Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:57:22.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wilhelmgümbelite, [ZnFe2+Fe33+(PO4)3(OH)4(H2O)5]·2H2O, a new schoonerite-related mineral from the Hagendorf Süd pegmatite, Bavaria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

I. E. Grey*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Mineral Resources, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria 3169, Australia
E. Keck
Affiliation:
Algunderweg 3, D-92694 Etzenricht, Germany
A. R. Kampf
Affiliation:
Mineral Sciences Dept., Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
C. M. Macrae
Affiliation:
CSIRO Mineral Resources, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria 3169, Australia
A. M. Glenn
Affiliation:
CSIRO Mineral Resources, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria 3169, Australia
J. R. Price
Affiliation:
Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
*

Abstract

Wilhelmgümbelite, ideally [ZnFe2+Fe33+(PO4)3(OH)4(H2O)5]·2H2O, is a new secondary phosphate mineral related closely to schoonerite, [ZnMnFe22+Fe3+(PO4)3(OH)2(H2O)7]·2H2O, from oxidized zones of the Hagendorf-Süd pegmatite, Hagendorf, Oberpfalz, Bavaria, Germany. Wilhelmgümbelite occurs as radiating sprays of needle-like rectangular laths, up to 0.2 mm long and with colour varying from light yellow brown to orange red. Cleavage is perfect parallel to {010}. The mineral is associated closely with an oxidized pseudomorph of phosphophyllite, recently named steinmetzite. Other associated minerals are albite, apatite, chalcophanite, jahnsite, mitridatite, muscovite and quartz. The calculated density of wilhelmgümbelite is 2.82 g cm–3. It is optically biaxial (+) with α = 1.560(2), β = 1.669(2), γ = 1.718(2), 2V(meas) = 63(1)° and 2V(calc.) = 65°. Dispersion is weak with r > v, orientation X = b, Y = c, Z = a. Pleochroism is weak, with coloursZ = orange brown, Y = yellow brown, X = light yellow brown, Z >> Y > X. Electron microprobe analyses (average of seven analyses, seven crystals) with H2O and FeO/Fe2O3 calculated on structural grounds, gave FeO 5.8, Fe2O3 25.0, MnO 2.6, ZnO 16.4, P2O5 28.7, H2O 23.4, total 101.9 wt.%. The empirical formula, scaled to 3 P and OH adjusted for charge balance is Zn1.50Mn0.272+Fe0.602+Fe2.333+(PO4)3·(OH)2.73(H2O)8.27. The structural formula is [Zn(Mn0.27Fe0.733+)∑1.0(Zn0.25Fe0.152+Fe0.603+)∑1.0(Zn0.25Fe0.452+)∑0.7Fe3+(PO4)3(OH,H2O)9]·2H2O.Wilhelmgümbelite has orthorhombic symmetry, Pmab, Z = 4, with the unit-cell parameters of a = 10.987(7) Å, b = 25.378(13) Å, c = 6.387(6) Å and V = 1781(2) Å3. The strongest lines in the powder X-ray diffraction pattern are [dobs in Å(Iobs) (hkl)] 12.65 (100) (020); 8.339 (5) (120); 6.421 (14) (001); 6.228 (8) (011); 4.223 (30) (120) and 2.111 (7) (0 12 0). Wilhelmgümbelite is an oxidized form of schoonerite, with the Mn2+ replaced principally by Fe3+. Its structure differs from that of schoonerite in having the Zn partitioned between two different sites, one five-coordinated as in schoonerite and the other tetrahedrally coordinated. Wilhelmgümbelite also differs structurally from schoonerite in having partial occupation of one of the Fe sites, which appears to be correlated with the Zn partitioning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayliss, P. (2000) Glossary of Obsolete Mineral Names. Mineralogical Record. Tucson, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
Grey, I.E., Keck, E., Mumme, W.G., Pring, A. and MacRae, CM. (2015a) Flurlite, Zn3Mn2+Fe3+(PO4)3(OH)2-9H2O, a new mineral from the Hagendorf Siid pegmatite, Bavaria, with a schoonerite-related structure. Mineralogical Magazine, 79, 11751184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, I.E., Keck, E., Kampf, A.R., Mumme, W.G., MacRae, CM., Gable, R.W., Glenn, A.M. and Davidson, C.J. (20156) Steinmetzite, IMA 2015-081. CNMNC Newsletter No. 28, December 2015, page 1863. Mineralogical Magazine, 19, 18591864.Google Scholar
Gunter, M.E., Bandli, B.R., Bloss, F.D., Evans, S.H., Su, S.C and Weaver, R. (2004) Results from a McCrone spindle stage short course, a new version of EXCALIBR, and how to build a spindle stage. The Microscope, 52, 2339.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C (1988) Sigloite: The oxidation mechanism in [Mf+(PO4)2(OH)2(H2O)2]2∼ structures. Mineralogy and Petrology, 38, 201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampf, A.R. (1977) Schoonerite: its atomic arrangement. American Mineralogist, 62, 250255.Google Scholar
Laugier, J. andBochu, B. (2000) LMGP-Program for the interpretation of X-ray experiments.TNPG/Laboratoire des Materiaux et du Genie Physique. St Martin d'Heres, France.Google Scholar
Mandarino, J.A. (1981) The Gladstone-Dale relationship: Part IV The compatibility concept and its application. The Canadian Mineralogist, 19, 441450.Google Scholar
Moore, P.B. and Kampf, A.R. (1977) Schoonerite, a new zinc-manganese-iron phosphate mineral. American Mineralogist, 62, 246249.Google Scholar
Petricek, V, Dusek, M. and Palatinus, L. (2014) Crystallographic Computing System JANA2006: General features. Zeitschrifi fur Kristallographie, 229, 345352.Google Scholar