Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:46:04.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population Growth and Settlement Pattern in Franklin and Hampshire Counties, Massachusetts, 1650-1850

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Alan C. Swedlund
Alan C. Swedlund*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Locational Analysis has been a fundamental part of research in plant ecology and cultural geography for many years (for reviews see Greig-Smith 1964; Haggett 1966; Harvey 1967; King 1969; Morrill 1970). Recently there has been a growing interest in applying locational analysis in anthropological studies (for example, Plog 1968; Zubrow 1970; Wood 1971; Johnson 1972; Marcus 1973; Whallon 1973a, 1973b; Waddell 1972). The spatial organization of settlements and smaller units of human activity is relevant to an understanding of population structure. The distribution of human activity areas is presumably the result of complex interrelationships between social, biological, and ecological variables, and therefore should provide significant information regarding the effects of these variables in given situations. This paper will compare the historic pattern of community growth in Hampshire and Franklin Counties, Massachusetts, with that predicted by Hudson's (1969) model of rural settlement location.

The topography of the study area (Fig. 1) is dominated by the presence of the Connecticut River Valley and its tributaries. This region was first settled by Europeans in the 1650s and was primarily agricultural until recent times. The area has been characterized by rapid population growth over much of its history, and the population has tended to be distributed in the form of towns and small villages. The time period considered in the present study will be 1650-1850 which represents the time of maximum dispersal of settlements, prior to the advent of the automobile and most railroad traffic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology , Volume 30: Population Studies in Archaeology and Biological Anthropology: A Symposium , 1975 , pp. 22 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, E. M. 1907 The Connecticut River and the Valley of the Connecticut. Putnam and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Bartholemew, John and Son 1972 Times world atlas. London Times, London.Google Scholar
Blouet, Brian W. 1972 Factors influencing the evolution of settlement patterns. In Man, settlement and urbanism, edited by Ucko, J., Tringham, R., and Dimbleby, G., pp. 3–15. G. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Boyce, A. J., Küchemann, C. F., and Harrison, G. A. 1968 The reconstruction of historical movement patterns. In Record linkage in medicine, edited by Acheson, E. D., pp. 303–317. Livingstone Publishers, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Clark, P. J. and Evans, F. C. 1954 Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Massachusetts 1920 Historical data relating to counties, cities and towns in Massachusetts. Division of Public Records. Wright and Potter, Boston.Google Scholar
Dickinson, R. 1818 A description of Deerfieldin Franklin County. G. J. Newcomb, Greenfield.Google Scholar
Getis, A. 1964 Temporal land-use pattern analysis with the use of nearest neighbor and quadrat methods. A nnalsof the Association of American Geographers 54:391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E., and Harrington, Virginia 1966 American population before the federal census of 1790. Peter Smith, Gloucester.Google Scholar
Greig-Smith, P. 1964 Quantitative plant ecology. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Haggett, P. 1966 Locational analysis in human geography. St. Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 1967 Models of the evolution of spatial patterns in human geography. In Integrated models in geography, edited by Chorley, Richard and Haggett, P., pp. 549–608. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. C. 1969 A location theory for rural settlement. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 58:365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. 1957 Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 12:415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. A. 1972 A test of the utility of central place theory in archaeology. In Man, settlement and urbanism, edited by Ucko, P., Tringham, R., and Dimbleby, G., pp. 769–785. G. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
King, H. R. 1965 The settlement of the upper Connecticut River Valley to 1675. Ph.D. dissertation, Vanderbilt University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
King, L. J. 1962 A quantitative expression of the pattern of urban settlements in selected areas of the United States. Tijdschrift voor Economiische en Sociale Geografie 53:1–7.Google Scholar
King, L. J. 1969 Statistical analysis in geography. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Klimm, L. E. 1933 The relation between certain population changes and the physical environment in Hampden, Hampshire and Franklin counties, Massachusetts, 1871-1925. Published Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Geography, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Marcus, J. 1973 Territorial organization of the lowland Classic Maya. Science 180:911–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrill, R. 1970 The spatial organization of society. Duxbury Press, Belmont.Google Scholar
Paynter, R., Green, S., and Wobst, H. M. 1974 Spatial clustering: techniques of discrimination. Paper presented at the 1974 meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Plog, F. 1968 Archaeological surveys: a new perspective. M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Sheldon, G. 1895 A history of Deerfield, Massachusetts. E.A. Hall, Greenfield.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956 Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Swedlund, Alan 1971 The genetic structure of an historical population: A study of marriage and fertility in Old Deerfield, Massachusetts. University of Massachusetts, Research Reports in Anthropology 7.Google Scholar
Swedlund, Alan 1972 Further observations on the concept of neighborhood knowledge and the distribution of marriage distances. Annals of Human Genetics 35:327–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Bureau of the Census 1791 Return of the whole number of person within the several districts of the United States. Childs and Swaine, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census 1967 Area Measurement Reports GE-20, No. 23. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Waddell, E. 1972 The mound builders. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
Walker, O. W. 1891 Atlas of Massachusetts. George H. Walker, Boston.Google Scholar
Whallon, Robert Jr. 1973a Spatial analysis of occupation floors I: Application of dimensional analysis of variance. American Antiquity 38:266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whallon, Robert Jr. 1973b Spatial analysis of occupation floors II: The application of nearest neighbor analysis. American Antiquity 39:16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J. 1971 Fitting discrete probability distributions in prehistoric settlement patterns. In The distribution of prehistoric population aggregates, edited by Gumerman, G., pp. 63–82. Prescott College Press, Prescott, AZ.Google Scholar
Zubrow, E. B. W. 1971 Carrying capacity and dynamic equilibrium in the prehistoric Southwest. American Antiquity 36: 127–138.Google Scholar