Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T08:16:58.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mineralogy and paragenesis of a fluorspar flat at Masson Hill, Matlock, Derbyshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Robert A. Ixer
Robert A. Ixer*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Aston in Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Investigation of the mineralogy and paragenesis of the fluorspar flat at Masson Hill, Matlock, Derbyshire, shows the mineralization to be a combination of void infilling and metasomatic replacement. The main paragenesis is of the non-sulphides, fluorite, baryte, and calcite accompanied by a sequence of sulphides, bravoite, pyrite, marcasite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and galena. A wide range of secondary minerals occur in the oxidation zone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 39 , Issue 307 , September 1974 , pp. 811 - 815
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, (F. A.), 1940. Min. Mag., 25, 6o9-14.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, (R. S. W.) and Ryback, (G.), 1963. Ibid. 33, 441-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, (K. C.), 1952. Geological Survey on the Mineral Resources of Great Britain, 4. Fluorspar, 97&101. London (H.M.S.O.).Google Scholar
Ford, (R. D.), 1967. Some Mineral Deposits in the Carboniferous Limestone of Derbyshire, 53-75, in Geological excursions in the Sheffield Region. University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Ford, (R. D.) 1969. The Stratiform Ore Deposits of Derbyshire, 73-96, in Sedimentary Ores Ancient and Modern. University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Ford, (R. D.) and Ineson, (P. R.), 1971. Trans. Inst. Min. Met., 80, B186-210.Google Scholar
Ford, (R. D.) and Sarjeant, (W. A. S.), 1964. Proc. York. Geol. Soc., 34, 371–86.Google Scholar
Ineson, (P. R.) and Al-Kufaishi, (F. A. M.), 1970. Mercian Geol., 3, 337–51.Google Scholar
Ixer, (R. A.), 1972. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Mueller, (G.), 1954a. Mining Mag., 90, 148–54 and 208-17.Google Scholar
Mueller, (G.) 1954b. XIX Int. Geol. Congr. Alger. Fasc., 15, 532–9.Google Scholar
Smith, (E. G.), Rhys (G. H.), and Eden, (R. A.), 1967. Geology of the Country around Chesterfield, Matlock and Mansfield. Mere. Geol. Surv. Gt. Britain. Google Scholar
Vaoghan, (O. J.), 1969. Amer. Min., 54, 1075–83.Google Scholar