Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:48:54.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluorine in sarcolite: additional history and new chemical data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. Livingstone*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Royal Scottish Museum, Chambers Street, Edinburgh, Scotland

Abstract

The historical background leading to the discovery of sarcolite by Thomson is reviewed. Many mineralogical reference works quote Thompson (1807) but no paper on sarcolite by Thomson has been found; also the spelling of Thomson is incorrect on numerous occasions. The history of sarcolite from its original discovery is reviewed. Chemically, sarcolite is inadequately characterized in spite of a structural study by Giuseppetti et al. (1977). All known chemical analyses are collated and discussed. Two new analyses, using a combination of gravimetric, colorimetric, atomic absorption, and electron probe methods, are presented which show sarcolite to contain 2 wt. % flourine. The presence of this element in sarcolite was reported in 1860 but no quantitative data given; the new determinations cast some doubt over certain aspects of the sarcolite structure.

Measured densities of sarcolite range from 2.93 to 2.96 (mean 2.95) gm/cm3; the tetragonal unit cell of a 12.32 and c 15.48 Å leads to a calculated density of 2.925 gm/cm3 using the empirical formula. Empirically sarcolite may be expressed as:

Na1.38Ca6.0(Ca0.37,K0.13,Fe0.08,Sr0.07,Mg0.05)Σ0.70 Al3.90Si6.02P0.54O26.20F1.06C0.06

and ideally

Na2Ca12(Ca,K,Fe,Sr,Mg)2Al8Si12(P,Si)O52F2

and suggests 27 (oxygen and fluorine) atoms in the quarter unit cell.

Details are given of the mineralogical assemblage, optical properties, infra-red and thermal behaviour of sarcolite which, after 176 years, is still known from only one locality—Monte Somma.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breislak, S. (1818) Institutions Geologiques, Milan 3, 195.Google Scholar
Breithaupt, A. (1841) Annalen. Phys. Chem. Poggendorff. 53, 145.Google Scholar
Brooke, H. J. (1831) Phil. Mag. 10, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, J. D. (1837) A System of Mineralogy, 1st edn., 279, 283, and 284.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. (1844) Ibid. 2nd edn., 337, 340, and 359.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. (1850) Ibid. 3rd edn., 311 and 343.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. (1854) Ibid. 4th edn., 2, 200.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D. (1868) Ibid. 5th edn., 317.Google Scholar
Faujas-Saint-Fond, (1808) Annales Museum D'Histoire Naturelle, Paris. 11, 42–6.Google Scholar
Giuseppetti, G., Mazzi, F., and Tadini, C. (1977) Tschermaks Mineral. Petrog. Mitt, 24, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, R. T. (1939) Nature. 143, 667–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiiy, A. (1809) Tableau Comparatif Des Resultats De La Cristallographie et de E Analyse Chimique, Paris, 199.Google Scholar
Haiiy, A. (1822) Traite de Mineralogie, Paris. 3, 173.Google Scholar
Hey, M. H. (1939) Mineral. Mag. 25, 402.Google Scholar
Pauly, A. (1906) Centralblatt fur Mineral. Geol. 266.Google Scholar
Rammelsberg, C. F. (1860) Annalen. Phys. Chem. Poggendorff. 109, 567.Google Scholar
Scacchi, A. (1842) Distrib. Sistem. Min. Naples, 66.Google Scholar
Vauquelin, L. N. (1807) Annales Museum D'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 9, 241–50.Google Scholar
Waterston, C. D. (1965) Univ. Edinburgh J. Autumn, 122–34.Google Scholar
Wehrenberg, J. P. (1971) Am. Mineral. 56, 1639–54.Google Scholar
Zambonini, F. (1910) Mineralogia Vesuviana, 14, ser. 2, no. 6, 247.Google Scholar
Zambonini, F. (1935) Ibid. 2nd edn. Torino Rosenberg e Sellier, 215–20.Google Scholar
Zambonini, F. and Caglioti, V. (1931) Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. 192, 967–70.Google Scholar