Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:09:34.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the preferred crystallographic orientation of garnet in some metamorphic rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Derek Powell
Derek Powell*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bedford College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A study of inclusions within garnet porphyroblasts demonstrates that planar inclusion bands and trails lie sub-parallel to one of the {110} planes of the host. The inclusions provide a relic of a rock fabric that existed before the growth of garnet. It is suggested that this fabric has determined the crystallographic orientation of garnet and may have arisen by the nucleation and epitaxial growth of garnet within or upon the mica lattice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 276 , December 1966 , pp. 1094 - 1109
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burke, (J. E.) and Turnbull, (D.), 1952. Progress in Metal Physics, 3, p. 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinner, (G. A.), 1961. Journ. Pet., vol. 2, p. 312.Google Scholar
Eitel, (W.), 1964. Silicate Science, vol. 1, p. 204. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Flinn, (D.), 1954. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. 110, p. 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinn, (D.), 1965. In Controls of Metamorphism, p. 46. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Flett, (J. S.), 1912. In Memoir Geol. Surv. Great Britain, Scotland, Sheet 93.Google Scholar
Frondel, (C.), 1940. Amer. Min., vol. 25, p. 69.Google Scholar
Galwey, (A. K.) and Jones, (K. A.), 1962. Nature, vol. 193, p. 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gliszynski, (S. Von), 1940. Zentr. Min., A, p. 181.Google Scholar
Grigor'ev, (D. P.) 1965. Ontogeny of Minerals, translated from Russian, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Harker, (A.), 1932. Metamorphism. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Kamb, (W. B.), 1959. Journ. Geol., vol. 71, p. 162.Google Scholar
Pitcher, (W. S.) and Read, (H. H.), 1963. Ibid., p. 261.Google Scholar
Powell, (D.), 1964. Proc. Geol. Assoc. Lond., vol. 75, p. 223.Google Scholar
Rast, (N.), 1958. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. 63, p. 143.Google Scholar
Rast, (N.), 1965. In Controls of Metamorphism, p. 73. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Rast, (N.) and Stunt, (B. A.), 1957. Nature, vol. 179, p. 215.Google Scholar
Rast, (N.), Stunt, (B. A.) and Harris, (A. L.), 1962. Ibid., vol. 195, p. 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, (H. H.), 1949. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Lond., vol. 105, p. 101.Google Scholar
Richey, (J. E.) and Kennedy, (W. Q.), 1939. Bull. Geol. Surv. Great Britain, vol. 2, p. 26.Google Scholar
Schaacke, (I.), 1949. Neues Jahrb Min., Abt. A, Abh. vol. 80, p. 145.Google Scholar
Seifert, (H.), 1953. In Structure and Properties of Solid Surfaces. Edit. Gomer and Smith, p. 318. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spry, (A.), 1963. Journ. Petrology, vol. 4, p. 211.Google Scholar
Strand, (T.), 1944. Norsk, geol. Tidsskr., vol. 24, p. 14.Google Scholar
Zwart, (H. J.), 1960. Geol. en Mijn., vol. 39, p. 163.Google Scholar