Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:44:55.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zoned plagioclase from the charnockites of Kondapalli, Krishna district, Andhra Pradesh, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

C. Leelanandam
C. Leelanandam*
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Downing Place, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Zoning in plagioclase is reported from the charnockitic rocks of Kondapalli, Krishna district, Andhra Pradesh, India, for the first time. Electronprobe studies indicate that the zoned plagioclases consist of homogeneous sodic cores mantled by thin calcic shells, which show continuous zoning of the inverse type. Partial chemical analyses of twelve density fractions of the zoned plagioclase from a basic charnockite exhibit a wide variation in An content from 54·80 to 72·39 %; X-ray studies suggest that they possess ‘fixed’ transitional structural state.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 282 , June 1968 , pp. 805 - 813
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binns, (R. A.), 1965. Min. Mag., vol. 35, p. 561.Google Scholar
Cannon, (R. T.), 1966. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 264, p. 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, (S. C.), 1954. Proc. Pan-Ind. Ocean Sci. Congr. Perth, Sec. C, p. 41.Google Scholar
Eskola, (P.), 1952. Amer. Journ. Sci., Bowen vol., p. 133.Google Scholar
Ghosh, (P. K.), 1941. Rec. Geol. Surv. India, vol. 75, Prof. Paper 15.Google Scholar
Grasty, (R. L.) and Leelanandam, (C.), 1965. Min. Mag., vol. 35, p. 529.Google Scholar
Hills, (E. S.), 1936. Geol. Mag., vol. 73, p. 50.Google Scholar
Holland, (T. H.), 1900. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, vol. 28, p. 119.Google Scholar
Howie, (R. A.), 1955. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. 62, p. 725 [M.A. 13-351].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howie, (R. A.), 1964. Sci. Progress, vol. 42, p. 628 [M.A. 17-3371.Google Scholar
Howie, (R. A.), 1965. Indian Min., vol. 6, p. 67 [M.A. 17-633].Google Scholar
Hsu, (K. J.), 1955. Univ. Calif. Pub. Geol. Sci., vol. 30, p. 223.Google Scholar
Hubbard, (F. H.), 1965. Amer. Min., vol. 50, p. 2040.Google Scholar
Leelanandam, (C.), 1965. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leelanandam, (C.), 1967. Min. Mag., vol. 36, p. 153.Google Scholar
Misch, (P.), 1954. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 65, p. 1287.Google Scholar
Misch, (P.), 1964. Beitr. Min. Petr., vol. 10, p. 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashiro, (A.), 1958. Tokyo Univ. Fac. Sci. Journ., vol. 11, p. 219.Google Scholar
Naidu, (P. R. J.), 1955. Sehweiz. Min. Pet. Mitt., Bd. 34, p. 203.Google Scholar
Parras, (K.), 1958. Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, no. 181.Google Scholar
Shido, (F.), 1958. Tokyo Univ. Fac. Sci. Journ., vol. 11, p. 131.Google Scholar
Slemmons, (D. B.), 1962. Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., Bd. 42, 2 Halvbind, p. 533.Google Scholar
Smith, (J. V.) and Gay, (P.), 1958. Min. Mag., vol. 31, p. 744.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, (A. P.), 1956. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 67, p. 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramaniam, (A. P.), 1959. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. 257, p. 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, (J. A.), 1961. Amer. Min., vol. 46, p. 1097.Google Scholar
Waard, (D. DE), 1967. Journ. Petrology, vol. 8, p. 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar