Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:39:30.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age Differentials Between Spouses and Australian Marriage Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

B. J. Williams
B. J. Williams*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over a very large area of the central desert and the Northern Territory of Australia the aboriginal populations were characterized by an unusual demographic feature, a remarkable difference in age between spouses at first marriage. Among the various dialect groups the average age of the woman at first marrage was 15 to 20 years less than that of her husband. This is a demographic feature which obviously requires explanation and there have been at least three explanations advanced to date.

Type
Research Article
Information
Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology , Volume 30: Population Studies in Archaeology and Biological Anthropology: A Symposium , 1975 , pp. 38 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrai, I., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Moroni, A. 1962 Frequencies of pedigrees of consanguineous marriages and mating structure of the populations. Annals of Human Genetics 25:347–377.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Kimura, M., and Barrai, I. 1966 The probability of consanguineous marriages. Genetics 54:37–60.Google Scholar
Fison, L., and Howitt, A. W. 1880 Kamilaroi and Kurnai. George Robinson, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Goodale, Jane C. 1962 Marriage contracts among the Tiwi. Ethnology 1:452–465.Google Scholar
Hajnal, J. 1963 Concepts of random mating and the frequency of consanguineous marriages. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 159:125–174.Google Scholar
Hiatt, L. R. 1965 Kinship and conflict. Australian National University, Canberra. 1968 Gidjingali marriage arrangements. In Man the hunter, edited by Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I., pp. 165–175. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Meggitt, M. J. 1962 Desert people. Angus, Sydney.Google Scholar
Montagu, M. F. Ashley 1957 The reproductive development of the female. Julian Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rose, F. G. G. 1960 The Australian aboriginal family: some theoretical considerations. Forschen und Wirken 3:415–437.Google Scholar
Rose, F. G. G. 1963 On the structure of the Australian family. VI CongresInternational des Sciences Anthropologiques et Ethnologiques, Paris 2(1):247–251.Google Scholar
Rose, F. G. G. 1968 Australian marriage, land-owning groups, and initiations. In Man the hunter, edited by Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I., pp. 200–208. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schull, W. J., and MacCluer, J. W. 1968 Inbreeding in human populations, with special reference to Takushima, Japan. In Haldane and modern biology, edited by Dronamraju, K. R., pp. 79–98. Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Williams, B. J. 1974 A model of band society. Society for American Archaeology, Memoir 29.Google Scholar