Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:06:29.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling of the relations between reaction enthalpy and the buffering of reaction progress in metamorphism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

John Ridley
John Ridley*
Affiliation:
Institut für Mineralogie und Petrographie, ETH-Zentrum, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A proportion of the heat added to a body of rock during prograde metamorphism will be absorbed in the chemical work of metamorphic recrystallization. When and where heat is so absorbed will affect the exact thermal histories of the rocks, and hence the metamorphic textures. This paper reports the results of modelling of the inter-relations between reaction progress and thermal histories in a rock column. The results suggest that volumes of rock undergoing reaction at any moment act as heat sinks and absorb heat from the surrounding rock, that reaction generally takes place close to the temperature at which nucleation took place, and that steady heating of a rock pile can give rise to a reaction history in which spurts of reaction are separated by ‘quiet’, non-reactive intervals.

Keywords

prograde metamorphismkineticsheat flowreaction enthalpy
Type
Rates of Metamorphic Reactions
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 50 , Issue 357 , September 1986 , pp. 375 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Geology, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe.

References

Atherton, M.P. (1964) Am. Mineral. 49, 1331-49.Google Scholar
Atherton, M.P. (1968) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 18, 347-71.Google Scholar
Bickle, M.J., Hawkesworth, C.J., England, P.C. and Athey, D.R. (1975) Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 26, 13-28.Google Scholar
Cahn, J.W. (1956) Acta Metallurgie. 4, 449-59..Google Scholar
Carmichael, D.M. (1979) Geol. Soc. Am. abstract with Prog. 11, 398.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.A., and Putnis, A. (1985) In Metamorphic Reactions: Kinetics, Textures and Deformatio. Advances in Physical Geochemistry, 4, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1-26.Google Scholar
Christian, J.W. (1975) The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys(2nd edn.) Part 1. Equilibrium and General Kinetic Theor. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
England, P.C. and Richardson, S.W. (1977) J. geol. Soc. London. 134, 201-14.Google Scholar
Ferry, J.M. (1983) Am. J. Sci.283A, 201-32.Google Scholar
Fisher, G.W. (1978) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 42, 1035-50.Google Scholar
Guidotti, C.V. (1974) Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 85, 475-90.Google Scholar
Hollister, L.S. (1977) Can. Mineral. 15, 217-29.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, R.J., Klein, L., Uhlmann, D.R., and Hays, J.F. (1979) J. Geophys. Res. 84, 3671-6.Google Scholar
McLean, D. (1965) In Controls of Metamorphis. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 103-18.Google Scholar
Matthews, A., and Schliestedt, M. (1984) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 88, 150-63.Google Scholar
Oxburgh, E.R., and Turcotte, D.L. (1974) Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt. 54, 641-62.Google Scholar
Rice, J.M., and Ferry, J.M. (1982) In Characterization of Metamorphism through Mineral Equilibri. Reviews in Mineralogy no. 10, Miner Soc. Am. Spec. Publications.Google Scholar
Ridley, J. (1985) In Metamorphic Reactions: Kinetics, Textures and Deformatio. Advances in Physical Geochemistry, 4. Springer-Verlag, New York, 80–97.Google Scholar
Walther, J.V. and Wood, B.J. (1984) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 88, 246-59.Google Scholar