Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T22:45:53.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cooling rate studies of rocks from two basic dykes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

G. M. Corrigan
G. M. Corrigan*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Nucleation and crystal growth of plagioclase have been studied in two basaltic melts by one atmosphere, constant-rate and variable-rate cooling experiments using the wire-loop technique (Donaldson et al., 1975). Constant-rate cooling studies indicate that the length of the incubation period prior to nucleation varies systematically with the degree of supercooling and with the cooling rate. Attempts to determine the rates at which the marginal parts of two dykes (from the Isle of Arran, SW Scotland) cooled, by the attempted reproduction of the natural textural features, in constant-rate cooling experiments suggest that for one of the dykes, plagioclase phenocrysts at the contact could have grown at a cooling rate of approximately 3°C/hour and the groundmass plagioclase laths at faster cooling rates in excess of 10°C/hour. For the other dyke the plagioclase laths in the rocks 0.5 cm from the dyke contact probably grew at rates slower than 2°C/hour. Attempts to validate experimentally the Jaeger (1957) cooling model for the two dykes suggest that the dykes cooled at much slower rates than the theory predicts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 46 , Issue 340 , September 1982 , pp. 387 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: 22 Newbould Lane, Sheffield, S10 2PL.

References

Donaldson, C. H., Williams, R. J., and Lofgren, G. (1975) Am. Mineral. 60, 324–6.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. C. (1957) Am. J. Sci. 255, 306–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottinga, (Y.) and Weill, (D.F.) 1970. Am. J. Sci. 269, 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, (E.E.) 1951. Crystal Growth, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Clark, (S.P.) 1966. Handbook of Physical Constants, Geol. Soc. Amer. Mes., 97.Google Scholar
Corrigan, (G.) 1980. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Corrigan, (G.) and Gibb, (F.G.F.) 1979. Mineral. mag. 43, 121–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, (C.H.) 1978. frog. Exp. Petrol. 4, 13–16.Google Scholar
Donaldson, (C.H.) 1979. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 69, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, (C.H.), Williams, (R.J.), and Lofgren, (G.) 1975. Am Mineral. 60, 324–26.Google Scholar
Donaldson, (C.H.), Usselman, (T.M.) Williams, (R.J.). and Lofgren, (G.E.) 1975. Proc. 6th. Lunar Sci. Conf. (Suppl. 6, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta). 843-69.Google Scholar
Gray, (N.H.) 1968. M.SC. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
Gray, (N.H.) 1970. Can. J. Earth Sci. 7, 366–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eamilton, (D. L.) and Anderson, (G.M.) 1967. In: H.H. Hess and A. Poldervart: Basalts, 445-82. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Jaeger, (J.C.) 1957. Am. J , Sci. 225, 306–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, (A.C.) 1898. Geol. Surv. Michigan. 6, 123–51.Google Scholar
Lofgren, (G.E.) and Donaldson, (C.H.) 1975. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union 56, 468.Google Scholar
Lofgren, (G.E.), Donaldson, (C.H.), Williams (R. J.) , Mullins, (O.), Usselman, (T.H.) 1974. Proc. 5th. Lunar Sci. Conf. (Suppl. 5, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1, 549–67.Google Scholar
Lofgren, (G.E.), Donaldson, (C.H.), and Usselman, (T.A.) 1975. Proc. 6th. Lunar Sci. Conf. (Suppl. 6, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1, 79–100.Google Scholar
Queneau, (A.L.) 1902. Columbia Univ. School of Mines Quarterly. 23, 181–95.Google Scholar
Walker, (D.), Kirkpatrick, (R.J.), Longhi, (J.), and Hays, (J.F.) 1976. Geol. See. Am. Bull. 87, 646–56.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar