Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:42:49.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disorder and compositional variation in the lillianite homologous series

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. Pring
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
M. Jercher
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
E. Makovicky
Affiliation:
Mineralogical Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

High resolution transmission electron microscopy studies on the lillianite group minerals from the Ivigtut cryolite deposit, Ivigtut, South Greenland revealed the existence of disordered intergrowths of lillianite/gustavite-like blocks (N − 4) and heyrovskyite-like (N = 7) structural blocks. One disorder sequence is examined in detail, which gave an average homologue number N = 4.92 corresponding to a composition of Pb3.922xBixAgxS6.92 with x ≈ 1.2. An Axial Next-Nearest Neighour Ising model was used to follow the fluctuations in the average homologue number N across the crystal. This yielded compositional fluctuations of the order of 70–170 Å over a 1800 Å region of the crystal, with a 202 Å lamella of ordered vikingite. Trends in the randomness of the gustavite-vikingite intergrowth were evaluated and the dominant slab sequence was found to be 4,4,4,7 and 4,4,7,7, suggesting that some longer period homologues may be stable. A number of defects were noted in which changes in slab widths were accommodated. The origin of these partially ordered/disordered lillianite homologues is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Current address: Anger Straße 27, 40593 Düsseldorf, Germany.

References

Drits, V.A. and Sakharov, B.A. (1976) X-ray Structure Analysis of Mixed-Layer Minerals. Nauka, Moscow, (in Russian).Google Scholar
Hoda, S.N. and Chang, L.L. (1975) Phase relations in the system PbS–Ag2S–Sb2S3 and PbS–Ag2S–Bi2S3 . Amer. Mineral., 60, 621–33.Google Scholar
Karup-Møller, S. (1977) Mineralogy of some Ag–(Cu)–Pb–Bi sulphide associations. Bull. Geol. Soc. Denmark, 26, 41–68.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1977) Chemistry and crystallography of the lillianite homologous series. Part III. Crystal chemistry of the lillianite homologous series. Related phases. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh., 131, 187–207.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1981) The building principles and classification of bismuth-lead sulphosalts and related compounds. Fortsch. Mineral., 59, 137–90.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1985) The building principles and classification of sulphosalts based on the SnS archetype. Fortsch. Mineral., 63, 4589.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1989) Modular classification of sulphosalts-current status: Definition and application of homologous series. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh., 160, 269–97.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. and Karup-Møller, S. (1977 a) Chemistry and crystallography of the lillianite homologous series. Part I. General properties and definitions. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh., 130, 264–87.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. and Karup-Møller, S. (1977 b) Chemistry and crystallography of the lillianite homologous series. Part II. Definition of new minerals; eskimoite, vikingite, ourayite and treasurite. Redefinition of schirmerite and new data on the lillianite-gustavite solid solution series. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh., 131, 5682.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. and Karup-Møller, S. (1984) Ourayite from Ivigtut, Greenland. Canad. Mineral., 22, 565–75.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E., Mumme, W.G. and Madsen, I.C. (1992) The crystal structure of vikingite. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Mh., 454–68.Google Scholar
Price, G.D. and Yeomans, J. (1986) A model for polysomatism. Mineral. Mag., 50, 149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pring, A. (1989) Structural disorder in aikinite and krupkaite. Amer. Mineral., 74, 250–5.Google Scholar
Pring, A. (1995) Annealing of synthetic hammarite, Cu2Pb2Bi4S9, and the nature of cation ordering processes in the bismuthinite-aikinite series. Amer. Mineral., 80, 1168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowron, A. and Tilley, R.J.D. (1986) The transforma- tion of chemically twinned phases in the PbS–Bi2S3 system to the galena structure. Chemica Scripta, 26, 353–8.Google Scholar
Skowron, A. and Tilley, R.J.D. (1990) Chemical twinned phases in the Ag2S–PbS–Bi2S3 system. Part 1 Electron microscope study. J. Solid State Chem., 85, 235–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, R.J.D. and Wright, A.C. (1982) Chemical twinning in the PbS region of the PbS–Bi2S3 system. Chemica Scripta, 19, 1822.Google Scholar
Veblen, D.R. and Buseck, P.R. (1979) Chain-width order and disorder in biopyriboles. Amer. Mineral., 64, 687700.Google Scholar
Veblen, D.R., Buseck, P.R. and Burnham, C.W. (1977) Asbestiform chain silicates: New minerals and structural groups. Science, 198, 359–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, T.J. and Hyde, B.G. (1982 a) An electron microscope study of the humite minerals: I Mg- humites. Phys. Chem. Min., 8, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T.J. and Hyde, B.G. (1982 b) An electron microscope study of the humite minerals: II Mn- humites. Phys. Chem. Min., 8, 167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar