Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:27:20.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micro-forms of hay-silica glass and of volcanic glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

George Baker
George Baker*
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Mineragraphic Section, c/o University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In view of recently reported microtektites in deep-sea sediments north-west, south-west, and south of Australia, attention is drawn to the occurrence of minute forms of hay-silica glass among the products of incineration of opal-bearing vegetation in haystacks, and to the minute forms of volcanic glass ejected in lava fountains. These terrestrial micro-forms of glass have properties within the range of those for the fossil glassy bodies named ‘microtektites’. It is possible that the fusion of opal contained in silica-accumulator plants during fierce, prehistoric forest, bush, and grass fires in Australia generated micro-forms of glass that became readily airborne and drifted away in up-currents. Carried by the south-east Trades, they would ultimately descend over the Wharton Basin in the Indian Ocean. Strong to violent northerlies and north-easterlies (Brickfielder Winds) would carry them over the ocean south and south-west of Australia. Thus they could contribute to the deposits of bodies of glass regarded as microtektites in deep-sea sediments. Many microbodies of glass in the Wharton Basin could have had their origin in the Javanese volcanic eruptions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 36 , Issue 283 , September 1968 , pp. 1012 - 1023
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, (G.), 1956. Mem. nat. Mus. Vict., vol. 20, pp. 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, (G.), 1957. Amer. Jourm Sci., vol. 256, pp. 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, (G.), 1960. Micropaleontol., vol. 6, pp. 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, (G.), 1961a. C.S.I.R.O. Min. Invest. Techn. Paper. No. 4, 3-12.Google Scholar
Baker, (G.), 1961b. Mem. Queensland Mus., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Baker, (G.), 1966. Geochimie. Acta, vol. 30, pp. 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, (G.) and Baker, (A. A.), 1964. Mem. nat. Mus. Viet., vol. 26, pp. 21–35.Google Scholar
Glass, (B.), 1967. Nature, vol. 214, pp. 372–374.Google Scholar
Glass, (B.) and Heezen, (B. C.), 1967. Ibid., p. 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, (H.), Turner, (F. J.), and Gilbert, (C. M.), 1954. Petrography, San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar