Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:16:38.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemistry and microstructure of orthoamphiboles from cordierite-amphibole rocks at Outokumpu, North Karelia, Finland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Peter J. Treloar  and
Andrew Putnis
Peter J. Treloar
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ
Andrew Putnis
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Orthoamphiboles from the cordierite-amphibole-bearing rocks at Outokumpu span a large part of the gedrite-anthophyllite solid-solution series. The amphiboles grew at temperatures near to or just above that of the solvus crest with post-metamorphic cooling resulting in sub-solvus exsolution, the distribution of which is compatible with an asymmetric solvus in which the anthophyllite limb is the steeper. Metamorphic conditions in the area imply that the crest of the solvus is unlikely to be at a temperature in excess of about 600 °C Electron microprobe traverses and Al-Kα scans show that the amphibole compositions vary rapidly both along and across grains. These variations can be explained by varying availability of Na controlling the extent of the edenitic substitution in the solid solution series. In this case this variability in Na availability may be explained by the external control of μNa through the fluid phase.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 45 , Issue 337 , 1982 , pp. 55 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, D. S. (1980) Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 71, 185-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinner, G. A., and Fox, J. S. (1974) Geol. Mag. 111, 397-408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskola, P. (1933) Bull. Comm. Geol. Finland, 103, 2644.Google Scholar
Gaal, G., Koistinen, T., and Mattila, E. (1975) Bull. Geol. Surv. Finland, 271, 1-67.Google Scholar
Gittos, M. R., Lorimer, G. W., and Champness, P. E. (1976) In Electron Microscopy in Mineralogy, Wenk, H. R. et al. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 238-47.Google Scholar
Huhma, A., and Huhma, M. (1970) Bull. Geol. Soc. Finland, 42, 57-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R. S., Grieve, R. A. F., and Pauk, L. (1978) Am. J. Sci. 278, 41-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S. H. (1976) In Electron Microscopy in Mineralogy, Wenk, H. R. et al. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 465-72.Google Scholar
Koistinen, T. J. (1981) Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 72, 115-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makela, M. (1974) Bull. Geol. Surv. Finland, 267, 1-45.Google Scholar
Mikkola, A. (1980) Ibid. 305, 1-22.Google Scholar
Peltola, E. (1978) Econ. Geol. 73, 461-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnis, A., and McConnell, J. D. C. (1980) Principles of Mineral Behaviour, Blackwells, Oxford.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., and Jaffe, H. W. (1969) Mineral. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper, 2, 251-74.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., Ross, M., and Jaffe, H. W. (1971) Am. Mineral. 56, 1005-41.Google Scholar
Ross, M., Papike, J. J., and Shaw, K. W. (1969) Mineral. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper, 2, 275-99.Google Scholar
Spear, F. S. (1980) Am. Mineral. 65, 1103-18.Google Scholar
Stoddard, E. F. (1979) Geol. Soc. Am. Abs. with Progs., Cordilleran Section 11, 130.Google Scholar
Treloar, P. J., Koistinen, T. J., and Bowes, D. R. (1981) Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 72, 201-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuominen, H. V., and Mikkola, T. (1950) Bull. Comm. Geol. Finland, 150, 67-92.Google Scholar
Vallance, T. G. (1967) J. Petrol. 8, 84-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, D. R., and Buseck, P. R. (1979) Am. Mineral. 64, 687-700.Google Scholar