Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:32:34.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis and study of diaboleïte

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. E. Winchell  and
H. E. Wenden
R. E. Winchell
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
H. E. Wenden
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Diaboleïte has been synthesized between 25 and 100° C at atmospheric pressure and approximate water vapour partial pressures of 14·7 lb/in2. Under similar conditions at 170° C cumengéite appears to be the stable phase produced from a diaboleïte composition. Synthetic diaboleïte is much simpler morphologically than the natural mineral but the hemimorphic symmetry is more clearly demonstrated morphologically in the artificial specimens. A comparison of X-ray powder data for natural and synthetic diaboleïte shows almost exact detailed correspondence in line position and intensity between 0 and 180° 2θ. The cell dimensions obtained from X-ray powder data are a 5·869 ± 0·002 Å and c 5·495 ± 0·003 Å.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 283 , September 1968 , pp. 933 - 939
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byström, (A.) and Wilhelmi, (K.), 1950. Arkiv Kemi., vol. 2, pp. 397–404 [M.A. 11-237].Google Scholar
Friedel, (C.), 1892. Bull. Soc. franç. Min., vol. 15, pp. 96–101.Google Scholar
Palache, (C.), 1941. Amer. Min., vol. 26, pp. 605–612 [M.A. 8-215].Google Scholar
Spencer, (L.) and Mountain, (E.), 1923. Min. Mag., vol. 20, pp. 67–92.Google Scholar