Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:52:54.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring the Tibetan nation: Anthropometry in 1950s Kalimpong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2021

Miriam Koktvedgaard Zeitzen Open the ORCID record for Miriam Koktvedgaard Zeitzen [Opens in a new window]  and
Trine Brox
Miriam Koktvedgaard Zeitzen*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Trine Brox
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the anthropometric survey of 5,000 Tibetans by the ethnographer HRH Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark in the northeast Indian Himalayan town of Kalimpong in the 1950s, as part of the Third Danish Expedition to Central Asia. In the context of the crisis created by the Chinese incursion into Tibet in 1950, which pushed thousands of Tibetans into India, stationary field anthropometry, rather than a mobile expedition, became Prince Peter's principal entry into Tibetan worlds. This article explores the scientific paradigms underpinning his anthropometric survey at a time when anthropology had seemingly moved on theoretically and ethically, the historical conditions and contingencies of Prince Peter's research, and the survey's representations of Tibetan peoples and places. We argue that, while Prince Peter's understanding was in essence primordialist, linking particular peoples to particular places, in practice he took a more modernist approach to ‘Tibetaness’ as contingent upon historical processes. The article concludes by reflecting on the potential significance of this vast and unique collection of historic anthropometric data for Tibetans today.

Keywords

Prince PeterThird Danish Expedition to Central Asiaethnographyscientific paradigmsTibet
Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 6 , November 2022 , pp. 1715 - 1740
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1949. ‘Den 3. Danske Centralasiatiske Ekspedition: Arbejde og resultater 1948’. Geografisk Tidskrift [online]. https://tidsskrift.dk/geografisktidsskrift/issue/view/4600, [accessed 10 November 2021].Google Scholar
Balslev Jørgensen, Jørgen. 1953. The Eskimo Skeleton: Contributions to the Physical Anthropology of the Aboriginal Greenlanders. København: C. A. Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Bennike, Pia. 1997. ‘Denmark’. In History of Physical Anthropology: An Encyclopedia, edited by Spencer, Frank. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 330–333.Google Scholar
Birket-Smith, Kaj. 1954. ‘Race og Kultur’. In Arv, Race og Kultur, edited by Birket-Smith, Kaj. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, pp. 7–16.Google Scholar
Bishop, Peter. 1989. The Myth of Shangri-La: Tibet, Travel Writing and the Western Creation of Sacred Landscape. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, H. H. Prince Roland. 1886. Note on the Lapps of Finmark, Roland Bonaparte. Paris: Printed by George Chamerot for private circulation only.Google Scholar
Brace, C. Loring. 1997. ‘Race’. In History of Physical Anthropology: An Encyclopedia, edited by Spencer, Frank. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 861–867.Google Scholar
Brøste, Kurt, Jørgensen, Jørgen Balslev, Becker, Carl Johan and Brøndsted, Johannes. 1956. Prehistoric Man in Denmark. A Study in Physical Anthropology. København: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Brox, Trine. 2016. Tibetan Democracy: Governance, Leadership and Conflict in Exile. London: I. B.Tauris.Google Scholar
Brox, Trine and Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard. 2017a. ‘Prince Peter's Seven Years in Kalimpong: Collecting in a Contact Zone’. In Transcultural Encounters in the Himalayan Borderlands, edited by Viehbeck, Markus. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing, pp. 245–272.Google Scholar
Brox, Trine and Zeitzen, Miriam Koktvedgaard. 2017b. ‘When Tibet Came to Prince Peter: Tibetan-Danish Relations through a Stationary Expedition in the 1950s’. The Tibet Journal 42 (2), pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
Cencetti, Elisa. 2015. ‘Pha yul: An Analysis of Grassland Management Policies in Amdo-Qinghai’. Nomadic Peoples 19 (2), pp. 303–323. https://doi.org/10.3197/np.2015.190209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark, Eldon, Knud and Jørgensen, Jørgen Balslev. 1961. ‘The ABO and Rhesus D Groups of 304 Tibetans, tested on Eldoncards’. Man 61, pp. 123–124.Google Scholar
Elliott, Mark. 2015. ‘Sculpting the Network: Recognizing Marguerite Milward's Sculptural Legacy’. In The Anthropology of Expeditions: Travel, Visualities, Afterlives, edited by Bell, Joshua A. and Hasinoff, Erin L.. New York: Bard Graduate Center, pp. 174–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, Isrun. 2007. Tibet in 1938–1939: Photographs from the Ernst Schäfer Expedition to Tibet. Chicago: Serindia Publications.Google Scholar
Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn. 1994. ‘Informed Consent in Anthropological Research: We are Not Exempt’. Human Organization 53 (1), pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalisms. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gilberg, Rolf, Jørgensen, Jørgen Balslev and Laughlin, William S.. 1975. ‘Anthropometrical and Skinfold Thickness Measurements on the Polar Eskimos, Thule District, North Greenland’. Meddelelser om Grønland 203 (1), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1996. The Mismeasure of Man, rev. edn. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Harris, Tina. 2008. ‘Silk Roads and Wool Routes: Contemporary Geographies of Trade between Lhasa and Kalimpong’. India Review 7 (3), pp. 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480802261541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Tina. 2013. Geographical Diversions: Tibetan Trade, Global Transactions. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Herle, Anita, Elliott, Mark and Empson, Rebecca. 2009. Assembling Bodies: Art, Science and Imagination. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology.Google Scholar
Herle, Anita and Rouse, Sandra. 1998. ‘Introduction: Cambridge and the Torres Strait’. In Cambridge and the Torres Strait: Centenary Essays on the 1898 Anthropological Expedition, edited by Herle, Anita and Rouse, Sandra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Himalayan Times. 1952. ‘Influx from Tibet into India’. 13 April, p. 5.Google Scholar
Holck, Per. 2008. ‘Etikk’. In Biologisk antropologi med human osteologi, edited by Lynnerup, Niels, Bennike, Pia and Iregren, Elisabeth. København: Gyldendal, pp. 447–458.Google Scholar
Hopkirk, Peter. 2006. Trespassers on the Roof of the World: The Race for Lhasa. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Hunt, Edward E. 1959. ‘Anthropometry, Genetics and Racial History’. American Anthropologist 61, pp. 64–87.Google Scholar
Jensen, Peter K. A. 2008. ‘Racer’. In Biologisk antropologi med human osteologi, edited by Lynnerup, Niels, Bennike, Pia and Iregren, Elisabeth. København: Gyldendal, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark and Jørgensen, Jørgen Balslev. 1966. ‘Physical Anthropological Observations on 5000 Tibetans from the 3rd Danish Expedition to Central Asia’. In Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark, Lennart Edelberg, Jørgen Balslev Jørgensen, Knud Paludan and Halfdan Shiiger, Anthropological Researches from the 3rd Danish Expedition to Central Asia. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-filosofiske Skrifter Bd. 4, nr. 4. København: Munksgaard, pp. 3–46.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Wolfgang. 2010. Das Dritte Reich und Tibet: Die Heimat des ‘östlichen Hakenkreuzes’ im Blickfeld der Nationalsozialisten, 2nd edn. Ludwigsfelde: Ludwigsfelder Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Klieger, P. Christiaan. 2015. ‘Introduction: Greater Tibet’. In Greater Tibet: An Examination of Borders, Ethnic Boundaries, and Cultural Areas, edited by Klieger, P. Christiaan. United States: Lexington Books, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Koktvedgaard Zeitzen, Miriam. 2008. Polygamy. A Cross-cultural Analysis. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Koktvedgaard Zeitzen, Miriam. 2016. ‘Seksuel jalousi i tibetansk polyandri—Prins Peters redningsantropologi i Kalimpong’. Jordens Folk 1–2, pp. 54–65.Google Scholar
Koktvedgaard Zeitzen, Miriam and Brox, Trine. 2016. ‘Strandet i Kalimpong: Prins Peters Tibet-ekspedition 1950–1957’. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark, pp. 52–65.Google Scholar
Lindee, Susan and Santos, Ricardo Ventura. 2012. ‘The Biological Anthropology of Living Human Populations: World Histories, National Styles and International Networks: An Introduction to Supplement 5’. Current Anthropology 53 (S5), pp. 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1086/663335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipphardt, Veronika. 2012. ‘Isolates and Crosses in Human Population Genetics; or, A Contextualisation of German Race Science’. Current Anthropology 53 (S5), pp. 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1086/662574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, Donald S. 1998. Prisoners of Shangri-La: Tibetan Buddhism and the West. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynnerup, Niels. 1998. The Greenland Norse: A Biological-Anthropological Study. København: The Commission for Scientific Research in Greenland: Danish Polar Center.Google Scholar
Mullaney, Thomas S. 2011. Coming to Terms with the Nation: Ethnic Classification in Modern China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kashag (Cabinet) and National Assembly of Tibet, Tibetan Delegation. 1950. ‘Appeal by His Holiness the Dalai Lama of Tibet to the United Nations’. In Legal Materials on Tibet, 3rd edn [online]. Tibet Justice Center. http://www.tibetjustice.org/materials/un/un2.html, [accessed 10 November 2021].Google Scholar
Nebesky-Wojkowitz, Réne de. 1956. Where the Gods are Mountains: Three Years among the People of the Himalayas. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Nehru, Jawaharlal. 1959. ‘Prime Minister's Statement in the Lok Sabha on 2 April 1959’. http://www.claudearpi.net/maintenance/uploaded_pics/1959LS_Statement_March.pdf, [last accessed 5 May 2016].Google Scholar
Norbu, Dawa. 2008 (1988). ‘Chinese Strategic Thinking on Tibet and the Himalayan Region’. Strategic Analysis 32 (4), pp. 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09700160802214334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pommaret, Francoise. 2003. Tibet: Turning the Wheel of Life. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1951. ‘Third Danish Expedition to Central Asia: Report No. 2 of H.R.H. Prince Peter of Greece, Prince of Denmark, Ll.D., M.A., F.R.A.I., participant of the Expedition, for the year ending January 31st 1951’. Unpublished report. Archives of the Ethnographic Collection of the National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1952a. ‘An Appeal for the Anthropological and Ethnological Exploration of Tibet’. Actes du IVe congres international des sciences anthropologiques et ethnologiques, Vienne, 1–8 septembre, pp. 281–284.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1952b. ‘Expedition Report on the First 2000 Anthropometric Measurements’. The Third Danish Expedition to Central Asia, Kalimpong, 15 June 1952. Unpublished report. Archives of the Ethnographic Collection of the National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1953. ‘Kalimpong som etnografisk arbejdsmark ved Tibet’. Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1954a. ‘The Third Danish Expedition to Central Asia: Its Work in the Himalayas’. Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society XLI, pp. 228–237.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1954b. The Aristocracy of Central Tibet: A Provisional List of the Names of the Noble Houses of U-Tsang. Kalimpong: Tibet Mirror Press.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1957. ‘Attrition of the Teeth Among Tibetans’. Man 57, pp. 177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1958. Chevauchée tibétaines. Paris: Fernand Nathan.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1963. A Study of Polyandry. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1965. ‘The Psychological Testing of the Todas and Tibetans’. In Drives, Affects, Behavior. Vol. 2: Essays in Memory of Marie Bonaparte, edited by Schur, Max. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 418–502.Google Scholar
Prince Peter of Greece and Denmark. 1979. ‘The Chinese Colonisation of Tibet’. The Tibet Society Bulletin 13 (June), pp. 22–31.Google Scholar
Raghavan, Maanasa, DeGiorgio, Michael, Albrechtsen, Anders, Moltke, Ida, Skoglund, Pontus, Korneliussen, Thorfinn S., Grønnow, Bjarne et al. 2014. ‘The Genetic Prehistory of the New World Arctic’. Science 345 (6200). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schafft, Gretchen. 2004. From Racism to Genocide: Anthropology in the Third Reich. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Shakya, Tsering. 1993. ‘Whither the Tsampa Eaters?’ Himal (Sept.–Oct.), pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Shakya, Tsering. 1994. ‘Introduction: The Development of Modern Tibetan Studies’. In Resistance and Reform in Tibet, edited by Barnett, Robert and Akiner, Shirin. London: Hurst and Company, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Shakya, Tsering. 1999. The Dragon in the Land of Snows: A History of Modern Tibet. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony. 1988. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer, Frank. 1997. ‘Anthropometry’. In History of Physical Anthropology: An Encyclopedia, edited by Spencer, Frank. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 80–90.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Jr. 1988. ‘Bones, Bodies, Behavior’. In Bones, Bodies, Behavior: Essays on Biological Anthropology, edited by Stocking, George. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
Stoddard, Heather. 1994. ‘Tibetan Publications and National Identity’. In Resistance and Reform in Tibet, edited by Barnett, Robert and Akiner, Shirin. London: Hurst and Company, pp. 121–156.Google Scholar
Ulijaszek, Stanley and Komlos, John. 2010. ‘From a History of Anthropometry to Anthropometric History’. In Human Variation: From the Laboratory to the Field, edited by Nicholas Mascie-Taylor, C. G., Yasukouchi, Akira and Ulijaszek, Stanley. Boca Raton, London and New York: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viehbeck, Markus (ed.). 2017. Transcultural Encounters in the Himalayan Borderlands: Kalimpong as a ‘Contact Zone’. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing.Google Scholar
Washburn, Sherwood. 1951. ‘The New Physical Anthropology’. Transactions of the New York Academy of Science 13, pp. 298–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wylie, Turrel. 1959. ‘A Standard System of Tibetan Transcription’. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 22, pp. 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Emily T. 2002. ‘Will the Real Tibetan Please Stand Up! Identity Politics in the Tibetan Diaspora’. In Tibet, Self, and the Tibetan Diaspora: Voices of Difference, edited by Klieger, Christiaan P.. Leiden: Brill, pp. 229–254.Google Scholar