Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:40:00.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The mineralogy of the potassium-barium feldspar series III: Subsolidus relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

P. Gay
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Cambridge
N. N. Roy
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Cambridge

Summary

Further data are presented on the properties of natural and synthetic members of this series. Cell constants have been determined for over 50 specimens across the composition range; the activation energy for a low-high transformation in an intermediate hyalophane has been evaluated as 101·5 ± 5·0 kcal/mole; additional single crystal studies have revealed complexities not previously reported.

Although there remain many detailed problems to be resolved, the present studies allow some suggestions concerning the nature of the relationships within the series. Problems of nomenclature and subsolidus relations are discussed together with some structural implications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cole, (W. F.), Sörum, (H.), and Kennard, (O.), 1949. Acta Cryst., vol. 2, p. 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deer, (W. A.), Howie, (R. A.), and Zussman, (J.), 1963. Rock-forming minerals, vol. 4. London, Longmans.Google Scholar
Frondel, (C.), Ito, (J.), and Hendricks, (J. G.), 1966. Amer. Min., vol. 51, p. 1388.Google Scholar
Gay, (P.), 1956. Acta Cryst., vol. 9, p. 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, (P.), 1961. Cursillos y conferencias, Lucas Mallada, vol. 8, p. 159.Google Scholar
Gay, (P.), 1965. Min. Mag., vol. 34, p. 204.Google Scholar
Jones, (J. B.) and Taylor, (W. i.), 1961. Acta Cryst., vol. 14, p. 443.Google Scholar
Kelsey, (C. H.), 1964. Min. Mag., vol. 33, p. 809.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, (W. S.) and Smith, (J. V.), 1955. Amer. Min., vol. 40, p. 707.Google Scholar
McConnell, (J. D. C.), 1965. Phil. Mag., vol. 11, p. 1289.Google Scholar
McConnell, (J. D. C.) and McKie, (D.), 1960. Min. Mag., vol. 32, p. 436.Google Scholar
McKie, (D.) and McConnell, (J. D. C.), 1963. Ibid., vol. 33, p. 581.Google Scholar
Roy, (N. N.), 1965a. Ibid., vol. 35, p. 508.Google Scholar
Roy, (N. N.), 1965b. Nature, vol. 206, p. 501.Google Scholar
Roy, (N. N.), 1965c. Amer. Min., vol. 50, p. 1441.Google Scholar
Roy, (N. N.), 1967. Min. Mag., vol. 36, p. 43.Google Scholar
Schneider, (T. R.), 1957. Zeits. Krist., vol. 109, p. 245.Google Scholar
Smith, (J. V.), 1956. Min. Mag., vol. 31, p. 47.Google Scholar
Vermaas, (F. H. S.), 1953. Amer. Min., vol. 38, p. 845.Google Scholar
Yosimura, (T.), 1939. Journ. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ., ser. 4, vol. 4, p. 313.Google Scholar