Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:02:41.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BIOPROTA: international collaboration in biosphere research for radioactive waste disposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

K. Smith ,
G. M. Smith  and
S. Norris
K. Smith*
Affiliation:
Eden Nuclear and Environment Ltd, Eden Conference Barn, Low Moor, Penrith, Cumbria CA10 1XQ, UK
G. M. Smith
Affiliation:
GMS Abingdon Ltd, Tamarisk, Radley Road, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3PP, UK
S. Norris
Affiliation:
Radioactive Waste Management Directorate, Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RH, UK
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consideration of the biosphere is important in the post-closure safety assessment of a geological disposal facility (GDF) as the biosphere acts as the receptor for any contaminants that may be released from the geosphere. Considerable uncertainty exists in the characteristics of the biosphere at times in the far future when any contaminant releases from a GDF would reach the accessible environment. These uncertainties include human behaviour, affecting environmental change as well as exposure modes.

A number of critical scientific issues have been identified through the practical application of the International Atomic Energy Agency reference biosphere approach within both site generic and site specific repository assessment projects. These issues are being addressed through an international collaboration programme, BIOPROTA. The purpose of this paper is to describe the BIOPROTA programme, its objectives and typical working method. The approach is illustrated with examples from the recent work programme including model intercomparison studies for the radionuclides 36Cl and 79Se.

Keywords

biosphere researchgeosphere-biosphere interfacedose assessment modelswaste disposal
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 8 , December 2012 , pp. 3233 - 3240
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
© [2012] The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2012

References

BIOPROTA (2005a) Model Review and Comparison for Spray Irrigation Pathway. A report prepared within the international collaborative project BIOPROTA: Key Issues in Biosphere Aspects of Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Contaminated Releases Associated with Radioactive Waste Management. Main Contributors: U. Bergström (Task Leader), A. Albrecht B. Kaynar G. Smith M.C. Thorne H. Yoshida and M. Wasiolek. Published on behalf of the BIOPROTA Steering Committee by SKB, Sweden.Google Scholar
BIOPROTA (2005b) Modelling the Inhalation Exposure Pathway. A report prepared within the international collaborative project BIOPROTA. Key Issues in Biosphere Aspects of Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Contaminated Releases Associated with Radioactive Waste Management. Main Contributors: M. Waiolek (Task Leader), A. Agü ero, A. Albrecht, U. Bergström, H. Grogan, G.M. Smith, M.C. Thorne, M. Willans and H. Yoshida. Published on behalf of the BIOPROTA Steering Committee by BNFL (Nexia Solutions Ltd), UK.Google Scholar
BIOPROTA (2005c) Model review and comparison for C-14. A report prepared within the international collaborative project BIOPROTA. Key Issues in Biosphere Aspects of Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Contaminated Releases Associated with Radioactive Waste Management. Main Contributors: S. Shepard (Task Leader) and M.C. Thorne. Published on behalf of the BIOPROTA Steering Committee by UK Nirex Ltd, UK.Google Scholar
BIOPROTA (2005d) Model Intercomparison with focus on accumulation in soil. A report prepared within the international collaborative project BIOPROTA. Key Issues in Biosphere Aspects of Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Contaminated Releases Associated with Radioactive Waste Management. Main Contributors: A. Albrecht, C. Damois, E. Kerrrigan, R. Klos, G.M. Smith, M. Thorne, M. Willans and H. Yoshida. Published on behalf of the BIOPROTA Steering Committee by ANDRA, France.Google Scholar
BIOPROTA (2005e) Application of Biotic Analogue Data. A report prepared within the international collaborative project BIOPROTA. Key Issues in Biosphere Aspects of Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Contaminated Releases Associated with Radioactive Waste Management. Main Contributors: E. Kerrigan (Task Leader), G.M. Smith and M.C. Thorne. Published on behalf of the BIOPROTA Steering Committee by UK Nirex Ltd, UK.Google Scholar
BIOPROTA (2005f) Modelling Processes in the Geosphere Biosphere Interface Zone. A report prepared within the international collaborative project BIOPROTA. Key Issues in Biosphere Aspects of Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Contaminated Releases Associated with Radioactive Waste Management. Main Contributors: P. Pinedo and G.M. Smith (Task Leaders), A. Agü ero, A. Albrecht, A. Bath, H. Benhaderrahmane, F. van Dorp, U. Kautsky, R. Kos, A. Laciok, T. Milodowski, J-O. Selroos, I. Simón, D. Texier, M.C. Thorne and M. Willans. Published on behalf of the BIOPROTA Steering Committee by CIEMAT, Spain.Google Scholar
BIOPROTA (2006) Guidance on Site-Specific Biosphere Characterisation and Experimental Research and Field Research Protocols. A report prepared within the international collaborative project BIOPROTA: Key Issues in Biosphere Aspects of Assessment of the Long-Term Impact of Contaminated Releases Associated with Radioactive Waste Management. Main Contributors: E. Leclerc-Cessac, M.C. Thorne and G. Thomson. Published on behalf of the BIOPROTA Steering Committee by ANDRA, France.Google Scholar
Coppin, F., Garcia-Sanchez, L., Krimissa, M. and Martin-Garin, A. (2011) Modeling selenium soil/ solution distribution by using a combination of equilibrium and kinetic approaches. ICOBTE 2011 (Firenze 3rd-7th July 2011).Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (2003) Reference biospheres for solid radioactive waste disposal. Report of BIOMASS Theme 1 of the BIOsphere Modelling and ASSessment (BIOMASS) Programme IAEA-BIOMASS-6. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (2009). Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Terrestrial and Freshwater Environments. Technical Reports Series No. 472. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Limer, L. and Thorne, M. (2010) NDA RWMD Biosphere Assessment Studies FY2009–2010. The biosphere transport, distribution and radiological impact of Se-79 released in groundwater from a geological disposal facility. Report QRS-1378W-4, Version 1.1, September 2010.Google Scholar
Limer, L., Albrecht A., Marang L., Miquel S., Tamponnet, C., Nakai, K., Gierzewski, P., Thorne, M. and Smith, G. (2008) Investigation of Cl-36 Behaviour in Soils and Uptake into Crops. Report prepared under the international BIOPROTA programme. ANDRA report C.RP.ASTR.08.0048.Google Scholar
ANDRA, Châtenay-Malabry, France. Limer, L., Albrecht, A., Bytwerk, D., Marang, L., Smith, G. and Thorne, M. (2009) Cl-36 Phase 2: Dose Assessment Uncertainties and Variability. Final report for the BIOPROTA programme. ANDRA report DRP.CSTR. 09.0026. ANDRA, Ch âtenay- Malabry, France.Google Scholar
Limer, L., Smith, K., Albrecht, A., Marang, L., Norris, S., Smith, G., Thorne, M. and Xu, S. (2011) C-14 Long-Term Dose Assessment in a Terrestrial Agricultural Ecosystem: FEP Analysis, Scenario Development, and Model Comparison. BIOPROTA report, version 3.0 (Final), 14 November 2011.Google Scholar
Limer, L., Albrecht, A., Hormann, V., Gallerand, M.-O., Medri, C., Perez-Sanchez, D., Smith, K., Smith, G. and Thorne, M. (2011) Improving Confidence in Long-term Dose Assessments for U- 238 Series Radionuclides. BIOPROTA report, version 1.0 (final draft), 25 May 2011.Google Scholar
Miquel, S. (2008) Developpement et Integration d’un Modele de Transfert sol Multicouche dans le Logiciel Matlab. Rapport Societe de Calcul Mathematique, S.A. No. C.RP.FSTR.08.0009.A.Google Scholar
Miquel, S. and Basso, M. (2010) Considération d’une Fluctuation du Niveau de la Nappe dans le Modéle sol Multicouche: Applications au Programme Scientifique FAVL-Radifére; Rapport Final. Report number: F.RP.FSTR.10.0017.A, Société de Calcul Mathématique, Paris.Google Scholar
Smith, K. and Smith, G. (2011) International Workshop on the Functioning of the Geosphere-Biosphere Interface Zone. Workshop report, version 1.0 (draft), 7 November 2011.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Sheppard, S., Albrecht, A., Coppin, F., Fevrier, L., Lahdenpera, A-M., Keskinen, R., Marang, L., Perez, D., Smith, G., Thiry, Y., Thorne, M. and Jackson, D. (2009) Modelling the Abundance of Se-79 in Soils and Plants for Safety Assessments of the Underground Disposal of Radioactive Waste. BIOPROTA report version 2.0, 30 November 2009.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Smith, G. and Thiry, Y. (editors) (2010a) International workshop on the environmental behaviour of radium: Workshop Report, Version 2.0, 24 June 2010.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Robinson, C., Jackson, D., De Laz Cruz, I., Zinger, I. and Avila, R. (2010b) Non-human Biota Dose Assessment: Sensitivity Analysis and Knowledge Quality Assessment (September 2010). Report prepared under the BIOPROTA international programme, www.bioprota.org. Published as Posiva Working Report 2010–69.by Posiva, Olkiluoto, Finland.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Albrecht, A., Thorne, M., Coppin, F., Ikonen, A., Perez-Sanchez, D. and Smith, G. (2011). Se-79 in the Soil-Plant System Phase 2: Approaches to Modelling. BIOPROTA report, version 2.0, 28 July 2011.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Jackson, D., Smith, G. and Norris, S. (2012) Comparison of modelled uptake to cereal crops of 14C from gaseous or groundwater mediated pathways. Mineralogical Magazine, 76, 3241–3249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, M.C. (2010) Development of a Model to Represent the Behaviour of Se-79 in Soils and Plants. A report produced for CIEMAT. Report reference MTA/P0014/2010–2. Issue 1.Google Scholar
Torudd, J. (2010) Long Term Radiological Effects on Plants and Animals of a Deep Geological Repository, SR-Site Biosphere. SKB Technical Report TR-10–08. December 2010.Google Scholar