Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:33:04.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compositional and textural variation in detrital chrome-spinels from the Murray Basin, southeastern Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

M. Pownceby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Detrital chrome-spinels are contaminant grains within heavy-mineral concentrates found in the Murray Basin of southeastern Australia. The presence of even minor levels of chromia in the predominantly ilmenite-rich concentrates downgrades their market value as potential feedstocks for the production of titania pigment.

Compositions from a database of close to 5000 chrome-spinel analyses show a broad range in chemistry. The major element components and their ranges (wt.%) are Cr: 3.10–52.06, Al: 0.46–32.50, Fe: 3.50–44.48 and Mg: 0.03–15.79. Minor components include; Ti: 0.01–6.41, Zn: 0.00–23.00 and Mn: 0.00–5.82. The broad variation in composition suggests multiple source areas for the chrome-spinels although detailed textural examination indicates that variation has also been introduced through pre- and post-deposition alteration processes.

The Murray Basin chrome-spinel database has the potential to be used in interpreting and predicting the effects of various processing conditions used to separate the chrome-spinels from the ilmenite.

Keywords

chrome-spinelMurray Basinilmenite concentratesAustralia
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 191 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, S.J. and Roeder, P.L. (2001) The range of spinel compositions in terrestrial mafic and ultramafic rocks. Journal of Petrology, 42, 2279–2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beukes, J.A. and Van Niekerk, C. (1999) Chromite removal from crude ilmenite. Pp. 97–100 in: Proceedings of Heavy Minerals 1999 (Stimson, R.G., editor). Symposium series S23, The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Dyar, M.D., McGuire, A.V. and Ziegler, R.D. (1989) Redox equilibria and crystal chemistry of coexisting minerals from spinel lherzolite mantle xenoliths. American Mineralogist, 74, 969–980.Google Scholar
Grey, I.E. and Reid, A.F. (1976) The structure of pseudorutile and its role in the natural alteration of ilmenite. American Mineralogist, 60, 898–906.Google Scholar
Grey, I.E. MacRae, CM. and Nicholson, T. (1999) Alteration of ilmenite in the Murray Basin — implications for processing. Pp. 129—134 in: Proceedings of Murray Basin Mineral Sands. Australian Institute of Geoscientists Bulletin No 26, Victoria Park.Google Scholar
Grey, I., Pownceby, M. and Sparrow, G. (2003) Research on processing Murray Basin ilmenites. TheAUSIMM Bulletin, No.2 March/April, pp. 12–18.Google Scholar
Harrowfield, I.R., MacRae, CM. and Wilson, N.C (1993) Chemical imaging in electron microprobes. Pp. 547–548 in: Proceedings of the 27th Annual MAS Meeting 1993. Microbeam Analysis Society, New York.Google Scholar
Irvine, T.N. (1965) Chrome spinel as a petrogenetic indicator. Part I - Theory. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2, 648–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumpkin, G.R. (2001) Crystal chemistry and durability of the spinel structure type in natural systems. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 38, 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, A.J., Teakle, M. and Blampain, P.A. (1998) Heavy mineral sand deposits, Central Murray Basin. Pp. 647—650 in: Geology of Australian and Papua New Guinean Mineral Deposits (Beckman, D.A. and Mackenzie, D.A., editors). Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Nell, J. and Den Hoed, P. (1997) Separation of chromium oxides from ilmenite by roasting and increasing the magnetic susceptibility of Fe2O3-FeTiO3 (ilmenite) solid solutions. Pp. 75–78 in: Proceedings of Heavy Minerals 1997 (Robinson, R.E., editor). Symposium series S17, The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Pederson, K. (1978) Non-stoichiometric magnesian spinels in shale xenoliths from a native iron-bearing andesite at Asuk, Disko, central west Greenland. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 67, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pownceby, M.I., MacRae, CM. and Wilson, N.C. (2001) Electron microprobe mapping - A diagnostic tool for ilmenite characterisation. Pp. 69—74 in: Heavy Minerals 2001. Australasian Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Pownceby, M.I., Fisher-White, M.J., MacRae, CM., Wilson, N.C. and Sparrow, G.J. (2003) Characterization and distribution of chrome spinel grains in magnetically fractionated ilmenite concentrates. Pp. 175–184 in: Heavy Minerals 2003. The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Roy, P.S. Whitehouse, J., Cowell, P.J. and Oakes, G. (2000) Mineral sands occurrences in the Murray Basin, Southeastern Australia. Economic Geology, 95, 1107–1128.Google Scholar
Stevens, R.E. (1944) Compositions of some chromites of the western hemisphere. American Mineralogist, 29, 1–34.Google Scholar
Thayer, T.P. (1946) Preliminary chemical correlation of chromite with the containing rocks. Economic Geology, 41, 202–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, V.A. (1990) WIM 150 detrital heavy mineral deposit. Pp. 1609–1614 in: Geology of the Mineral Deposits of Australia and Papua New Guinea (Hughes, F.E., editor). Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wood, B.J. and Virgo, D. (1989) Upper mantle oxidation state: ferric iron contents of lherzolite spinels by 57Fe Mossbauer spectroscopy and resultant oxygen fugacities. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 1277–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar