Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:12:34.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineral Analysis and Analysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

M. H. Hey*
Affiliation:
British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, S.W. 7

Summary

The history of the chemical analysis of minerals is shortly reviewed. Following rapid developments between 1770 and 1810, few important changes took place for close on 130 years; new procedures led to simpler and more convenient separations but not, on the whole, to greater accuracy. The older analyses are, in general, neither worse nor better than modern ones, and analyses can only be assessed on internal evidence, if available, or on the reputation of the analyst.

The development of microchemical and colorimetric techniques in the last 40 years has resulted in a great reduction in the amount of material required for a mineral analysis; 5 to 20 mg is usually sufficient, and in favourable cases a complete analysis may be possible on less than I mg. Some modern instrumental methods are considered, and it is concluded that they cannot wholly replace the classical wet-chemical methods in their modern developments.

W. F. Hillebrand (1894) deplored the tendency of some petrologists to demand large numbers of very incomplete rock analyses, and his remarks are considered apposite today.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1768 [Lavoisier, (A. L.), Analyse du Gypse Mém. sav. Étrang. 5].Google Scholar
1774 Bergman, (T.), De mineris ferri albis, Opuscula 2 228 (collected works, 1784).Google Scholar
1777 Bergman, (T.) De terra gemmarum, ibid. 96.Google Scholar
1780 Bergman, (T.) De praecipitatis metallicis, ibid. 349.Google Scholar
1782 Bergman, (T.) De terra asbestina, ibid. 4, 160.Google Scholar
1787 Kirwan, (R.), Elements of Mineralogy London.Google Scholar
1787 Klaproth, (M. H.), Schr. GeselL naturf. Freunde Berlin, 7, 141; transl. by J. G. Groschke as Observations relative to the mineralogical and chemical history of the fossils of CornwalU 1787.Google Scholar
1792 Hochheimer, (C. F. A.), Chemische Mineralogie Leipzig, 1, iv.Google Scholar
1792 [Richter, (J. B.), Anfangsgriinde der Stochyometrie Breslau]; cited by Szabadvary, 1966.Google Scholar
1792-1815 Klaproth, (M. H.), Beitrage zur chemischen Kenntniss der Mineralkorper 1-6, Posen and Berlin; 1 and 2 translated as Analytical Essays towards promoting the Chemical Knowledge of Mineral Substances London, 1801.Google Scholar
1799 Proust, (J. L.), (= An vme), Ann. Chim. 32, 31.Google Scholar
1801 [Lampadixjs, (W. A.), Handbuch zur chemischen Analyse der Mineralkorper] ; cited by Szabadvary, 1966.Google Scholar
1803 [Berthollet, (C. L.), Essai de statique chimique Paris]; cited by Szabadvary, 1966.Google Scholar
1804 Accum, (F. C.)5 A practical essay on the analysis of minerals London.Google Scholar
1805 Dalton, (J.), Mem. Manchester Lit. Phil. Soc. 1, 244; Alembic Club Reprints no. 2 (1948).Google Scholar
1807 Aikin, (A.) and Aikin, (C. R.), Diet. Chem. Min. London, 2, 408.Google Scholar
1807 Thomson, (T.), A System of Chemistry', Alembic Club Reprints no. 2 (1948).Google Scholar
1808 Accum, (F. C.), A manual of analytical mineralogy 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
1808 Dalton, (J.), A New System of Philosophy, Alembic Club Reprints no. 2 (1948).Google Scholar
1808 Thomson, (T.), Phil. Trans. 98, 63; Alembic Club Reprints no. 2 (1948).Google Scholar
1808 Wollaston, (W. H.), Ibid. 96; ibid.Google Scholar
1811 Hisinger, (W.), [Afhi Fys. Kemi Min. 3, 152]; Phil. Mag. 40, 258 (1812).Google Scholar
1811 Gay-Lussac, (J. L.), Ann. Chim. 78, 86; 80, 205.Google Scholar
1816 Fuchs, (J. N.), Journ. Chem. Phys. (Schweigger) 18, 288.Google Scholar
1818 Fuchs, (J. N.) Ibid. 24, 121.Google Scholar
1819 Berzelius, (J. J.), Ann. Chim. Phys. ser. 2, 12, 12.Google Scholar
1821 [Pfaff, (C. H.), Handbuch der analytischen Chemie Altonah]; cited by Szabadvary, 1966.Google Scholar
1826 Guillemin, (J.), Ann. Mines ser. 1, 12, 390.Google Scholar
1829 Rose, (H.), Handbuch der analytischen Chemie Berlin.Google Scholar
1833 Otto, (F. J.), Journ. Chem. Phys. Schweigger) 67, 148.Google Scholar
1841 [Berzelius, (J. J.), Lehrbuch der Chemie 10, Dresden and Leipzig]; cited by Szabadváry, 1966.Google Scholar
1841 [Fresenius, (C. R.), Anleitung zur qualitativen chemischen Analyse]; cited by Szabadváry, 1966.Google Scholar
1846 [Berzelius, (J. J.) Anleitung zur quantativen Analyse] cited by Szabadváry, 1966.Google Scholar
1846 Margueritte, (F.), Ann. chim. phys. 18, 244.Google Scholar
1846 Plattner, (C. F.), Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff) 69, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1850 Penny, (F.), [Chem. Gazette 8, 330]; Brit. Assoc. Arm. Rept. 1851 (for 1850), pt. 2, 58.Google Scholar
1851 Reynoso, (A.), Compt. Rend. Acad. ScL Paris 33, 385.Google Scholar
1851 Rose, (H.), Ausfuhrliches Handbuch der analytischen Chemie 2, Braunschweig.Google Scholar
1851 Schabus, (J.), Sitzungsber. kais. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Mat.-nat. CL 6, 396.Google Scholar
1851 Sonnenschein, (F. L.), Joum. prakt. Chem. (Erdmann) 53, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1853 Fresenius, (C. R.), Anleitung zur quaniitativen Analyse 3rd edn.Google Scholar
1853 Smith, (J. Lawrence), Amer. Joum. Sci. and Artsy ser. 2, 15, 234; 16, 53.Google Scholar
1860 Bunsen, (R. W.) and Kirchhoff, (G. R.), Monatsber. Akad. Berlin 221.Google Scholar
1860 Mitscherlich, (A.), Joum. prakt. Chem. 81, 116.Google Scholar
1861 Lange, (Th.), Ibid. 82, 129.Google Scholar
1864 Brush, (G. J.)s Amer. Joum. Sci. and Arts ser. 2, 38, 115.Google Scholar
1864 Gibbs, (W.), Zeits. anal. Chem. 3, 334.Google Scholar
1864 Pisani, (F.), Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 58, 714.Google Scholar
1865 [Luckow, (C.), Dinglers polytechn. Joum. 177, 43, 296]; cited by Szabadvdry, 1966.Google Scholar
1867 Cooke, (J. P.), Amer. Joum. Sci. and Arts ser. 2, 44, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1871 Smith, (J. Lawrence), Ibid. ser. 3, 269.Google Scholar
1873 Champion, (P.), Pellet, (H.), and Grenier, (M.), Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 76, 707.Google Scholar
1875-95 Rammelsberg, (C. F.), Handbuch der Minemlchemie 2nd edn.Google Scholar
1884 Hartley, (W. N.), Phil. Trans. 175, 49, 325.Google Scholar
1885 Ilinski, (M.) and Knorre (G,), Ber. deut. chem. GeselL 18, 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1894 Hillebrand, (W. F.), Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc. 16, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1895 de Gramont, (A.), Bull Soc.franQ. Min. 18, 171.Google Scholar
1896 Lacroix, (A.), Min. de France 2, 274.Google Scholar
1896 Laspeyres, (H.), Zeits. Kryst. Min. 27, 586.Google Scholar
1899 Hess, (W. H.) and Campbell, (E. D.), Joum. Amer. Chem. Soc. 21, 776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1900 Hillebrand, (W. F.) and Stokes, (H. N.), Zeits. anorg. Chem. 25, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1904 Washington, (H. S.), V.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 28.Google Scholar
1905 [Chugaev, (L.)] Tschugaeff, (L.), Zeits. anorg. Chem. 46, 144.Google Scholar
1909 Baudisch, (O.), Chem, Zeitung 33, 1298.Google Scholar
1910 Washington, (H. S.), Manual of the Chemical Analysis of Rocks 2nd edn, New York (Wiley).Google Scholar
1911 [Cain, (J. R.), Journ. Ind. Eng. Chem 3, 476]; abstr. Zeits. anal. Chem. 51, 255 (1912).Google Scholar
1911-31 Doelter y Cisterich, (C. A.), Handbuch der Mineralchemie 14.Google Scholar
1917 Washington, (H. S.), US. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 99.Google Scholar
1922 [Lindner, (J.), Ber. deut. chem. GeselL 55, 2025]; abstr. Zeits. anal. Chem. 65, 335 (1925)Google Scholar
1925 [Powell, (A. R.) and Schoeller, (W. R.), Analyst 50,485]; in Schoeller, (W. R.), The analytical chemistry of tantalum and niobium London (Chapman and Hall), 1937Google Scholar
1927 Berg, (R.), Joum. prakt. Chem 115, 178; Zeits. anal Chem 70, 341.Google Scholar
1929 Hillebrand, (W. F.) and Lundell (G. E. F.), Applied inorganic analysis New York (Wiley).Google Scholar
1929-34 Lundegardh, (H.)» Die quantitative Spektralanalyse der Elemente, 2 vols., Jena (Fischer).Google Scholar
1931 Stahl, (W.), Zeits. anal. Chem 83, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1932 Emich, (F.), trans. Schneider, (F.), Microchemical laboratory manual New York (Wiley).Google Scholar
1932 Gossner, (B.) and Reindl, (H.), Centr. Min., Abt. A 330.Google Scholar
1932 Hueber, (H.), Tschermaks min. petr. Mitt. 43, 84.Google Scholar
1933 Crook, (T.), History of the Theory of Ore Deposits London (Murby).Google Scholar
1933 Guthrie, (W. C. A.) and Miller, (C. C.), Min. Mag. 23, 405.Google Scholar
1934 [Kolthoff, (J. M.), Stenger, (V. A.), and Moskovitz, (B.), Joum. Amer. Chem. Soc. 56, 812]; abstr. Zeits. anal Chem. 98, 355 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1934 Rowledge, (H. P.), Journ. Roy. Soc. Western Australia 20, 165 [M.A. 6-191].Google Scholar
1939 Hey, (M. H.), Min. Mag. 25, 402.Google Scholar
1939 Miller, (C. C.), Journ. Chem. Soc. 1962.Google Scholar
1940 Hecht, (F.) and Donau, (J.), Anorganische Mikrogewichtsanalyse Wien (Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1943 Fenton, (H. J. H.), Notes on qualitative analysis 2nd edn, Cambridge (University Press).Google Scholar
1945 Vogel, (A. I.), A textbook of qualitative analysis 3rd edn, London (Longmans).Google Scholar
1948 Flagg, (J. F.), Organic reagents used in gravimetric and volumetric analysis New York and London (Interscience).Google Scholar
1950 Bannister, (F. A.), In Hey, (M. H.), Chemical Index of Minerals London (British Museum (Natural History)).Google Scholar
1952 Kolthoff, (I. M.) and Lingane, (J. J.), Polarography 2nd edn, 2 vols., New York and London (Interscience).Google Scholar
1954 Hey, (M. H.), Min. Mag. 30, 481.Google Scholar
1955 Johnson, (W. C.), editor, Organic reagents for metals 5th edn, 1, Chadwell Heath, Essex (Hopkin and Williams).Google Scholar
1957 Prodinger, (W.), Organische Fallungsmittel in der quantitativen Analysey Stuttgart (Enke).Google Scholar
1958 Boltz, (D. F.), Colorimetric determination of non-metals New York (Interscience).Google Scholar
1959 Sandell, (E. B.), Colorimetric determination of traces of metals 3rd edn, New York (Interscience).Google Scholar
1960 Belcher, (R.), Ottendorfer, (L.), and West, (T. S.), Talanta 4, 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1963 Bowen, (H. J. M.), Radioactivation analysis Oxford (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
1963 Davies, (Mansel), editor, Infra-red spectroscopy and molecular structure Amsterdam (Elsevier).Google Scholar
1963 Phillips, (R.), Min. Mag. 33, 701.Google Scholar
1964 Johnson, (W. C.), editor, Organic reagents for metalsy 5th edn, 2, Chadwell Heath, Essex (Hopkin and Williams).Google Scholar
1964 Phillips, (R.) and Layton, (W.), Min. Mag. 33, 1097.Google Scholar
1965 Mason, (B.), Amer. Mus. Novitates no. 2223.Google Scholar
1966 Phillips, (R.), Min. Mag. 35, 945.Google Scholar
1966 Szabadvary, (F.), trans. Svehla, (G.), History of analytical chemistry 2nd edn, Oxford (Pergamon).Google Scholar
1967 Borg, (L. Y.), Min. Mag. 36, 583.Google Scholar
1967 Moss, (A. A.), Hey, (M. H.)? Elliott, (C. J.), and Easton, (A. J.), Ibid. 36, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1968 Goldanskii, (V. I.) and Herber, (R. H.), editors, Chemical applications of Mossbauer spectroscopy New York and London (Academic Press)Google Scholar
1969 Deans, (J. A.) and Rains, (T. C.), Flame Emission and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy New York and London (Marcel Dekker).Google Scholar
1969 Herr, (W.) and Skerra, (B.), In Meteorite Research (P. M.|Millman, editor), 103, Dordrecht (Reidel).Google Scholar
1969 Moore, (Carleton B.), Lewis, (C. F.), and Nava, (D.), In Meteorite Research (Millman, P. M., editor), 738, Dordrecht (Reidel).Google Scholar
1969 Sprenkel-Segel, (E. L.), Ibid. 93.Google Scholar
1970 Hogg, (C. S.) and Meads, (R. E.), Min. Mag. 37, 606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1970 Leavens, (P. B.), White, (J. S., jr.), and Hey, (M. H.), Mineralog. Record 1, 92.Google Scholar
1970 Mavrodineanu, (R.), editor, Analytical Flame Spectroscopy London (Macmillan).Google Scholar
1971 Reay, (A.) and Coombs, (D. S.), Min. Mag. 38, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar