Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:10:08.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Garnetiferous striped amphibolites from Connemara, Western Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Bernard E. Leake*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Bristol, Bristol 8, England

Summary

The chemical factors controlling the rare appearance of garnet in Connemara amphibolites are elucidated, including the importance of low oxidation ratio (w), low Mg/(Mg+Fe+Mn) (mg), and high MnO. Pressure is believed to be critical in determining whether garnet is common in amphibolites in any one terrain and it is suggested that the ratio mg × w/MnO (called g) in serial analyses of garnetiferous amphibolites can be used as a measure of the pressure of metamorphism.

89 Connemara amphibolite analyses with plagioclase and hornblende are considered including 31 new analyses, which are reported. Of the 89 analyses, 10 contain garnet, 6 cummingtonite, 16 clinopyroxene including 3 with garnet and clinopyroxene and 2 with garnet and cummingtonite. The coexisting garnet and hornblende in 3 amphibolites have been analysed, including one sample in which brown-green and green hornblende, cummingtonite, plagioclase, garnet, and ilmenite have been analysed. Cummingtonite does not coexist with clinopyroxene or sphene and its presence is controlled by pancity of Ca as well as medium to low pressure in metamorphism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binns, (R.A.), 1964 . Journ. Geol. Soc. Australia, 11,283.10.1080/00167616408728577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, (M.J.B.) and Leake, (B.E.), 1968. Proc. Roy. Irish Aead. 67, B, 1.Google Scholar
Elliott, (R.B.) and Cowan, (D.R.), 1966. Norsk Geol. Tidsskr. 46, 309.Google Scholar
Engel, (A.E.J.) and Engel, (C.C.), 1960. Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 71, 1.10.1130/0016-7606(1960)71[1:PMAGOT]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, (A.E.J.) and Engel, (C.C.), 1962. Geol. Soc. America Petrologic Studies: A volume to honor A. F. Buddington, 37.Google Scholar
Evans, (B.W.) and Leake, (B.E.), 1960. Journ. Petrology, 1,337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, (B.W.) and Leake, (B.E.), 1970. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 70, B, 105.Google Scholar
Floor, (P.), 1966. Leidse Geol. Meded. 36, 1.Google Scholar
Holdaway, (M.J.), 1971. Amer. Journ. Sci. 271, 97.10.2475/ajs.271.2.97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, (H.W.), 1951. Amer. Min. 56, 133.Google Scholar
Kalsbeek, (F.) and Leake, (B.E.), 1970. Medd. Gronland, 190, No. 4.Google Scholar
Kanisawa, (S.), 1969. Contr. Min. Petr. 20, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisch, (H.J.) and Warnaars, (F.W.), 1969. Ibid. 24, 245.Google Scholar
Klein, (C., Jr.), 1968. Journ. Petrology, 9, 281.10.1093/petrology/9.2.281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauskopf, (K.B.), 1967. Introduction to geochemistry. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Leake, (I. E.), 1965. In Controls of Metamorphism. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Hendry, (G.L.), Kemp, (A.), Plant, (A.G.), Harvey, (P.K.), Wilson, (J.R.), COATS (J. S.), Aucott, (J.W.), Lünel (Z.), and Howarth, (R.J.), 1969. Chemical Geology, 5, 7.Google Scholar
Manson, (V.), 1967. In Basalts, Vol. I of the Poldervaart treatise. Interscience, New York and London.Google Scholar
Richardson, (S.W.), 1968. Journ. Petrology, 9, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, (P.) and Jaffe, (H.W.), 1969. Min. Soc. Amer. Spec. Paper, 2, 251.Google Scholar
Staioo, (F.), 1958. Journ. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sec. II, 11, 131.Google Scholar
Van DE KAMP, (P.C.), 1970. Journ. Geol. 78, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waard, (D.D.), 1967. Journ. Petrology, 8, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, (J.D.H.), 1934. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 90, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, (H.S.) and Keith, (M.L.), 1951 Amer. Min. 36, 519.Google Scholar