Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:48:43.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triple-chain pyriboles in Lewisian ultramafic rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

G. T. R. Droop
G. T. R. Droop*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The triple-chain pyriboles jimthompsonite, clinojimthompsonite, and probably chesterite and its monoclinic polytype occur in Lewisian amphibolite-facies ultramafic rocks near Achmelvich, N.W. Scotland. These minerals are intergrown with one another and with amphiboles in prismatic porphyroblasts up to 3 cm long, which are associated with chlorite, carbonate, magnetite and, in some cases, talc. Rocks containing triple-chain silicates have been found at three localities, in each case outcropping in a layer < 1.5 m thick. Clinojimthompsonite is the most abundant triple-chain silicate and generally forms euhedral wedge-shaped overgrowths, measuring up to 1 mm in the b-axis direction, on the {010} faces of actinolite cores. The mineral assemblages are probably of Inverian age.

The identification of the triple-chain phases is based mainly on cleavage angle, extinction angle, backscattered electron intensity and, in the case of clinojimthompsonite, on X-ray diffraction data. Microprobe analyses support the identifications. The triple-chain silicates have compositions lying in the system MgO-FeO-SiO2-H2O, with only trace amounts of other components.

The cell dimensions of the coarsest clinojimthompsonite are: a = 9.862 ± 0.002 Å, b = 27.184 ± 0.020 Å, c = 5.298 ± 0.004 Å, β = 109.61° ± 0.14° V = 1337.9 ± 1.8 Å3, and its optical properties are as follows: α = 1.600 β = 1.619 γ = 1.628 (all ± 0.001) and optic axial plane = (010). The 2Vα of clinojimthompsonite = 67 ±2°.

Back-scattered electron microscopy reveals that although substantial volumes of single-phase clinojimthompsonite are common, (010) intergrowths of Mg,Fe-amphiboles, jimthompsonite polytypes and chesterite polytypes occur locally on scales down to 0.1 µm and probably smaller, indicating considerable chain-width disorder.

The triple-chain pyriboles are not pseudomorphous after amphibole and probably grew during prograde Inverian metamorphism. Chemographic constraints suggest that they could have formed from forsterite-bearing assemblages, possibly as the result of infiltration of CO2-rich fluid. Thermodynamic calculations for associated high-variance ultramafic rocks place an upper limit of c. 600–700°C on the temperature of metamorphism.

The large number of chemically similar pyriboles and their disposition within compound prisms suggests that crystallization was kinetically controlled. A simple ‘template’ model is propesed to explain the observed patterns, in which the identity of the Mg,Fe-pyribole nucleating at any point on a preexisting actinolite or Mg,Fe-pyribole substrate is controlled by silicate-chain width and/or symmetry (ortho vs. clino), depending on the orientation of the substrate crystal face.

Keywords

pyribolestriple-chain silicatesclinojimthompsonitejimthompsoniteBSEMnucleation kinetics
Type
Mineralogy
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 58 , Issue 390 , March 1994 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, R. N. and Burnham, C. W. (1991) Energy calculations bearing on biopyriboles. Amer. MineraL, 76, 728–32.Google Scholar
Alan, J. H., Cho, M., Jenkins, D. M. and Buseck, P. R. (1991) Structural defects in synthetic tremolitic amphiboles. Amer. MineraL, 76, 1811–23.Google Scholar
Akai, J. (1982) Polymerization process of biopyribole in metasomatism at the Atakani ore deposit, Japan. Contrib. Mineral PetroL, 80, 117–31.Google Scholar
Cartwright, I. and Barnicoat, A. C. (1986) The generation of silica-undersaturated melts and corundum-bearing restites by crustal anatexis: petrogrenetic modelling based on an example from the Lewisian of NW Scotland. J. Metamorph. Geol., 4, 79–100.Google Scholar
Cartwright, I. and Barnicoat, A. C. (1987) Perology of Scourian supracrustal rocks and orthogneisses from Stoer N.W. Scotland: implications for the geological evolution of the Lewisian Complex. In Evolution of the Lewisian and comparable Precambrian high grade terrains (Park, R. G. and Tarney, J., eds.. Geol. Soc. Special PubL, 27, 93–107.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. J. (1979) 2390 Myr Rb-Sr whole-rock age for the Scourie Dykes of north-west Scotland. Nature, 277, 642–3.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. J. and Moorbath, S. (1977) Lead isotope measurements from the oldest recognised Lewisian gneisses of north-west Scotland. Nature, 268, 41–2.Google Scholar
Cressey, B. A., Whittaker, E. J., and Hutchison, J. L. (1980) Electron microscopy of amphiboles along [001]. Abstracts, L M.A. 12th General Meeting, Orleans, p. 94 (abstract).Google Scholar
Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A., and Zussman, J. (1992) Introduction to the rock-forming minerals. (Second Edition) Longman, London.Google Scholar
Dorling, M. and Zussman, J. (1984) Zincian actinolite asbestos. MineraL Pol., 15, 11–20.Google Scholar
Drits, V. A., Goncharov, Y. I., Aleksandrova, V. A., Khadzhi, V. E., and Dmitrik, A. L. (1974) A new type of strip silicate. Kristallografiya, 19, 1186–93.Google Scholar
Evans, C. R. (1965) Geochronology of the Lewisian basement near Lochinver, Sutherland. Nature, 207, 54–6.Google Scholar
Evans, C. R. and Lambert, R. St. J. (1974) The Lewisian of Lochinver, Sutherland; the type area for the Inverian metamorphism. J. Geol. Soc., 130, 125–50.Google Scholar
Evans, C. R. and Tarney, J. (1964) Isotopic ages of Assynt dykes. Nature, 205, 638–41.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P. J., Evensen, N. M., O'Nions, R. K., and Tarney, J. (1979) Sm-Nd systematics of Lewisian gneisses: implications for the origin of granulites. Nature, 277, 25–8.Google Scholar
Holland, T. J. B. and Powell, R. (1990) An enlarged and updated internally consistent thermodynamic dataset with uncertainties and correlations: the system K20-Na20-CaO-MgO-MnO-FeO-Fe203-AI203-TiO2-SiO2-C-Hz-O2. J. Metamorph. GeoL, 8, 89–124.Google Scholar
Humphries, F. J. and Cliff, R. A. (1982) Sm-Nd dating and cooling history of Scourian ganulites, Sutherland. Nature, 295, 515–7.Google Scholar
Kerrick, D. M. (1974) Review of metamorphic mixed-volatile (H20-CO2) equilibria. Amer. Mineral., 59, 729–62.Google Scholar
Livi, K. J. T. and Veblen, D. R. (1992) An analytical electron microscopy study of pyroxene-to-pyrox-enoid reactions. Amer. Mineral., 77, 380–90.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. (1987) Atomic number and crystal-lographic contrast images with the SEM: a review of backscattered electron techniques. Mineral. Mag., 51, 3–19.Google Scholar
Moorbath, S., Powell, J. L. and Taylor, P. N. (1975) Isotopic evidence for the age and origin of the ‘grey gneiss’ complex of the southern Outer Hebrides, Scotland. J. Geol. Soc. London, 131, 213–22.Google Scholar
Nakajima, Y. and Ribbe, P. H. (1980) Alteration of pyroxenes from Hokkaido, Japan, to amphiboles, clays and other biopyriboles. Neues Jahrb. Mineral., Mh., 258-68.Google Scholar
Nissen, H.-U., Wessicken, R., Woensdregt, C. F. and Pfeifer, H. R. (1979) Disordered intermediates between jimthompsonite and anthophyllite from the Swiss Alps. In Electron microscopy and analysis 1979 (Mulvey, T., ed.. Institute of Physics, Conference Series, 52, 99–100.Google Scholar
Park, R. G. and Tarney, J. (1987) The Lewisian Complex. In Evolution of the Lewisian and comparable Precambrian high grade terrains (Park, R.G. and Tarney, J., eds.. Geol. Soc. Special Publ., 27, 13–25.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, R. T. and Bowes, D. R. (1968) Zircon U-Pb ages of granulites from the central region of the Lewisian, north-west Scotland. Geol. Mag., 109, 247–58.Google Scholar
Porter, D. A. and Easterling, K. E. (1981) Phase transformations in metals and alloys. Van Nostrand Reinhold CLIK), Wokingham.Google Scholar
Ross, M., Papike, J. J. and Shaw, K. W. (1969) Exsolution textures in amphiboles as indicators of subsolidus thermal histories. Mineral Soc. Am. Special Paper, 2, 275–99.Google Scholar
Schumacher, J. C. and Czank, M. (1987) Mineralogy of triple-and double-chain pyriboles from Orij/irvi, southwest Finland. Amer. Mineral., 72, 345–52.Google Scholar
Sheraton, J. W., Tarney, J., Wheatley, T. J. and Wright, A. E. (1973) The structural history of the Assynt district. In The early Precambrian of Scotland and related rocks of Greenland (Park, R. G. and Tarney, J., eds,) Keele, 9-12.Google Scholar
Sills, J. D. (1982) The retrogression of ultramafic granulites from the Scourian of NW Scotland. Mineral. Mag., 46, 55–61.Google Scholar
Sills, J. D. (1983) Mineralogical changes occurring during the retrogression of Archaean gneisses from the Lewisian complex of NW Scotland. Lithos, 16, 113–24.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. and Watson, J. (1951) The pre-Torridonian metamorphic history of the Loch Torridon and Scourie areas in the north-west Highlands, and its bearing on the chronological history of the Lewisian. Q. J. GeoL Soc. London, 106, 241–308.Google Scholar
Tarney, J. (1978) Achmelvich Bay, Assynt (Lewisian). In The Lewisian and Torridonian rocks of northwest Scotland (Barber, A. J., Beach, A., Park, R. G., Tarney, J. and Stewart, A. D. eds.. Geol. Assoc. Guide, 21, 35–50.Google Scholar
Tateyama, H., Shimoda, S., and Sudo, T. (1978) Synthesis and crystal structure of a triple-chain silicate, Na2Mg4Si6OI6(OH)E. Contrib. Mineral. PetroL, 66, 149–56.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (1970) Geometrical possibilities for amphibole structures: model biopyriboles. Amer. Mineral., 55, 292–3.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (1978) Biopyriboles and poly-somatic series. Amer. MineraL, 63, 239–49.Google Scholar
Treloar, P. J. and Putnis, A. (1982) Chemistry and microstructure of orthoamphiboles from cordierite-amphibole rocks at Outokumpu, North Karelia, Finland. Mineral. Mag., 45, 55–62.Google Scholar
Veblen, D. R. and Burnham, C. W. (1975) Triple-chain biopyriboles: newly discovered intermediate products of the retrograde anthophyllite-talc transformation. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union (EOS), 56, 1076 (abstract).Google Scholar
Veblen, D. R. and Burnham, C. W. (1976) Biopyriboles from Chester, Vermont: the first mixed-chain sihcates. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstracts with Programs, 8, 1153 (abstract).Google Scholar
Veblen, D. R. and Burnham, C. W. (1978a) New biopyriboles from Chester, Vermont: I Descriptive mineralogy. Amer. Mineral., 63, 1000-9.Google Scholar
Veblen, D. R. and Burnham, C. W. (1978b) New biopyriboles from Chester, Vermont: II The crystal structures of jimthompsonite, clino-jimthompsonite and chesterite, and the amphi-bole-mica reaction. Amer. Mineral., 63, 1053-73.Google Scholar
Veblen, D. R. and Buseck, P. R. (1979) Chain width order and disorder in biopyriboles. Amer. Mineral., 64, 687–700.Google Scholar
Veblen, D. R. and Busr P. R. (1980) Microstructures and reaction mechanisms in biopyriboles. Amer. Mineral., 65, 599–623.Google Scholar
Veblen, D. R. and Buseck, P. R. (1981) Hydrous pyriboles and sheet silicates in pyroxenes and uralites: intergrowth microstructures and reaction mechanisms. Amer. Mineral., 66, 1107–34.Google Scholar
Welch, M. D., Rocha, J., and Klinowski, J. (1992) Characterisation of polysomatism in biopyriboles: double-/triple-chain lamellar intergrowths. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 18, 460–8.Google Scholar
Whittaker, E. J., Cressey, B. A. and Hutchison, J. L. (1981) Terminations of multiple chain lamellae in grunerite asbestos. Mineral. Mag., 44, 27–35.Google Scholar
Worden, R. H., Droop, G. T. R. and Champness, P. E. (1992) The influence of crystallography and kinetics on phengite breakdown reactions in a low-pressure metamorphic aureole. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 110, 329–45.Google Scholar
Yau, Y-C. and Peacor, D. R. (1985) Wide-chain Ca-pyribole and actinolite intergrowths in primary euhedral crystals from the Salton Sea geothermal field, California. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union (EOS), 66, 373 (abstract).Google Scholar