Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T08:30:34.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The decomposition and analysis of chrome spinel. A survey of some published techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

K. A. Rodgers
K. A. Rodgers*
Affiliation:
Geology Department, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Examination of published procedures for the decomposition and subsequent analysis of chromite and chrome ores shows some to be unnecessarily complicated and time consuming. Others fail to yield consistent and reproducible results. Decomposition is rapidly and effectively accomplished using the peroxide frit technique of Rafter. Chromium may then be removed and determined volumetrically allowing the rest of the analysis to proceed along conventional silicate lines. Fe2+ is determined by oxidimetry following digestion with a mixture of phosphoric and sulphuric acids in the presence of ceric sulphate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 38 , Issue 299 , September 1972 , pp. 882 - 889
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, (H.), Hawley, (W.G.), and Eardley, (R.P.), 1962. Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc., 61, 20l-6.Google Scholar
Bilgrami, (S.A.) and Ingamells, (C.O.), 1960. Amer. Min. 45, 576-90.Google Scholar
Bryant, (F.J.) and Hardwick, (P.J.), 1950. Analyst, 75, 12-16.10.1039/an9507500012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, (T.O.) and McNEtLl, (T.R.), 1929. lnd. Eng. Chem. Anal, Ed. 1, 71-3.Google Scholar
Dinnin, (J.I.), 1959. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1084-B.Google Scholar
Dinnin, (J.I.), 1961. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 424-D, 397.Google Scholar
Goswami, (H.), 1957. Science and Culture, 22, 398-400.Google Scholar
Hartford, (W.H.), 1953. Anal. Chem. 25, 290-5.10.1021/ac60074a022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrand, (W.F.) and Lundell, (G. E. F.), 1929 . Applied Inorganic Analysis. New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Irvine, (T.N.), 1965. Canad. Journ. Earth Sci. 2, 648-72.10.1139/e65-046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khundkar, (M.H.) and Quadir, (S.J.), 1953. Analyst, 78, 623.Google Scholar
Kodama, (K.), 1963. Quantitative Inorganic Analysis. London, Interscience.Google Scholar
Malhotra, (P.D.), 1954. Analyst, 79, 785-6.Google Scholar
Malhotra, (P.D.), and PRASADA RAO (G. H. S. V.), 1956. Amer. Min. 41,460--73.Google Scholar
Maxwell, (J.A.), 1968. Rock and Mineral Analysis. London, Interscience.Google Scholar
Petretic, (G.J.), 1951. Anal Chem. 23, 1183-4.10.1021/ac60056a042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafter, (T.A.), 1950. Analyst, 75, 485-92.10.1039/an9507500485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, (J.A.), 1962. N.Z. Dominion Laboratory Report, D.L. 20497, 32.Google Scholar
Ross, (C. S.), Foster, (M.D.), and Myers, (A.T.), 1954- Amer. Min. 39, 693-737.Google Scholar
Schumacher, (J.C.), 1960. Perchlorates. American Chemical Society Monograph, 146, 257. New York, Reinhold.Google Scholar
[SHEIN, (A. V.)], (A. B.), 1937. [Zavodskaya Lab. 6, 1199-1205]; Chem. Abstr. 32, 1211 2.Google Scholar
Stevens, (R.E.), 1944. Amer. Min. 297 1–34.Google Scholar
VAN DER WALT, (C. F. J.), 1938. Analyst, 63, 176-80.10.1039/an9386300176CrossRefGoogle Scholar