Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:17:22.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rubidium-strontium age studies and geochemistry of acid veins in the Freetown complex, Sierra Leone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R. D. Beckinsale ,
J. F. W. Bowles ,
R. J. Pankhurst  and
M. K. Wells
R. D. Beckinsale
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, Gray's Inn Road, London WIX 8NG
J. F. W. Bowles
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, Gray's Inn Road, London WIX 8NG
R. J. Pankhurst
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey
M. K. Wells
Affiliation:
University College, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The stratigraphical limits on the age of the Freetown intrusion, Sierra Leone, are very wide, yet the intrusion has not previously been accurately dated by isotopic methods, despite a number of attempts. Rubidium-strontium dating of acid veins contemporaneous with the early stages of the prolonged cooling history of the intrusion provides an age of 193 ± 3 Ma. The veins consist of quartz and orthoclase with relict minerals, principally plagioclase, from thehost gabbro. Electron-microprobe analysis of the altered minerals of the veins, and the petrography of the vein and adjacent host gabbro clearly demonstrate that the veins were formed from a granitic fraction, differentiated in situ from the surrounding solid gabbro with the assistance of a hydrous fluid phase within the incipient vein. This assertion is supported by the identical, low value of the initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio (0·70389) obtained from both the acid and basic rocks, and the technique described here may be useful in dating other, similar, intrusions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 41 , Issue 320 , December 1977 , pp. 501 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews-Jones, (D. A.), 1968. Petrogenesis and Geochemistry of rocks of the Kenema district, Sierra Leone. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Bowles, (J. F. W.), 1975. Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci. No. 75/9 [M.A. 76-82].Google Scholar
Bowles, (J. F. W.), 1976. Mineral. Mag. 40, 703–14 [M.A. 76-3633].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, (J. F. W.), 1977. Ibid. 41, 103–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briden, (J. C), Henthorn, (D. I.), and Rex, (D. C), 1971. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 12, 385–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, (G. B.), Gromme, (C. S.), and White, (R. W.), 1975. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 86, 399–411.Google Scholar
Elliot, (D.), 1972. Ibid. 84, 2645-64.Google Scholar
Foland, (K. A.) and Henderson, (C. M. B.), 1975. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 29, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junner, (N. R.) and Harwood, (H. F.), 1930. Rep. 15th Sess. Internat. geol. Cong., S. Afr., 1929, No. 43, 417–33.Google Scholar
Kerrich, (R.), Beckinsale, (R. D.), and Durham, (J. J.), 1977. Tectonophysics, 38, 241–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerrich, (R.), Beckinsale, (R. D.), and Shackleton, (N. J.). Unpublished MS.Google Scholar
McElhinny, (M. W.) and Burek, (P. J.), 1971. Nature, 232, 98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, (P. K.), Frost, (M. T.), and Reed, (S. J. B.), 1969. Natl. Phys. Lab. (I.M.S.), Rep. 2.Google Scholar
Pankhurst, (R. J.) and O'Nions, (R. K.), 1973. Chem. Geol. 12, 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snelling, (N. J.), 1966. Inst. Geol. Sci. Ann. Rep. for 1965. II, 44–57.Google Scholar
Turner, (F. J.), 1968. Metamorphic Petrology, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Wells, (M. K.), 1962. Geol. Sun. Dept. Sierra Leone, Short Paper, No. 9. (Bull. Overseas Geol. Min. Res., Suppl. No. 4) [M.A. 16-305].Google Scholar
Williamson, (J. H.), 1968. Canad. Journ. Phys. 46, 1845-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar