Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:06:58.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rosasite, aurichalcite, and associated minerals from Heights of Abraham, Matlock Bath, Derbyshire, with a note on infra-red spectra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. S. W. Braithwaite  and
George Ryback
R. S. W. Braithwaite
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, College of Science and Technology University of Manchester
George Ryback
Affiliation:
Dyson Perrins Laboratory, University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Rosasite and aurichalcite occur with other copper, zinc, and also lead minerals in Masson Cavern, Rutland Cavern, and other workings in the Heights of Abraham, Matloek Bath, Derbyshire. Partial analyses of two specimens each of rosasite and aurichalcite show Cu : Zn ratios typical of the respective species. They appear to have been formed by the action of solutions containing zinc on disseminated chalcopyrite. The infra-red absorption spectra of malachite, rosasite, aurichalcite, and hydrozincite, examined by the mull technique, are shown to fall into two groups corresponding with the structural groups established by X-ray work. Twin absorption maxima at O-H stretching frequencies are present in the spectra of malachite and of rosasite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 33 , Issue 261 , June 1963 , pp. 441 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © 1963, The Mineralogical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, (W.), 1845. The gem of the Peak, 4th edn, London.Google Scholar
Bolgov, (G.P.) and Rozybaxyeva, (N.A.) , 1956. [Sborniknaukh trud. Kazakh. gorno-metal, inst., no. 14, p. 34.; abstr, in Chem. Abstr. 1959, vol.1, col 7868.Google Scholar
Bryan, (B.), 1903. History of Matlock. London and Derby.Google Scholar
Caillére, (S.) and Pobeguin (Th.), 1960. Bull. Soc. franc. Min. Crist., vol. 1, p. 36.Google Scholar
Cameron, (K.), 1959. Place-names of Derbyshire, part 2. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canals, (E), Marionan, (R.), and Cordier, (S.), Cameron (K.), 1949a. [Travaux Soc. Pharm. Montpellier, col. 9, p. 55.; abstr, in Chem. Abstr. 1954, vol.1, col. 8111.Google Scholar
Canals, (E), 1949b. Annales Pharm. franc., vol.1, p. 502.Google Scholar
Caruthers, (R.G.) and Strahan, (A.), 1923. Mem. Geol. Survey; Special Reports on the Mineral Resources of Great Britain, vol. 1, p. 76.Google Scholar
Connel, (A.), 1848. Edin. New Phil. Journ., vol. 1, p. 36.Google Scholar
Davies, (O.), 1935. Roman mines in Europe. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dunhah, (K. C), 1952. Mem. Geol. Survey; Special Reports on the Mineral Resources of Great Britain, vol. 1, 4th edn.Google Scholar
Farey, (J.), 1811. General view of the agriculture and minerals of Derbyshire, vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Green, (A.H.) and Strahan, (A.), 1887. Mem. Geol. Survey; Carboniferous Limestone, etc., of North Derbyshire, 2nd edn, p. 148.Google Scholar
Grec, (R.P.) and Lettsom, (W.G.), 1858. Manual of the mineralogy of Great Britain and Ireland. London.Google Scholar
Hall, (T.M.), 1868. The mineralogists directory. London.Google Scholar
Hartley, (J.), 1959. Trans. Leeds Geol. Assoc., vol. 1, p. 103.Google Scholar
Huang, (C.K.) and Kerr, (P.F.), 1960. Amer. Min., vol. 1, p. 311.Google Scholar
Hvnt, (J.M.) and Turner, (D.S.), 1953. Anal. Chem., vol., 25, p. 1169.Google Scholar
Hvnt, (J.M.) Wisherd, (M.P.), and Bon]∼AM, (L.C.), 1950. Ibid., vol. 1, p. 1478.Google Scholar
Kingseurr, (A. W. G.) and Hartley, (J.), 1957. Min. Mag., vol. 1, p. 501.Google Scholar
Laiyner, (P.J.), 1952. Amer. Min., vol. 1, p. 764.Google Scholar
Lauro, (C.), 1938. Periodico Min., Roma, vol. 1, p. 105.Google Scholar
Miller, (F.A.) and Wilxins, (C.H.), 1952. Anal. Chem., vol. 1, p. 1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, (G.), 1954. 19th Internat. Geol. Congr., Algiers, Fasc. 15, p. 523.Google Scholar
Nash, (D.A.) and Workman, (H.G.), 1955. Report OM/CN/147 of the Operation Mole Spelaeological Group, Matlock.Google Scholar
Palaohe, (C.), Berman, (H.), and Frondel, (C.), 1951. Dana's system of mineralogy, 7th edn, vol. 1. New York and London.Google Scholar
Plyler, (E.K.) and Peters, (C.W.), 1950. Journ. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards, vol. 1, p. 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pobeguin, (Th.), 1960. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 1, p. 2389.Google Scholar
Pobeguin, (Th.), and Lecomte, (J.), 1953. Ibid., vol. 1, p. 1544.Google Scholar
Ramsdell, (L.S.), 1947. Amer. Min., vol. 1, p. 207.Google Scholar
Schneiderhöhn, (H.). [Briefliche Mitteilungen, Frankfurt]; quoted by Biehl, (F.K.), Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Mineralien der Erzlagerstiitten yon Tsumeb; Inaug.-Diss. Miinster; Osnabruck, 1919.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, (Y.), 1958. Min. Journ. [Japan], vol. 1, p. 245.Google Scholar
Tooke, (A.W.), 1837. Mining Review, no. 4, p. 43.Google Scholar
Traill, (J.G.), 1939. Econ. Geol., vol. 1, p. 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, (A.L.), Toribara, (T.Y.), and Neuman, (W.F.), 1955. Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. 1, p. 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenn, (C.B.) and Drabble, (G.C.), 1908. Trans. Inst. Mining Engng., vol. 1, p. 501.Google Scholar
Wells, (A.F.), 1951. Acta Cryst., vol. 1, p. 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, (C.J.), 1881. Midland Naturalist, vol. 1, p. 88.Google Scholar