Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:59:16.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ganomalite from Franklin, New Jersey, and Jakobsberg, Sweden: new chemical and crystallographic data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Pete J. Dunn
Affiliation:
Department of Mineral Sciences, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, USA
Donald R. Peacor
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
John W. Valley
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
Charles A. Randall
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA

Abstract

Chemical analyses for ganomalite from Franklin, New Jersey, and Jakobsberg, Nordmark, Sweden, imply that Mn is an essential element and that the formula is Pb9Ca5MnSi9O33, with Z = 1 for the hexagonal unit cell. Preliminary crystal structure data confirm that Mn and Ca are ordered, as implied by the chemical analyses. Ganomalite is hexagonal, space group P3, with a = 9.82 and c = 10.13 Å. Occurrences of samples from both localities are described, together with analytical data for macedonite from Jakobsberg.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.

Present address: Thomas Road, Rindge, New Hampshire 03461.

References

Burke, E. A. J., and Kieft, C. (1971) Lithos, 4, 101-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, E. S. (1892) The System of Mineralogy 6th edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Dunn, P. J. (1979) Mineral. Record, 10, 47-8.Google Scholar
Engel, G. (1972) Naturwissenschaften, 59, 121-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flink, G. (1917) Arkiv Kemi Mineral. Geol. 6, no. 21, 1620.Google Scholar
Iwata, Y., Koizumi, H., Koyano, N., Shibuya, I., and Niizeki, N. (1973) J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 35, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M. I., Newnham, R. E., and Wolfe, R. W. (1975) Ferro. 9, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, G. (1883) Geol. Fören. Förhand. Stockholm, 6, 662-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newnham, R. E., Wolfe, R. W., and Darlington, C. N. (1973) J. Solid State Phys. 6, 378-83.Google Scholar
NordenskiöldA. E., (1876) Geol. Fören. Förhand. Stockholm, 3, 121.Google Scholar
NordenskiöldA. E., (1877) Ibid. 3, 382-4.Google Scholar
Penfield, S. L., and Warren, C. H. (1899) Am. J. Sci. 4th Series, 8, 339-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjögren, A. (1883) Geol. Fören. Förhand. Stockholm, 6, 531-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welin, E. (1968) Arkiv Mineral. Geol. 4, 499541.Google Scholar