, November 6, 1872.

26 Ibid., Inclosure no. 2, Soyeshima to De Long, 5th of the loth month of the 5th year of Meiji,

27 Ibid.

28 CD, Williams, W. W. to Fish, May 26, 1874;Google Scholar the record of the conversation can also be found in NGB:TH, I, 105–200.

29 NGB, VII, 5.

30 Ikujiro, Watanabe et al. (comp.), Ōkuma Documents (Tokyo, 1958), I, 25–6, 41.Google Scholar

31 Thomson, Sandra Caruthers, ‘Filibustering to Formosa: General Charles LeGendre and the Japanese,’ Pacific Historical Review XL, 4 (11 1971), 449.Google Scholar

32 For details, see: LeGendre, , Is Aboriginal Formosa a Part of the Chinese Empire? (Shanghai, 1874);Google Scholar Ei-nei, Tei (Cheng Yung-ning), ‘Soejima taishi teki Shin gairyaku’ (Summary of Ambassador Soejima's China mission) (1873), reprinted in Meiji bunka zenshu (Tokyo, 1967) VI, 61–75.Google Scholar

33 JI, Fish to De Long, December 30, 1872.

34 NGB, III, 178–251; TV, 159–266.

35 LeGendre to Commodore David Ammen, May 10, 1873, Memo. Bk. I, Appendix 5, LeGendre Papers, quoted in Thomson (see note 31), 445.

36 TCK, III, 176–7.

37 Kiyoshi, Tabohashi, ‘Meiji gonen no “Maria Rusu” jiken’ (The Maria Luz incident of 1872), Shigaku zasshi 40.2 (February 1929), 230–46; 40.3 (March 1929), 364–75; 40.4 (April 1929), 483–508.Google Scholar

38 McWilliams, Wagner C., ‘East meets East: the Soejima Mission to China, 1873,’ Monumenta Nipponica XXX.3 (Autumn 1975), 267.Google Scholar

39 Tsiang, T. F., ‘Sino-Japanese Diplomatic Relations, 1870–1894,’ The Chinese Social and Political Science Review XVII (1933), 17Google Scholar, states: ‘So far as I know there is only one complete version of the fateful [Yanagihara-Yamen] conversation, namely the one given by Professor Nagao Ariga’ (in ‘Diplomacy’ in Stead, Alfred (ed.), Japan by the Japanese (London, 1904), 101–3Google Scholar ). Writing in 1965, Yen, Sophia in her Taiwan in China's Foreign Relations, 1836–1874, 353, n.35Google Scholar, noted: ‘The Chinese archives heretofore published, do not have the record [of this discussion].’ The fact that the Chinese government, when disputing Soejima's claims in the following year, referred only to their recollection of the discussion but produced no written record to back their contentions suggests that the Tsungli Yamen did not in fact make any record of the interview. See Tsiang, 19 and 26–7, and North China Herald, August 15, 1874.

40 The official record of the discussion is found in Taneomi's, Soejima ‘Shi Shin nikki’ (Diary of my China mission), in NGB, VI, 176–9; Tei Ei-nei (see note 32), 70–1.Google Scholar

41 ‘Shi Shin nikki,’ 178.Google Scholar

42 Taneomi, Soejima, ‘Soejima Haku kelreki gudan,’ (Soejima talks on his experiences), in Tōkō kyōkai kaihō 44 (1898), 30;Google Scholar Ariga, (see note 39), 163.Google Scholar

43 House, Edward E., The Japanese-Expedition to Formosa (Tokyo, 1875), 12–13.Google Scholar

44 ‘Soejima Haku keireki gudan,’ 27, Soejima also noted, on page 30: ‘Some people (in Japan) expressed the view that we should have secured an official note from the Chinese government stating clearly that aboriginal Formosa was beyond the limits of Chinese sovereignty, but this would have been quite difficult, and I decided that a written statement was not absolutely necessary and that a verbal statement would suffice.’ See also Ariga (see note 39), 161.

45 NGB:TH, I, 105.

46 Monbusho, , History of the Empire of Japan, compiled and translated for the Imperial Japanese Commission of the World's Columbian Exposition, Chicago, 1893 (Tokyo, 1893), 401.Google Scholar

47 Okayama-ken no rekishi (History of the Okayama Prefecture) (Okayamashi, 1962), 768.Google Scholar

48 NGB:TH, I, 105; Kokuryukai, (comp.), Seinan kiden (An account of the Satsuma Rebellion) (Tokyo, 1969), I, 1, 612–13;Google Scholar Mikio, Tashiro, Taiwan gunki (A military account of the Japanese Formosan expedition) (1874), I, 6b.Google Scholar

49 NGB, VII, I; NGB:TH, I, 122–24; OTB, V. 343–6; Ōkuma Shigenobu kankei bunsho (The Ōkuma Papers) (Tokyo, 1971), II, 247–50.Google Scholar

50 Sanjō Sanetomi Kō nenfu, 27, 52a–53b.Google Scholar

51 Seinan kiden, I, 1, 612–3.Google Scholar

52 TCK, III, 181–2.Google Scholar

53 CTSM, I, 4–5.Google Scholar

54 Ibid., 6–8.

55 LWCK, II, 91–2.Google Scholar

56 NGB:TH, I, 143; Sanjō Sanetomi Kō nenfu, 28:1a.

57 LWCK, V, 53.Google Scholar

58 CTSM, II, 141.Google Scholar

59 Gandhi, Shanti S., ‘U.S. Diplomatic Relations with China, 1869–1882’ (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, 1954), 308.Google Scholar

60 Ibid.

61 NGB, VII, 316–17.Google Scholar

62 Jen-hwa, Chow (see note 16), 174–5.Google Scholar

63 Now collected in CLCC, II, 277–82.Google Scholar

64 LWCK:PL, 19, 1b–2b.Google Scholar

65 OTB, VI, 237–9.Google Scholar

66 Ibid., VI, 152–61; KK, 237–41.Google Scholar

67 OTB, VI, 237Google Scholar; Inoue Tsuyoski den (Tokyo, 1966–1975), I, 186–8.Google Scholar

68 OTB, VI, 158–60.Google Scholar

69 KK, 243.Google Scholar

70 Ōkubo Toshimichi nikki (Diary of Okubo), last part, 339–42.Google Scholar

71 SP, 56.2, January 13, 1880, Terashima's talk with Parkes.