Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:41:37.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potash-rich volcanic rocks from southern Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

G. D. Borley*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Imperial College, London, S.W.7

Summary

Several restricted outcrops of potash-rich volcanic rocks occur in the Spanish provinces of Murcia and Almeria, where they form intrusive pitchstones or surface lavas among country rocks consisting of Tertiary and Quaternary sediments: the volcanic rocks include jumillites and verites from the type localities of Jumilla and Vera and it is these rocks that have been investigated. Jumillites are basic lavas, sometimes coarse-grained, rich in MgO, CaO, K2O, TiO2, and P2O8, poor in SiO2, Al2O3, and Na2O and they contain important, if minor, concentrations of Cr2O3, BaO, SrO, and ZrO2. Their mineralogy is distinctive: chrome diopside, forsterite, titaniferous phlogopite, kataphorite, and sanidine, with rare leucite. Verites, typically, are black pitchstones or pitchstone breccias that range from basic to acid in composition ; they are more variable in their chemistry than jumillites, but in part this variation might be due to introduction of silicate and carbonate into some of the verites during extensive hydrothermal alteration, which has undoubtedly affected their initial chemistry. Mineralogically, verites are simpler than jumillites and have fewer phenocrysts: forsterite, some diopside, phlogopite, and, occasionally, leucite. Certain mineralogical and compositional similarities of jumillites and verites suggest they may have originated from the same type of parental magma. Their mineralogy and chemistry also relate the jumillites and verites to phlogopite-bearing potash-rich volcanics from East Africa, America, and Australia and it seems possible that all these rocks might have a common parent in mica peridotite or mica pyroxenite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cross, (W.), 1897. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 4, p. 115.Google Scholar
Fuster, (J. M.) and Pedro, (F. DE), 1953. Publ. No. 20 Estudios Geol. Inst. Lucas Mallada de Invest. Geol., p. 477.Google Scholar
Hague, (A.), 1889. Amer. Journ. Sei., ser. 3, vol. 38, p. 43.Google Scholar
Harris, (P. G.), 1957. Geochimica Acts, vol. 12, p. 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, (M. H.) and Joplin, (G. A.), 1940. Journ. Roy. Soc. New South Wales, vol. 74, p. 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, (H.), 1936. Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, vol. 39, p. 379.Google Scholar
Holmes, (H.), 1937. Geol. Mag., vol. 74, no. 875, p. 200.Google Scholar
Holmes, (H.), 1950. Amer. Min., vol. 35, p. 772.Google Scholar
Holmes, (H.), 1952. Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc, vol. 15 (Campbell vol.), p. 187.Google Scholar
Holmes, (H.) and Harwood, (H. F.), 1937. Geol. Surv. Uganda, Mere. 111, Pt. 11.Google Scholar
Hurlbut, (C. S.) and Griggs, (D.), 1939. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 50, p. 1043. Inst. Geol. y Min. de España, 1961. Maps Geol. de España. Explicacion de la Hoja No. 869, Jumilla (Murcia-Albacete).Google Scholar
Larsen, (E. S.), 1940. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 51, p. 887.Google Scholar
Osann, (A. Von), 1906. Rosenbusch. Festschr., Stuttgart, p. 233.Google Scholar
Prider, (R. T.), 1960. Journ. Geol. Soc. Australia, vol. 6, Pt. 2, p. 71.Google Scholar
Rittmann, (A.), 1933. Zeits. Vulk., vol. 15, p. 8.Google Scholar
Wade, (A.), 1937. Rep. Australian Assoc. Adv. Sci., vol. 23, p. 93.Google Scholar
Wade, (A.) and Prider, (R. T.), 1940. Quart. Journ. Geol. See., vol. 96, p. 39.Google Scholar
Washington, (H. S.), 1903. The chemical analysis of rocks. New York.Google Scholar
Washington, (H. S.), 1917. U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 99.Google Scholar
Washington, (H. S.), 1927. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 5, vol. 14, p. 173.Google Scholar
Williams, (A. F.), 1932. Genesis of the Diamond, London.Google Scholar
Williams, (H.), 1936. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 47, p. 111.Google Scholar