Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T08:16:44.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of structural order and disorder on the infrared spectra of brittle micas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

V. C. Farmer  and
B. Velde
V. C. Farmer
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen
B. Velde
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Petrographic, Faculté des Sciences, 9 Quai Saint Bernard, Paris 5 ème
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Comparison of the infrared spectra (4000-50 cm−1) of natural and synthetic samples of margarite, beryllian margaritc, ephesite, and clintonite indicates that the tetrahedral layers of margarite and ephcsite, containing Si and Al in equal atomic proportions, are ordered as the spectra are sharp and show no Al-O-Al vibrations. Clintonite of this tctrahedral composition is disordered. The hydroxyl-stretching frequencies are affected by ionic substitutions in both the octahedral and tetrahedral layers. The spectra permit the distinction of the different species of brittle mica. They also indicate the presence of beryllium in margarite, and allow an estimate of the tetrahedral composition of clintonites.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 39 , Issue 303 , September 1973 , pp. 282 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Farmer, (V. C) and Russell, (J. D.), 1964. Spectrochim. Acta, 20, 1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, (V. C) and Velde, (B.), 1970. Min. Mag., 37, 870.Google Scholar
Fernández, (M.), Serratosa, (J. M.), and Johns, (W. D.), 1970. Reunion Hispano-Belga de Minerales de la Arcilla (ed. Serratosa, J. M.), p. 163. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid.Google Scholar
Forman, (S. A.), Kodama, (H.), and Abbey, (S.), 1967. Canad. Min., 9, 25.Google Scholar
Forman, (S. A.) and Maxwell, (J. A.), 1967. Amer. Min., 52, 1122.Google Scholar
Gallagher, (M. J.) and Hawkes, (J. R.), 1966. Bull. Geol. Surv. Great Britain, 25, 59.Google Scholar
Gatineau, (L.) and Merino, (J.), 1966. Bull. Groupe frang. Argilles, 18, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, (K.), Kodama, (H.), and Sudo, (T.), 1965. Canad. Min., 8, 255.Google Scholar
Ishii, (M.), Shimanouchi, (T.), and Nakahira, (M.), 1967. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moenke, (H.), 1966. Mineralspektren II Berlin (Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar
Plyusnina, (I. I.) [IlAioCHHHa (LI. LI.)], 1963. Geokhimiya, 158 (transi, of TeoxirMna).Google Scholar
Schaller, (W. T.), Carron, (M. K.), and Fleischer, (M.), 1967. Amer. Min., 52, 1689.Google Scholar
Stubican, (V.) and Roy, (R.), 1961. Amer. Min., 46, 32.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, (Y.), 1966. Clays and Clay Min., 13, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarte, (P.), 1968. Bull. Soc. frang. Ceram., 81, 63.Google Scholar
Vedder, (W.), 1964. Amer. Min., 49, 736.Google Scholar
Vedder, (W.) and McDonald, (R. S.), 1969. Journ. chem. Phys., 38, 1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velde, (B.), 1971. Min. Mag., 38, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar