Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:19:45.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gonnardite and disordered natrolite-group minerals: their distinction and relations with mesolite, natrolite and thomsonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Rab Nawaz
Rab Nawaz*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Ulster Museum, Belfast, Northern Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a literature survey of compositions of the fibrous zeolites mesolite, natrolite, thomsonite and their derivatives such as pseudomesolite, high-Na mesolite, tetranatrolite, paranatrolite, ranite, and gonnardite, and evaluates them in the light of new electron probe analyses and X-ray powder data for gonnardites and associated minerals from Aci Castello, Gignat, Hills Port, Kladno, and Lamo. The analyses are plotted on the basis of bivalent vs. trivalent cations per 80 oxygen cell and a new chemical classification is tentatively proposed. It is concluded that ranite is definitely not synonymous with gonnardite and until species status is confirmed it is useful to retain this term as a Ca- and Al-rich disordered variety of natrolite. It is further concluded that natrolite and tetranatrolite contain up to 2 Ca, ranite 2–4 Ca, gonnardite 4–6 Ca and thomsonite 6–8 Ca atoms with corresponding limits on the Al atoms. Compositions are governed by NaSi = CaAl and to some extent by Na2 = Ca type replacements and the Al-content generally varies sympathetically with Ca-content. The plot reveals that most high-Na mesolites are ranites, a number of gonnardites are ranites and one or two are tetranatrolites. The compositional field of gonnardite crosses that of mesolite (and pseudomesolite), but these minerals can be easily distinguished optically and by their powder patterns. The unit cell volumes increase in the order tetranatrolite, ranite, gonnardite and paranatrolite, therefore if the 1040 (or 1460) line can be identified in the powder patterns one can distinguish between these minerals. New infrared spectra of gonnardite, ranite and tetranatrolite are compared with each other and with published spectra, and differences are noted. DSC results for gonnardite and ranite are compared and appear to be diagnostic.

Keywords

zeolitegonnarditenatroliteranitemesolite thomsonite
Type
Mineralogy
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 52 , Issue 365 , April 1988 , pp. 207 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, A., Vezzalini, G. and Tazzoli, V. (1981) Zeolites 1, 91-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, A., Vezzalini, G. and Tazzoli, V. Pongiluppi, D. and Vezzalini, G. (1982) Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 143, 231-48.Google Scholar
Alberti, A., Vezzalini, G. and Tazzoli, V. .Vezzalini, G. and Peesi-Donath, E. (1983) Acta Geol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 25, 237-46.Google Scholar
Amirov, T., Asratkulu, M.A., Mamedov, Kh. S. and Belov, N.V. (1972) Soviet Physics-Doklady 17, 316. 7.Google Scholar
Andersen, E.K., Dano, M. and Petersen, O.V. (1969) Meddr. om Gronland 181, 1-20.Google Scholar
Antonin, R. (1942) Vestn. Krdl. CeskOSpol. Nauk Tfida Mat. Prir. 1-19.Google Scholar
Benson, W.N. (1942) Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand 72, 160-85. [MA 9-162].Google Scholar
Cavinato, A. (1926) Atti. Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 65, 104-14.[MA 4-319]Google Scholar
Cermakova, J., Fiola, J. and Bauer, J. (1962) Sbornik Vys. Skoly. Chem. Techn. Mineral. 6, 81-94.Google Scholar
Cerny, P. and Povondra, P. (1966) Acta Univ. Carolinae, Geol. 113-22 [MA 19-52].Google Scholar
Chao, G.Y. (1980) Can. Mineral. 18, 85-8.Google Scholar
Chen, T.T. and Chao, G.Y. (1980) Ibid. 18,77-84.Google Scholar
Dunn, P.J. (1976) J. Gemmology 15, 113-8.[MA 77- 584].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efimov, A.F., Ganzeyev, A.A. and Katayeva, Z.T. (1966) DokL Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. Earth Sci. Sect. 169, 148-50.[MA 69-3300].Google Scholar
Foster, M.D. (1965) U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 504- D,E.Google Scholar
Gonnard, F. (1871) Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 73, 1447-9.Google Scholar
Gottardi, G. and Galli, E. (1985) Natural Zeolites. Springer- Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, J.D. and Gault, R.A. (1981) Mineral. Record 12, 221-6.Google Scholar
Guseva, L.D., Menshikoo, Y.P., Romonova, T.S. and Bussen, I.V. (1975) Zap. Vses. Min. Obshch. 104, 66-9.[MA 76-801].Google Scholar
Harada, K. and Nakao, K. (1969) J. Geol. Soc. Japan 75, 343-4.[MA 71-1349].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, K. and Nakao, K. Iwamoto, S. and Kihara, K. (1967) Am. Mineral. 52, 1785-94.Google Scholar
Harada, K. and Nakao, K. Hara, M. and Nakao, K. (1968) Mineral J. 5, 309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, K. and Nakao, K. Umeda, M., Nakao, K. and Nagashima, K. (1969) J. Geol. Soc. Japan 75, 551-2.[MA 71-1347].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, R.L. and Iijima, A. (1968) Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 116, 331-76.Google Scholar
Henderson, E.P. and Glass, J.J. (1933) Am. Mineral. 18, 402-6.Google Scholar
Hey, M.H. (1932a) Mineral. Mag. 23, 51-125. -(1932b) Ibid. 23,243-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iijima, A. and Harada, K. (1969) Am. Mineral. 54, 182–97.Google Scholar
Kuzmankov, M.V. (1950) DoktadyAcad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 72, 767-70.[MA 11-549].Google Scholar
Lacroix, A. (1896) Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. 19, 426.Google Scholar
Mason, B. (1957) Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr. 37, 435-7.Google Scholar
Matsubara, A., Kato, A., Tiba, T., Saito, Y. and Nomura, M. (1979) Mere. National Science Mus., Tokyo 12, 13-22.[MA 82M/1715].Google Scholar
Mazzi, F., Larsen, A.O., Gottardi, G. and Galli, E. (1986). Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 219-28.Google Scholar
Meixner, H., Hey, M.H. and Moss, A.A. (1956) Mineral. Mag. 31, 265-71.Google Scholar
Nawaz, R., Malone, J.F. and Din, V.K. (1985) Ibid. 49,103-5.Google Scholar
Paijkull, S.R. (1874) Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Gesell. 7, 1334-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pongiluppi, D. (1975) Rend. Soc. Ital. Mineral. Petrol. 30, 1201-5.Google Scholar
Raevskii, M.I. and Brovko, Y.I. (1980) Zap. Vses. Min. Obshch. 109, 366-7.[MA 81-1835].Google Scholar
Ramasamy, R. (1981) Curt. Sci. (Banglore) 50, 271-2.Google Scholar
Reeuwijk, L.P. van (1972) Am. Mineral. 57, 499-510.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, R. (1982) J. Microsc. Spectrosc. Electron. 7, 25.Google Scholar
Shkabara, M.N. (1940) Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 26, 659-61.[MA 8-298].Google Scholar
Stella-Starrabba, F. (1947) Notizie di mineral. Siciliana e Calabrese Messina No. 1,49-54 [MA 10-556].Google Scholar
Thompson, M.J. (1970) Unpubl. B.Sc. Thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Tomkeieff, S.I. (1934) Geol. Mag. London 71, 501-12.[MA 6-221].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, T., Oda, N. and Muchi, M. (1982) J. Japan. Assoc. Mineral. Petrol. Econ. Geol., 77 78-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T.L. (1932) Univ. Toronto Studies., Geol. Set. No. 32,5-9 [MA 5-358].Google Scholar
Winchell, A.N. (1900) Am. Geol. 26, 274.Google Scholar
Wise, W.S. andTschernich, R.W. (1978) Can. Mineral. 16, 487-93.Google Scholar