Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T05:01:25.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments on the validity of badenite and epigenite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Peter Bayliss*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Calgary, Alberta Canada T2N 1N4

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, L. G., and Thompson, R. M. (1962) Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 85.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A. (1960) Econ. Geol. 55, 1345–81 and 1631–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, E. S., and Ford, W. E. (1909) Second appendix to the sixth edition of Dana's system of mineralogy. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Embrey, P. G., and Fuller, J. P. (1980) A manual of new mineral names 1892–1978. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischer, M. (1980) Glossary of mineral species. Mineral. Rec, Tucson, Az.Google Scholar
Hansen, M., and Anderko, K. (1958) Constitution of binary alloys. McGraw-Hill, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinstry, H. E. (1957) N.Y. Acad. Sci. Trans. 20, 1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, K. C and Fleet, M. E. (1975) Can. Mineral. 13, 814.Google Scholar
Palache, C., Berman, H., and Frondel, C. (1944) Dana's system of mineralogy. 7th edn. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Roseboom, E. H. (1963) Am. Mineral. 48, 271–99.Google Scholar
Strunz, H. (1970) Mineralogische Tabellen. Geest and Portig, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. A., and Kullerud, G. (1971) Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearb. 69, 315–18.Google Scholar