Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:05:56.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A microprobe study of chromites from the Andızlık-Zımparalık area, south-west Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

T. Engin  and
J. W. Aucott
T. Engin
Affiliation:
University of Durham, England
J. W. Aucott
Affiliation:
University of Durham, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Compositional changes in chromites are shown to be related to the degree of alteration of the grains to ‘ferritchromit’. The chromium content of late stage pyroxenites and tremolites may be related to the development of the ‘ferritchromit’. Analysed grains from the chrome ores are shown to have a different chemistry to the accessory chromites in the peridotites.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 38 , Issue 293 , March 1971 , pp. 76 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

M. T. A. Enstitüsü, Maden Etüd Subesi, Ankara, Turkey.

2

Applied Geochemistry group, Institute of Geological Sciences, 64–78 Grays Inn Road, London, W.C. 1.

References

Altinli, (I.E.), 1955. Istanbul Üniversitesi, Fen Fakultesi Mecmuasi. 20, nos. I-2.Google Scholar
Amin, (M.S.), 1948. Econ. Geol. 43, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, (M.H.) and Jackson, (E.D.), 1969. Amer. Min. 54, 1084.Google Scholar
Colin, (H.J.), 1961. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Dergisi (M.T.A. Bulletin), no. 59, 19.(Turkish and French).Google Scholar
Dentex, (E.), 1955. Amer. Min. 40, 353.Google Scholar
Engin, (T.), 1969. Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Engin, (T.) and Hirst, (D.M.), 1970. Trans. Inst. Min. Metal., section B, 79 B16.Google Scholar
Golding, (H.G.) and Bayliss, (P.), 1968. Amer. Min. 53, 162.Google Scholar
Gracianskv, (P. CH. DE), 1968. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Dergisi (M.T.A. Bulletin), no. 71, 73.(Turkish and French).Google Scholar
Horninger, (G.), 1941. Zeits. Krist. Min. Abh. 52, 312.Google Scholar
Van Der Kaaden, (G.) and Metz, (K.), 1954. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni (Bulletin of the Geological Society of Turkey), 5, nos. 1-2, 71 (German with Turkish summary).Google Scholar
Van Der Kaaden, (G.) and Metz, (K.), 1959. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Dergisi, (M.T.A. Bulletin), no. 52, 1.(Turkish and English).Google Scholar
Van Der Kaaden, (G.) and Metz, (K.), 1960. CENTO Symposium on Chrome Ores, p. 109 (Ankara).Google Scholar
Maxwell, (J.C.), 1949. Econ. Geol. 44, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MihÁLIK, (P.) and Saager, (R.), 1968. Amer. Min. 53, 1543.Google Scholar
Panagos, (A.) and Otteman, (J.), 1966. Mineralium Deposit. 1, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spangenbero, (K.), 1943. Zeits. prakt. Geologic. 51, 13.23, 25-35.Google Scholar
Thayer, (T.P.), 1964. Econ. Geol. 59, 1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijkerslooth, (P.D.), 1943. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Dergisi (M.T.A. Bulletin), nos. 2-30. 254 (Turkish and German).Google Scholar