Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:29:30.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exsolution in titanomagnetites as an indicator of cooling rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Geoffrey D. Price
Geoffrey D. Price*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The scale and nature of the exsolution textures developed in some titanomagnetites have been used to calculate the rate at which the oxides were cooling at the time of exsolution. The cooling rates were calculated by evaluating a kinetic model, which describes the growth of an ulvöspinel-rich lamella in titanomagnetite during exsolution. The model was evaluated both by numerical techniques and by an approximate analytical method.

The cooling rates during titanomagnetite exsolution of the Taberg, Skaergaard and part of the Mt. Yamaska intrusions were calculated to be approximately 130, 12 and 6000°C per 1000 years respectively. These values are in good agreement with cooling rates calculated from heat flow models of the intrusions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 46 , Issue 338 , March 1982 , pp. 19 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, H. L. (1958 Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 212, 450–1.Google Scholar
Carslaw, H. S., and Jaeger, J. C. (1959 Conduction of heat in solids. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cliff, G., and Lorimer, G. W. (1972 Proc. Fifth Europ. Cong. on Elect. Microsc. Manchester, 140–1.Google Scholar
Crank, J. (1956 The mathematics of diffusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Elphick, S. C. (1977 Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. I., and Ogilvie, R. E. (1965 Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 29, 893–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, J. I., and Ogilvie, R. E. and Short, J. M. (1967 Ibid. 31, 1733–70.Google Scholar
Graham, L. D., and Kraft, R. W. (1966 Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 236, 94–102.Google Scholar
Hjelmquist, S. (1950 Sven. Geol. Unders. Arsbok. 43, 1–55.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. C. (1959 Am. J. Sci. 255, 306–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, W. (1952 Diffusion in solids, liquids and gases. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lifshitz, I. M., and Slyozov, V. V. (1961 J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 19, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. W., and Doherty, R. D. (1976 Stability of microstructures in metallic systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McConnell, J. D. C. (1975 Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 3, 125–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, G. T., and Goldstein, J. I. (1974 Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 38, 1201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyamoto, M., and Takeda, H. (1977 Geochem. J. 11, 161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moren, A. F. (1978 Ph.D. Thesis, Lehigh University.Google Scholar
Norton, D., and Taylor, H. P. (1979 J. Petrol. 20, 421–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, G. D. (1980 Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 23, 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, G. D. (1981a) Mineral. Mag. 44, 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, G. D. (1981b) Am. Mineral. 66, 751–8.Google Scholar
Wood, J. A. (1964 Icarus, 3, 429–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yund, R. A., McLaren, A. C., and Hobbs, B. E. (1974 Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 48, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar