Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:56:58.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray data and chemical analyses of some titanomagnetite and ilmenite samples from the Bushveld Complex, South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

T. C. Molyneux
T. C. Molyneux*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Pretoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The cell dimensions of powder samples of some Bushveld titanomagnetites and ilmenites were determined using a 114·6 mm AEG Guinier camera. The average cell dimension of the titanomagnetite is 8·400±0·005 Å and there is no definite relationship between the cell edge of the samples and their position in the layered sequence. The average cell parameters of coarse-grained ilmenite are a 5·085±0·005 Å and c 14·09±0·02 Å. Ilmenite that has replaced ulvöspinel has on average a value of some 0·003 Å greater than that of associated coarse ilmenite grains.

Chemical analyses indicate that titanomagnetite from pegmatoidal plugs and from the top of layered sequence was generally subject to late-stage magmatic alteration and hence lies in the Titanomagnetite II field. In the Bushveld Complex there is an increase in the TiO2 content of titanomagnetite from some 12 % at the base to 18 % at the top of the Upper Zone. However, Bushveld titanomagnetite tends to be poorer in TiO2 than similar samples from the Skaergaard intrusion.

A discrepancy between modal and normative hercynite in the Bushveld samples indicates that a considerable amount of hercynite is probably still in solid solution in the titanomagnetite.

Chemical analyses of Bushveld ilmenites reveal that they lie in the same tholeiitic field as those of the Skaergaard intrusion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 38 , Issue 299 , September 1972 , pp. 863 - 871
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: c/o Anglo American Corporation of South Africa, Limited, P.O. Box 61587, Marshalltown, Transvaal.

References

Anderson, (A.T.), 1968. Journ. Geol. 76, 528-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, (K.), 1966. Amer. Min. 51, 1799-1805.Google Scholar
Chevallier, (R.), Bolfa, (J.), and Mathieu, (S.), 1955. Bull. Soc. franc. Min. Crist. 68, 307-46.Google Scholar
Eugster, (H.P.) and Turnock, (A.C.), 1962. Journ. Petrology, 3, 533-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, (C.), 1970. D.Sc. thesis, Univ. Pretoria (unpubl.), 397 PP.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, (C.J.), 1961. Publ. Univ. Pretoria, Pt. II, 75 PP.Google Scholar
Lindsley, (D.H.), 1961. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearbook, 61, 100-7 .Google Scholar
Molyneux, (T.G.), 1970. Geol. Soc. S. Aft., Sp. Publ. 1,228-41.Google Scholar
Renssurg, (W. C. J. VAN), 1965. Ann. Geol. Surv. S. Aft. 4, 113-27.Google Scholar
Vincent, (E.A.) and Phillips, (R.), 1954. Geochimica Acta, 6, 1-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, (E.A.) and Phillips, (R.), Wright, (J.B.), Chevallier, (R.), and MATmEu, (S.), 1957. Min. Mag. 31,624-55.Google Scholar
Willemse, (J.), 1969. Econ. Geol. Monog. 4, 187-208.Google Scholar
Wright, (J.B.), 1961. Min. Mag. 32, 778-89.Google Scholar
Wright, (J.B.), 1964. New Zealand Journ. Geol. Geophys. 7, 424-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar